As they have ending tracking asymptomatic cases and ended the mask mandate for the vaccinated, it seems like a switch has been flipped. Many states jumping to end their mandates. So my question is, who or what has given that order to the CDC?
As they have ending tracking asymptomatic cases and ended the mask mandate for the vaccinated, it seems like a switch has been flipped. Many states jumping to end their mandates. So my question is, who or what has given that order to the CDC?
~~~~~~~~~~~~
#METOO
I’ve been wondering if friend or FOE directed those changes, and as I always try to remind myself, it could be a combination of those.
One of the critical problems (risks) with the Covid ‘vaccines’ is ADE (immune enhancement - makes you more severely ill than you would otherwise become by sensitizing
you - your immune system then ‘overheats.’
In animal trials for mRNA technology in 2005 and 2012, vaccinating the trial animals (cats) caused them to produce the desired antibodies (100%) success. But when later exposed to the virus, all sickened and died.
They trialed vaccinated mice and sacrificed them (killed and examined their lungs) after exposure to the virus and found disease.
This technology never made it out of animal trials until Covid-19, and there is no known body of work that shows they overcame the problem/risk of ADE.
By now ruling that they will not track mild/asymptomatic Covid, they protect themselves a few ways.
They know their ‘efficacy rate’ is not really 95% and if they were tracking mild/asymptomatic illness, this would become obvious.
They know their PCR test is not valid, does not detect the Covid-19 virus. By eliminating this mild/asymptomatic illness tracking they help continue the sham of using it.
But I think the main ‘protection’ they gain is that by not tracking mild illness, they will hide a portion of the young people who will now have symptoms of Covid. The young among the unvaccinated rarely get Covid unless immunocompromised.
With vaccination and its risk of ADE, the young will otherwise have Covid in greater numbers. Initially, less severe because their immune systems are stronger than the older folks, but they will have Covid in numbers greater than the non-vaccinated group as a result of ADE.
Among the older people, the vaccinated are at risk of having Covid-19 in greater numbers than they ‘should’ but their illnesses will likely be excused by ‘stronger variants’ and older age making them ‘more vulnerable than we realized’ or some such farce.
I think the mask mandate lift is because their attempts to force vaccination are meeting with resistance so they are going to turn it over to the public to further harass those wearing masks - tell them to get the vaccine and stop ‘killing us all.’
Think of high density ‘Karen’ zones and being the only person wearing a mask in the local organic produce store. The hatred they will turn on those people.
Or ‘random’ attacks on the masked, false flags committed by masked. Since conservatives are more resistant to vaccination, it helps put a MAGA target on everyone wearing a mask.
I don’t know if this will work though because they’ve terrorized more liberals than conservatives.
If these are white hat objectives that I have mistaken for black hat objectives, then both steps are a move toward opening up our nation. It’s possible both sides want this for their own reasons.
On May 5, the CDC published to their website data they would rather hide showing that of all the 500+K deaths they have attributed to Covid, only 5% are from ‘Covid only” and the other 95% of deaths averaged 4 comorbidities. So I wonder - who made them publish that? They are lying everywhere else but some key data - like actual death rate.
SO maybe both sides are jostling each other over reports and measures.
Just a hunch - I think the DS is desparate and made changes to try to make inroads. They risk little and can make up new lies in an hour and reverse everything they just said - they do it all the time. :/