Posted on 05/10/2021 5:56:19 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Again, a thank you to Francis Menton. He allows use of full articles as long as attribution and a link are provided.
Thank you.
AGW is not science. If it were science there would be one model and it would be predictive. It would be falsifiable.
The mere fact AGW cannot separate human activity from planetary activity in ANY of its models disqualifies it as a Scientific Theory.
Just providing a quick unassailable argument. I have posed this on many lefty boards and it has NEVER been successfully challenged. A couple of times some have posted “yes there IS a single model.” My response: “point me to it.”
Where there is money to be had, there is fraud..................
A good resource for those not yet acquainted with it:
https://realclimatescience.com/
I think the word you are looking for is “psyience” which sounds a lot like “science”, but has no bearing on true “science” at all.
“Psyience” is a series of made up facts, that support any hypothesis you have, and allows you to throw away any samples that don’t support your hypothesis.
“Psyience” is fixed, unchangeable and cannot be questioned, because .... psyience says so.
If they a redefine male/female to suit their needs; let’s create a new word to suit their definitions.
Wow. Very good. Should be headline news, all over the world.
>>“Psyience” is fixed, unchangeable and cannot be questioned, because .... psyience says so.<<
Ah, yes. And do remember the methodology:
Draw your lines, then plot your points.
Keep in mind that if they poll “psyentists” and a majority (aka “consensus”) decides that pi is 3.2 then that is now the value of pi.
Has Prophet Gore offered a comment yet?
When you offer grant money to scientists they quickly devolve into money-grabbing liars and propagandists.
Scientists are human—flaws and all.
The Climate Scam is similar to Beria’s crime philosophy: show me the climate change concept and I will find you a
supposed proof for it.
You are correct. I have followed this subject closely for 30 years beginning in college when I bought the premise as a naive’ young person.
I remember the predictions and alarmist statements that never came to pass. On top of that, I became fascinated with the politics of the subject. The premise allows for centralized control of people and their activities. The funding is only given to those who promote the hypothesis.
The hypothesis has failed repeatedly, but they do not abandon it and say the “science is settled.” Real science is never settled.
AGW is a political idea wrapped in pseudoscience. The climate is constantly changing and history shows this to be true absent any influence from man.
I happen to like Pi, I like Pi a lot; more than my MD thinks is healthy. Perhaps this is due to gluttony - but, cutting my Cherry Pi into 3.14159267 pieces is difficult, and cutting it into 3.2 pieces isn’t much easier.
Thus, Pi should be 4. That’s how Psyience works, not a lot of reason, thought or even consideration of how Pi is actually used. But it “feels” good, and that’s all that matters to Psyientists all over the world.
What’s even better about Psyience, if you can fog a mirror; you are qualified to speak as a Psyientist. And take my word on this, you will hear a lot from liberal Psyientists.
Ever let science get in the way of a good narrative to manipulate people
USA Today. /s
I sense a shift away from AGW. I’m reading Koonin’s book and it may bring out more truth from the silent scientists who know better.
Mars carbon dioxide is 95% and as cold as Nancy during a Trump speech , LOL
Great article, thanks for posting it. (If I wasn’t on FR, I would have missed it completely)
Peer review is a joke now across the entire spectrum of scientific and medical papers now, and everyone knows it is a joke.
And interesting enough back in the late 70’s and early 80’s when the new ice age was upon us many of the same scientist were calling for exactly the same measure to fight it. More centralized government, less freedom, higher taxes, reduced lifestyle. Funny how that works.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.