Peer reviewed study finds that ivermectin is effective as prophylaxis for Covid-19 and as a therapeutic remedy

American Thinker ^ | 6 May, 2021 | Thomas Lifson

[MtnClimber]

The article concludes: "ivermectin should be globally and systematically deployed in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19." Unlike the vaccines, it is not an experimental drug and is known to be safe for all but a few with other conditions.

I expect the corporate media will ignore as much as possible the findings of a peer-reviewed study just published in the American Journal of Therapeutics that concludes the readily-available, inexpensive (off-patent) drug ivermectin is effective in treating existing cases of Covid-19 and in preventing coming down with the illness. Unlike the experimental vaccines that we are being ceaselessly urged to take, ivermectin has been around for many years and is safe for all but a few people. From the article:

Numerous studies report low rates of adverse events, with the majority mild, transient, and largely attributed to the body's inflammatory response to the death of the parasites and include itching, rash, swollen lymph nodes, joint paints, fever, and headache.75 In a study that combined results from trials including more than 50,000 patients, serious events occurred in less than 1% and largely associated with administration in Loa loa.76

[Triple]

You are free to take the gene therapy, if you do choose. Please be informed about what you are doing.

It is experimental gene therapy. According to the FDA’s own definition, you are becoming a GMO human.

There are scholars that are saying the public does not have enough information about these vaccines to give informed consent. - I agree with that assessment.

Do you know what an adenovirus vector vaccine is, or how it works?

Few people do, and if they did would balk.

Meanwhile, dr ass is like a carnival barker calling in marks.

[Pollard]

Thanks, I saw him in front of congress and he seemed full of common sense and very level headed.

[Faith65]

bfl