Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers; ransomnote; Jane Long; Cathi; bagster; metmom; arthurus; Steve Van Doorn

No, no I don’t. But you didn’t find these on patents.google.com by browsing around, did you? You found them on some stupid conspiracy website. And you may have briefly looked at them before giving up trying to understand what was in the actual patents, took the kook author’s word for it that it was the CDC patenting the SARS-CoV-2 virus for profit, and pasted it here. Spreading nonsense ideas like cancer.

So why don’t you be honest for a change and paste the link to whatever kook conspiracy website it was that you found this ridiculous nonsense on so we can all have a laugh?


76 posted on 05/05/2021 8:31:13 AM PDT by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: 2aProtectsTheRest

I don’t know who finds your posts interesting - it’s all Alinsky shin kicking without merit. *yawn*


78 posted on 05/05/2021 8:34:41 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: 2aProtectsTheRest
ROFL!

I looked at them enough to see that the dealt with patenting of human coronavirus SARS-CoV.

Which means, in the real world, if you're GOING to do gain of function on SARS-CoV

which is what you would need to do to create SARS-CoV2 (q.v.)

then it would make sense to pursue and obtain a patent on SARS-CoV first, in order to forestall any competition, so you have a clear field on

a) any true vaccines (the "ostensible" reason for the research)
b) control on any legal, readily accessible supplies (might be handy for blocking any competing research groups at other universities, or at least keeping an eye on them)
This would also be consistent with the fact that the patents were a long time ago, when SARS 1 made its appearance. Technology was not as advanced back then, and setting up the labs and equipment, and getting the experimental protocols defined and arranged, took longer.

And I reject your characterization as a "kook website"; that's a great propaganda technique to make people's eyes glaze over and not even bother to look -- which is just what someone engaged in, say, highly illegal bioweapons precursors, would WANT.

Since you mention "giving up trying to understand what is in the actual patents" --> again, FAIL on your part.

A couple posts ago, you were loudly and confidently proclaiming that there WERE NO PATENTS.

Now you've moved the goalposts, to "KOOK SITE" and "you're too stupid to understand, peon."

See, we KNOW now, you and a few others are glowies, or Big Pharma tools, or misinformation trolls.

So we know not to take any of your accusations at face value.

You're using what might be called a "defense in depth" trading mild concessions for time, in the hopes that your buddies in the Deep State can force the mRNA jabs on an unwilling, increasingly aware population before the medical facts about them, which were conveniently hidden by fast-tracking and foregoing conventional rigorous testing, come out.

Remember when you tried to engage me using the SAME argument, "there will never be any posts' on genetic therapy?

And I posted the SEC filing where Moderna admitted it, and admitted they were well over a billion dollars in debt?

The motivation and opportunity are all there.

There's a lot of money for propagandists without a soul or conscience like you.

Fortunately, there are also honest people willing to shine the light on all the cockroaches.

80 posted on 05/05/2021 8:57:05 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson