There is no such thing as SUPPER.
There is breakfast, lunch, and DINNER.
(and second breakfast)
#Trogladyke
Posted on 05/04/2021 2:14:19 PM PDT by ransomnote
Well, I’m just glad (and surprised) I’m not involved in this one.
Why we all take a break and go have supper?
There is no such thing as SUPPER.
There is breakfast, lunch, and DINNER.
(and second breakfast)
#Trogladyke
Flash bulletin: Its not all about you, Chase.
It can't be. Cause its all about me.
It’s called “The Last Supper”.........not “The Last Dinner”........
#ArthurFleck
(I don’t why that hashtag but I like it)
That's what you get when you let hillbillies interpret from the original language.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3964271/posts
Israel finding that the shots cause damage to the heart.
Most of these world leaders have received a shot themselves, and innumerable doctors and nurses. And every professor you never heard of.
_____________
Just a personal observation:
Some world leaders who openly made fools of the elite backers of this cluster (especially those in India & Africa) died suspiciously subsequent to their inoculation.
Medscape has a forum for health professionals (includes the business side and academics) to report sequela (SE) after inoculation, including time to resolution. About 600 reports from all over the world last time I looked. Major pattern of neurological events on a spectrum and an obvious pattern of test after expensive test that showed *no cause*. The good news is there appears to be some slow resolution with long-term effects yet unknown.
All the reporting protocols are arduous and time-consuming and subject to gate-keeping (meaning CDC can refuse them as *illegitimate*).
Stay tuned. Dr Peter McCollough’s group (Can’t recall which one of 3) says they have 2 CDC whistleblowers and someone from either NIH or related agency. Just saw this today and they are admittedly, along w/Reiner Fullmich, going slow and by-the-book, just as our conservative election auditors in the US are staying within legal lines. They believe the US has had at least 50,000 deaths since December.
Truth always outs, eventually. From a cursory glance at the daily vax stats (FWIW), it looks to me like vax acceptance has stalled and this includes people with 1 inoculation not getting the 2nd.
Anecdotally (and remember, a preponderance of anecdote DOES eventually equal data), I know formerly eager vaccinees who are now not taking shot #2 and *fully-vaxxed* (TM) who are balking at the idea of a booster. This based on their own experience and observations.
Over 30 years ago, Dr Ron Paul was able to spearhead the Senate to kill a Dem proposal for a universal medical/health information database in the US. This is a major reason we do not have a vax passport here, along with the individual states who are passing specific laws against them. At the same time, forced vax and vax passports are being ramped up or in use around the world and in the usual D hellholes.
The jury is out, but the evidence on the side of an open collusion of leaders (likely not fairly elected)on board, either by conviction or coercion, to push all the horrible events of the past 18 months is mounting.
They count on the fact that decent humans cannot wrap their minds around a global medically-facilitated holocaust.
Not just the forecasts. In my area, we have egregiously erroneous *constant-update in real time* (TM) reports.
I mean temp in 80s with humidity of 29% (we are in drought) that says ‘feels like 131’, 20-degree deviations between current reports (most often wrong) and the hourly forecast (closer to correct) and maps showing total coverage of dark green for rain with no perceptible rainfall in the real world.
It’s been like this for 2 years or longer and NOAA is now a punchline.
...every dingbat thing like this...
_________________________________
Define *dingbat*? Sounds very close to ad hominem.
I believe you misspelled “Counter to controlling narrative of those in power*.
And by *in power*, I do not imply legitimacy.
...enough people in the right places believe the disinformation told to them. Then they unwittingly become a tool of that plan while believing they are doing real good.
______________________________________
Dr. Reiner Fullmich, licensed in California and in Germany, who is also an accredited attorney, has been doing interviews and has researchers in various locations looking into exactly that, has estimated around 3,000 individuals *in the know* and at the top.
My take: some the ultimate profiteers, some loyal to that group and some subject to the various levers of coercion. of course, there will be overlap.
...where Moderna admitted it, and admitted they were well over a billion dollars in debt?
__________________________
Not to mention Moderna has zero track record prior to their COVID *vaccine* (TM). The are literally a corporation of convenience.
...that an old dictionary definition they dug up somewhere somehow means they aren’t vaccines.
____________________________________________
A standard scientific definition that was literally changed to benefit the current situation just a few months ago, concurrent with the *rollout*.
It was/is classic memory-hole procedure.
It only works if all you are allowed to use for reference is the on-line version of a specifically woke website that uses *dictionary* in its designation.
Some of us still have official paper copies of actual English and medical dictionaries that were current as of 3 months ago.
It is standard practice to designate *obsolete* or historical terms as such. Not one paper dictionary even has a nod to “herd-immunity is that acquired by a vaccine”. Not even as colloquial.
And I am a word nerd who has been reading dictionaries for 70 years and actually anticipates new editions.
So post your preferred definition for the word "vaccine" and let's see what that actually covers.
The definition that was changed was actually the definition of herd immunity. The change was to the effect that it was immunity achieved by vaccine injection, with no acknowledgement of either inherent or cellular immunity. Then came the conflation of mRNA with a true vaccine and here we all are squabbling over definitions.
I get the concept of mRNA as opposed to the attenuated or killed pathogen mode as a sort of vaccine. And if anyone wants to extend the definition of vaccine to mRNA that programs cells to produce an actual pathogen, I can’t stop them.
But the manufacturers and Malone, the inventor, call it an operating system. It IS gene therapy of the sort that has long been proposed to treat cancer and genetic defects. THAT is what it is.
Many people took the injection for a variety of reasons. The entire world is now terrified of the results lying ahead, especially with such an admitted disparity between the published numbers and the gut knowledge of the involved professionals of the extrapolated numbers of deaths and long term results.
All of humanity, the actual victims of this event, fighting among ourselves only provides distraction that benefits the perpetrators. Already, the bright people are working on how to treat and mitigate the morbidities and the fight is really to prevent any more mortality.
I think the smugness displayed by those attempting to paint the injection as some sort of miracle that saved humanity from an obviously non-lethal virus is uncalled for. Most such defenders either took the injection or those they love did. Their chosen stance is based in fear and guilt.
Not everyone is adversely affected so far. My guess is maybe 5% dead and another 4-5% with severe reactions, some of which will resolve. So, the odds favor resilient humans.
The real questions are: why was this rushed? If it’s so effective, why boosters? And since the variants produced by the injected only vary by 3% from the original CV19, natural immunity will protect the recovered and the inherently immune.
So, besides the already deceased, who cannot be resurrected, the threat remains to the injected. We need to stop new injections, get to the bottom of motivations, work on mitigations and let the mRNA be used for the genetic therapy it was designed for, with full testing beforehand and full transparency.
No one wants to play gotcha except the scared and the guilty. Maybe that’s to be expected. It’s very painful to accept that one has been duped, used, betrayed by someone who was trusted.
But that is being revealed as more apparently the truth by the hour.
Personally, I want to discover the end game of the perps who are behind this without having all the horror play out any further. Once we know that, we can mitigate it and they can be dealt with appropriately.
I have taken numerous vaccines. I’m old enough that I have loads of natural immunity via survival. I stay abreast of the global Awakening community not because I follow anyone or have any allegiance to whatever Q may have been or is, but because the best research has come out of that community on various facets of this war we are in: political, economic, medical and spiritual. Also, there are many highly educated professionals in that movement and they are generous with their knowledge, so I learn a lot, dumbed down to my lay level. Lots of human kindness there, as well.
We really are all in this together and if not, we really will all die alone. I suggest we cease the petty bickering, overcome anger, frustration, fear, and guilt, stop the blaming and turn as one towards the evil minds who are telling us they want to cull humanity, alter the environment, replace the biome with an artificially produced & manufactured construct that has no sustainability at all, and return to feudalism with a technocratic overlay.
I’m old. The insidious culture these wanna-be transhumanists have elevated has consumed my blood family. I have a lot less skin in this game than those with children, grandchildren and extended kin.
I would, however, like to hang around long enough to see the perpetrators of this transhumanistic reset get their just deserts. You might want to rethink your own position and decide who your real enemy is, as well.
As the Q-ers say: Where we go one, we go all.
Think about it.
There’s no change to any DNA with the mRNA vaccines. The mRNA can’t even get into the cell nucleus, and even if it could, there is no known method by which it would perform cuts or inserts into the DNA there. And if it did by some miracle, with nothing to direct changes, they would result in cell death or termination by NK T-cell lymphocyte.
And yes, they are vaccines. If you want to restrict the definition of “vaccine” to just a killed or attenuated pathogen, you’re excluding most vaccines including whooping cough and tetanus. Few vaccines today use the old method of an attenuated or killed pathogen. Those were gen 1 vaccines. Gen 2 vaccines include conjugates, subunit vaccines, toxoids, and others. And gen 3 vaccines including the mRNA platform are also vaccines. The basic concept remains the same. The technology has continued to evolve since the 1950s. The first conjugate vaccine (hib) was licensed back in 1987. There’s no pathogen. A piece of the original bacterium’s shell is attached to a protein carrier. It’s still a vaccine.
Not sure where you’re seeing a change to the definition of herd immunity, but all of my education pointed to the herd immunity threshold as being 1-1/R0 and it is reached when immune individuals (regardless of how they became immune) reach that ratio within a given population. The ability of an infectious agent to continue transmission depends upon the availability of hosts it is able to infect. If it cannot infect a given host (for whatever reason), that host exists outside the vulnerable group.
Excuse my format below. I didn’t want to mess around w/html at the moment. I copied your text, put in a divider and then responded.
text:
There’s no change to any DNA with the mRNA vaccines. The mRNA can’t even get into the cell nucleus, and even if it could, there is no known method by which it would perform cuts or inserts into the DNA there. And if it did by some miracle, with nothing to direct changes, they would result in cell death or termination by NK T-cell lymphocyte.
_______________________________________________
response:
Off target. It is gene therapy in that it directs cells to produce a foreign protein. The mRNA is a delivery system/operating system and any instruction (kill cancer cell/produce changes to combat genetic defect) can be substituted for the protein production. That is how the developers describe it.
As for calling it a vaccine, as I said, I understand using the definition. However, it neither prevents contracting the disease nor prevents the transmission. It is actually a treatment, since all it does is lessen symptoms.
________________________
text:
Not sure where you’re seeing a change to the definition of herd immunity, but all of my education pointed to the herd immunity threshold as being 1-1/R0 and it is reached when immune individuals (regardless of how they became immune) reach that ratio within a given population. The ability of an infectious agent to continue transmission depends upon the availability of hosts it is able to infect. If it cannot infect a given host (for whatever reason), that host exists outside the vulnerable group.
_________________
response:
The discussions about dictionary change of definition centered around the definition of *herd immunity*. Dictionary.com (& possibly others) changed the definition to exclude anything other than acquired immunity via injection.
It was not about definitions from a scientific medical POV (which are not in contention), but about means of achieving that state. It was done to exclude the naturally immune & the recovered. It was politically directed to drive inoculation acceptance.
________________
It’s obvious you want to repetitiously huff & puff only on a few points. Knock yourself out. Peace out.
This is not accurate. The mRNA platform includes the ability to deliver mRNA instructions to a ribosome. Ribosomes build amino acids and proteins based on the codons in an mRNA strand. That's all they can do. You can't do arbitrary things with that. The "operating system" example is from a Ted Talk to lay people. It's an attempt to simplify a complex topic for an audience of people who would otherwise not understand it. It's a clumsy analogy; not an in-depth technical description. Unfortunately, some people take every single word of an analogy literally. This is mRNA to ribosomes.
I suggest you learn more about ribosomes. Doing so will clear up why the above quoted statement is inaccurate.
"it neither prevents contracting the disease nor prevents the transmission"
This is also inaccurate. The Pfizer vaccine blocks 94% of asymptomatic infection and 97% of symptomatic infection per real-world data from Israel (source). The initial Phase 3 clinical trials were not designed to look at sterilizing immunity. They had a narrower scope simply looking at the vaccines' potential to save lives and prevent severe disease in order to simplify the clinical trials and be able to gain usable data more quickly. The more questions - and the more complex questions - you ask, the more data and time you need to answer them.
Exactly. I noticed that too.
Pretty ballsy and equally idiotic of these new sign ups to think we don’t know their intentions.
He’s the same moron who argued that Jesus rose from the dead on Monday.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.