Childish name-calling aside, US courts have not had jurisdiction over civil vaccine liability cases since the passage of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. That came about because a bunch of anti-vaccine fanatics launched so many nuisance suits against vaccine makers that Congress feared we wouldn't be able to get vaccines for things like polio anymore.
So you're complaining about something that's been in effect for 35 years as though it just appeared yesterday. That's dishonest.
No, you’re wrong again.
Moderna has admitted in public, in official government filings, that its jab is an experimental gene therapy.
That’s NOT a vaccine for those of you Pharmbots losing badly on this thread.
So the National Childhood VaccineInjury Act doesn’t apply.
And my question is, since it’s not a vaccine, if it’s so safe, how come you’re not in favor of the FreeMarket?
Oh, by the way. If Congress is so concerned about our safety, how come they allowed the offshoring of so much vaccine manufacture to India and RED China?
Oh, by the way, “Childhood Vaccine Injury Act”. Why does that apply, in the case of, say, a 30-year-old getting cardiomypathy as a presumptive result of the jab (doctors found no other possible proximate causes)?
Oh, by the way. You ducked the question again. Children are largely immune to the coof. Who cares if kids can’t get the jab? So the 1986 Act shouldn’t matter. It’s not like KIDS are ending up in Iron Lungs from the coof.
Oh, by the way. If you’re so concerned about public health, why not prosecute Cuomo for putting the infected in nursing homes, instead of using the purpose-built convalescent centers (in Madison Square Garden, right?) which sat empty, along with a dedicated Navy Hospital ship.
This isn’t even a moderate challenge anymore.
Whatever they’re paying you, you’re getting ripped off.