No, you’re wrong again.
Moderna has admitted in public, in official government filings, that its jab is an experimental gene therapy.
That’s NOT a vaccine for those of you Pharmbots losing badly on this thread.
So the National Childhood VaccineInjury Act doesn’t apply.
And my question is, since it’s not a vaccine, if it’s so safe, how come you’re not in favor of the FreeMarket?
Oh, by the way. If Congress is so concerned about our safety, how come they allowed the offshoring of so much vaccine manufacture to India and RED China?
Oh, by the way, “Childhood Vaccine Injury Act”. Why does that apply, in the case of, say, a 30-year-old getting cardiomypathy as a presumptive result of the jab (doctors found no other possible proximate causes)?
Oh, by the way. You ducked the question again. Children are largely immune to the coof. Who cares if kids can’t get the jab? So the 1986 Act shouldn’t matter. It’s not like KIDS are ending up in Iron Lungs from the coof.
Oh, by the way. If you’re so concerned about public health, why not prosecute Cuomo for putting the infected in nursing homes, instead of using the purpose-built convalescent centers (in Madison Square Garden, right?) which sat empty, along with a dedicated Navy Hospital ship.
This isn’t even a moderate challenge anymore.
Whatever they’re paying you, you’re getting ripped off.
Moderna has not admitted that its jab is an experimental gene therapy. I’ve read the document you’re referring to, and it doesn’t say what you wish it did.
Your fantasy isn’t real. Your narrative is false.
No where in these CDC guidelines does it state how many amplifications can be used while still claiming a positive test. I have recently read that up to 40 amplifications have been used on unvaccinated people to determine s a positive. After vaccination the maximum number of amplifications permitted will be 24. I have looked on the CDC website but cannot find it there. If this is true, it is surely leading to skewed numbers.