Posted on 05/02/2021 4:52:12 AM PDT by MtnClimber
If the 2020 election were as well run as touted, then the Biden-centric media should be cheerleading the effort.
While an uncertain public awaits results from the Arizona election audit, the immediate major media outcry, prematurely denouncing it, should be viewed as the audit's hitting a major media nerve. The media's reaction vividly demonstrates their fear of a searching re-examination of the election purity they have so arrogantly and unwaveringly proclaimed.
After all, if this election were as well run as touted (with the customary admission to the mere occasional and inevitable, but insignificant, error), then the Biden-centric media should be cheerleading the effort. Shouldn't the audit, to use a favored media word, be anticipated to "debunk" the claims of widespread irregularities?
The media have drawn great succor from numerous court cases turning down challenges to the 2020 election results. However, these claims raised issues not properly cognizable by our judicial system. Ordering a recount is one thing; relitigating a multimillion-vote election is quite another. It looks tremendously suspicious that, after Republican poll-watchers were banished, massive blocs of Detroit votes were introduced in the early morning, with 95% Biden selection. But what exactly is a smart person in black robes supposed to do with this tableau? Overturn the election without taking evidence? Convene a three-month trial with numerous witnesses and experts, while Biden and Trump cool their heels? A wise court should toss the case, as each reviewing jurist did. But this rejection should not be seen as validating the election process,
The election process itself, not the judicial system, is supposed to be administered so as to provide the public with confidence in the announced tallies. For this reason, the only widely recognized judicial remedy, as in Bush v. Gore, is an order to recount,
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
The left does not deal in facts so nothing will change their minds. I don’t think they would even care if the election was stolen. The ends justify the means and all of that.
Fixed it
Of course they do. That’s their M.O.
They dont care.
Not too long ago I was arguing with a liberal about the stolen election. He said to me that while he doesnt believe that Biden won thanks to cheating (I didnt believe him that he believed that), if Biden did indeed win due to voter fraud, he’s ok with it “as long as it got trump out of the white house.”
So funny how the Left scream for recounts when they are behind (over and over until their guy wins!), but are against this...
WHAT media? Ya mean the PR arm of the Liberal establishment ??
I don't think the left - both the entities that committed the fraud in the election and their PR arm in the media - care about the audit or are in any way worried that their puppets will be removed from office. The left has been increasingly getting away with anything and everything - including murder. Just look at Clinton's abuses related to classified information, obama providing firearms to drug cartels, cash to Iran, Hunter's abuses of drugs and underage girls.
The left feels pretty immune to prosecution and consequences. Unfortunately they have good cause to feel that way. What I believe they are afraid of, why they are pushing back so hard on the audit, is they don't want their methods of fraud exposed and dealt with. Whatever they did, worked pretty darn well for them. I'm sure they'd like to do it again. But now with Georgia clamping down, and potentially Arizona exposing not only that they committed fraud, but how it was done... That's why they are worried.
True. The ONLY “morally right thing to do” was to get Trump out of the White House.
NOTHING else mattered. NOTHING else was acceptable.
They truly do not care how they win. The only thing that matters is that they win. Everything and everyone is expendable in achieving that goal.
The Democrats response to cheating inn the 2020 eletion will be like harry Reid’s response when confronted about lying that Mitt Romney didn’t pay taxes for 10 tears. “Well he lost ddidn’t he?”
The newspaper reported general news but also party activities, presenting them as almost constant successes. Guidelines for propagandists urged that all posters, insofar as the police allowed, contain propaganda for it, and all meetings should be announced in it, although reports should be sent to the Editorial Department, which would then forward corrected versions to the paper.
The New York Times? No, Goebbel’s Völkischer Beobachter.
I agree, they don’t care about facts. What they do care about is losing the narrative that they have created. That is a problem for them. And if there is ANY honest folks at the FBI and Justice, then prosecutions will proceed if the results warrant it.
The courts reaction, we don’t know what to do so we did nothing.
The media is mostly a rabid activist collection of libtards with a one side leftist view. They have no more credibility than any other loudmouth leftist.
“The left does not deal in facts so nothing will change their minds”
“It’s Easier to Fool People Than It Is to Convince Them That They Have Been Fooled.” – Mark Twain.
So in short, they don’t believe in elections, or representative democracy as a way of resolving differences.
Along with that goes: “If they weren’t cheating in the election, why were they trying so hard?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.