grey_whiskers wrote: “You ducked the question, troll-boi, and repeated your fallacies.”
Evidently, you’d rather not defend the premise of this article, that “...these shots are NOT vaccines, but bioweapons designed to kill human beings. (ie, fatalities)”
So the first half of the premise is transparently true by the manufacturers' own admissions.
The second half contains a fallacy: that bioweapons are necessarily designed to kill people.
I already covered that upthread.
You get your impressions from James Bond movies, it seems.
I think this virus was bioengineered; the modifications to the spike to make it more infective to humans make it at least a possible weapon-under-investigation. Not all weapons need to be designed to kill.
For the mRNA jab, the marketwatch link as well as the video I posted upthread with the doctor explaining how the spike proteins affect the endothelial cells in the blood vessels, make it clear that the spike protein was KNOWN to cause all kinds of problems.
So why inject the entire population with an untested dangerous artificial modality which has never worked before, over OTC mediations which have been around 40 years, which Dr. Fauci himself said over a decade ago were magic cures for coronavirus?