Posted on 04/30/2021 12:31:49 AM PDT by ransomnote
(h/t greeneyes)
ransomnote: Below, I'll post the content from the web page hosting the video. Here, I'll post the 3 topics planned for this video. They would like to discuss theories regarding symptoms and concerns regarding the vaccinated regarding:
1. Shedding
2. Infertility
3. Blood Supply
At the 7 minute mark, a physician describes reported incidents (children with bloody noses, blood clots in men, reproductive changes in women etc.)
Basically, are the vaccinated 'something' to the unvaccinated?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From the text under the Video on Bitchute:
Ever since reports have surfaced in recent days that people who have chosen NOT to receive the experimental COVID-19 shots but have been exposed to those who have received them, and have suffered what appear to be infections coming from these fully "vaccinated" people, affecting mainly women who have reported menstruation difficulties, heavy bleeding, miscarriages, and reduction of breast milk, I have been watching my newsfeed to see if any of the dissenting doctors and scientists we feature regularly here at Health Impact News would address these issues.
Fortunately, a team of 5 doctors in the U.S., all of whom we have featured in the past here at Health Impact News and are highly qualified to address this topic, just held a round-table discussion a couple of days ago to address these issues.
The issues they discuss affect ALL of us in the U.S. (and around the world) right now, and it is imperative that you take 79 minutes of your time to watch this video.
Not only do these highly qualified doctors discuss why they think this is happening, they also give practical advice at the end about what we can be doing right now to protect ourselves and stop this attack on the human race by the Globalists seeking to reduce the world's population.
Every single one of these doctors believe that these shots are NOT vaccines, but bioweapons designed to kill human beings.
Whatever else you are doing when you come across this video, it is highly unlikely that anything else you do the rest of your day will be more important than watching this video so you can be informed of the evil effects of these injections that are being censored in the corporate media and Big Tech social media.
Then share this video with as many people as you can.
Category | Health & Medical |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
I
Thank you for pointing out the individual uniqueness of human beings. I am like your wife with respect to having reacted badly to some common OTC meds. For that reason, I am hesitant about taking HCQ and Ivermectin, and even though I have some of the latter on hand for emergency use (horse paste version), I would never take it prophylactically, and even if I were to need it therapeutically, I would start out with a half-dose for my weight to see what happened.
And that is another thing I don’t understand, regarding the Covid shots in particular - why the one size fits all approach? I see people on these threads getting jabbed, who range from 80 to 300 lbs if they mention their weight, so why do the manufacturers not scale the dosage accordingly like they do with Ivermectin? Or do they, and I’m just not aware of it?
LOL
How True. Attacks but no refutation of the facts.
1) Stop licking your pyloric valve from underneath from the inside, and pull your head out.
2) Explain why you settled on the number 90% in light of:
a) Bill Gates' (in)famous quote said 10%-15%
b) The US has a long-standing policy of "we will respond to bioweapons with a nuclear strike"
c) Why you assume any bioweapon must have been conceived, developed, and deployed in the way it is portrayed in James Bond movies? (Why not a weapon designed to generally gum up the works of other countries' economies, or in concert with the Dems, to allow them to push for remote, mail-in voting so they can cheat and replace The Donald?)
d) Explain to me why we don't need polio virus boosters or smallpox every six months
e) Explain why the bureacrats shut down Ivermectin and HCQ by performing "rigged" studies which did not use Zinc, and applied only to already-hospitalized patients, at which point even the proponents of these treatments said they wouldn't be effective?
f) Explain why they settled on an mRNA treatment which has a history of killing test animals, rather than a killed-virus approach?
g) Explain why Fauci funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan
h) Explain why Fauci holds a number of related patents and owns considerable stock in some of these companies (you'd think his govt. job would have forbidden the stocks anyway due to conflict-of-interest)
Awesome. Two huge thumbs up!
Also, the *danger* appears to be from close proximity indoors over several hours with more or less intimacy, such as touching, sharing breath through proximity while speaking,exchange of bodily fluids, etc.
I have read many more than 7 reports of clots, including purpura and other bleeding signs, including at least one of a young female bleeding from the eye. As for deaths, yes, the reports available from various self-reported sequalae all over the net from all political stances/ages/sexes indicates many more deaths than being admitted to officially. Many are reported 2nd hand of a parent/grandparent/child. Because these are not glaringly novel incidents, they can mostly be explained away as other than the vax. However, I always lean toward: “The eventual preponderance of anecdote will, at some point, become accepted data.”
More details on these points in particular please? I can haz sources?
The “shedding” myth is exactly that - another myth propagated by the likes of Tenpenny, Northrup, et al.
Vaccinated people DO NOT “shed” virus OR spike proteins. That’s just outright ridiculous.
Doesn’t stop yet more silly info from spreading like wildfire across the internet though, just like all the other vaccine myths.
If any of you don’t want to take the vaccine, fine - don’t take it! I sure don’t care. But please, please, please quit spreading these ridiculous myths that are coming out of quacks like Tenpenny, Northrup and others. It’s really beneath the typical credibility of FR in a big way.
This is an excellent timeline.
Could you include somewhere in there something I have noticed and not seen explicated?
EVERY time the media and Congress screamed for something: lockdown/masks/PPE/ventilators/field hospitals/vaccine, it appears that the louder and more insistent their demands, whatever they demanded has eventually turned out to be more harmful than the infection.
Almost as though they were told to demand something even more injurious.
Awesome. ALL the way up, too.
I'll bet you still couldn't find it with both hands if we went on and spotted you 7 of the 8 remaining fingers.
Is this high school, or FR?
End of story...this is dividing us further.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Biowarfare against the US is everyone’s concern. Personally, I’m AGAINST it.
grey_whiskers wrote: “Here’s your homework assignment:”
So, you would rather drag red herrings around instead of explaining how a business model built upon killing it’s customers can be successful?
‘Big Pharma’ would have to be in on it for your conspiracy to distribute bioweapons to work. Now why would ‘Big Pharma’ want to kill it’s customers?
For you, kindergarten.
Do you have any peer-reviewed studies proving that vaccinated people don't shed mRNA (e.g. one possible mechanism is those receiving the attenuated adenovirus carrier, upon co-infection with respiratory-borne flu viruses, and the two viruses exchange genetic material. Voila, a flu virus with RNA for spike protein).
Who says it has to be fatalities?
Who says it has to be 90% ?
Nothing to be surprised at, the dishonesty of the Branch Covidians.
Yes. THere are doctors trying to find their way past the censors. The Frontline Doctors were banned and all they said was treatments are available. Many doctors under attack for talking about medications that work.
A doctor in Canada had his license to practice medicine threatened just for asking why negative side effects like anaphylaxis were occurring at much higher rates than Moderna said. Many of his 900 Moderna vax patients have been experiencing slowly evolving neurological problems but his job is on the line if he alerts the public.
Few docs have dared to say the obvious, and it will cost them.
Do you have any peer reviewed studies that prove vaccinated people DO “shed virus” or spike protein?
Didn’t think so.
How about even a link to ANY credible source that says this happens?
On second thought, I already know you don’t - so forget it. Replying to you any further is a complete and total waste of time..so I won’t bother.
Just a note that we really are at our FR best if, after arguing our position, we accept the fact that someone is or is not going to be vaccinated. Ultimately, it’s an individual’s choice. And we should respect that choice and not get upset / triggered / etc if someone chooses something that we would not choose.
Ransomenote, Why would not listen to an actual Dr who is here on FR?
I was pretty clear about why I reject his assertions.
Wouldn’t that person have a bunch more credibility than some crazy on a Youtube video?
No.
Those doctors aren't crazy. They put their names, credentials, training out there and go on record. We have no idea who gas_dr is, what his training is, what his record is or was if he ever practiced.
Gas_dr routinely argues against evidence, argues against 'science' to carry a point being made by the MSM. gas_dr is far less credible than the average FReeper.
I've posted elsewhere on FR that China provided what it claims is the genome to the virus in Jan, and vax developers like Moderna picked up China's genome and based their vaccines on it. Why would China want to help us after their Wuhan lab, which Fauci has funded, and will continue to fund, claimed to release a deadly virus?
So our corrupt medical wing of the government took the handoff from China and is implementing it on the American public and you're calling those of us who reject this attack 'haters'?
They actually think that the last remaining superpower, with all the intellectual, technological, military and moral might of the US, can’t come up with a shot that actually kills people.
China wants to be the only superpower and by giving us a biowarfare agent and having bought/paid for arms of our government and medical establishment force it on people, China won't have to worry about a 'gun behind every blade of grass'.
That the best bioweapon we can develop, despite being administered hundreds of millions of times, has resulted in something very close to zero deaths.
That's shilly talk. ADE and other harms come months later, and that's why the mad rush to force a vaccine that no one needs ASAP.
It’s almost as if the anti-vaxxers are trying to shake our confidence in what America is capable of - something I’d expect of the CCP.
Your handlers are going to cut your pay if this is the best you can come up with. I am against this biowarfare and tyranny, and you aren't.
grey_whiskers wrote: “You ducked the question, troll-boi, and repeated your fallacies.”
Evidently, you’d rather not defend the premise of this article, that “...these shots are NOT vaccines, but bioweapons designed to kill human beings. (ie, fatalities)”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.