Posted on 04/25/2021 8:08:42 PM PDT by ransomnote
The CDC is far behind in publishing reports of adverse events it receives. As of April 6, only 25% of actual reports of adverse events were available in VAERS. In the past month as rate of vaccination increased, the CDC drastically reduced the rate that it now publishes received reports. This means that there may be at minimum four times the number of strokes published in VAERS already reported to the CDC.
Even though the CDC is underreporting adverse events for Covid-19 'vaccines' by simply not publishing them, the remaining reports which are published already account 11% of all adverse events in (30+ years of) VAERS after just 4 months of 'vaccine's' administration.
The Covid-19 vaccines are the 2nd largest group of reports in VAERS with 86,891 PUBLISHED reports, and this constitutes a mere fraction of what CDC has actually received.
Before Covid-19 emerged in 2020, Harvard conducted a study in which it determined that less than 1% of actual adverse reactions following vaccination are ever reported to the CDC.
With accounts of drastic medical staff reductions and supposedly overwhelming numbers of Covid-19 cases to deal with, what are the chances that medical staff have time to report deaths to VAERS even if they wanted to?
Many deaths following vaccination, particularly in nursing homes, and being dismissed as Covid-19 deaths when there is no evidence to support it.
An impassioned CNA tending to the elderly made an impassioned plea for the public to wake up and realize the elderly are 'dropping like flies' in response to the vaccination. When many of his clients abruptly died following vaccination, his supervisor dismissed the deaths as the result of a 'super spreader' depiste offering zero evidence.
"Covid-19" and 'superspreader' are convenient, default excuses to dismiss the actual impacts the Covid 'vaccines' on the elderly. Statements by family or staff as to the vibrant quality of life enjoyed by the patient which ended abruptly when vaccinated are dismissed with words like, "He was old..." and "It was her time..."
A thread on FR details the many reasons why cause of death is often not investigated, despite all the 'rules' involved, and that such determinations are largely a bueurocrtaic decision.
A Covid Death? The Bureaucracy Decides (freerepublic.com)
With abrupt deaths dismissed as natural causes or 'too hard to tell' or 'not enough resources to find out,' how many of other patients just might be experiencing strokes following vaccination which are then attributed to age?
Here's a patient record of stroke in VAERS:
| 93 years old | 15-30 days after vaccination | 1204231-1 | Suffered from a stroke on 4/3/21 from a blood clot in his brain stem. Prior to vaccine he was healthy and 100% independent, still drove, did grocery shopping, yard work, etc. Now he cannot move his left side and was placed on hospice as he has lost his will to eat, drink, or live. |
The data set I pulled from VAERS included all records containing 'stroke in the event description. All records containing 'stroke' in the adverse event description are shown here (freerepublic.com).
Some instances wherein a physician typed 'stroke ruled out,' or other neutral reference, likely occurred but those records which I reviewed (approximately 200) did not have more than 2 examples of that notation.
Further, there are other medical terms for stroke which I did not include in my search so some records are missing there.
There are many examples like this in VAERS for all ages, but particularly among the elderly, in which the account goes something like, "He was fine until she got the vaccine...." or "She was active and when I left the room. she was working on her puzzles and I came back and she was gone..."
[Note: You may want to review the record of strokes reported following vaccination (Covid-19, VAERS) I posted to FR here. I believe you'll be struck, as I was, by the number of times you see that overall, onset is relatively soon after vaccination.]
Deaths and inujries from strokes in the vaccinated elderly are too rapidly ignored by the CDC and others. The CDC will swiftly declare cause of death 'Covid-19' based on supposition without testing, or with a positive Covid-19 within 60 days of death, but reported cases of abrupt stroke within days of vaccination are deemed impossible to determine and dismissed as irrelevent.
Why are there so many published reports of strokes for Covid-19 Vaccines in the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System? Here are the top 5 vaccines with the most published stroke records in VAERS.
886 of the total number of 2254 of adverse event description 'stroke' reported to VAERS are for Covid-19 'vaccines' (approx 5 records are not classified by manufacturer). That's 39% of all published reports of strokes for all vaccines in the VAERS database.
How can Covid-19 vaccination records amass 39% of event records with 'stroke' in 4 months of administration, even though VAERS is not publishing most of the Covid-19 vax reports it has received?
I routinely report on total deaths in VAERS, but it's clear upon reading the records that the medical staff often do not know what happens to their patient after transferred or discharged from the ER or facility. The deaths published in VAERS are likely unreliable and underreported.
The CDC is no longer making much effort to publish reports receives for Covid-19, but about a month ago, it was publishing 25% of them.
So the current count of 867 'stroke' references multiplied by a factor of (at extreme minium) 4 would yield 3,468 'stroke' instances reported to the CDC. This number is really too small because the CDC curtailed reporting and so the factor is now greater than 4. But let's work with 3468 'stroke' references for now.
Remember, less than 1% of vaccination adverse events was reported to VAERS before Covid-19 impacted staffing and resources. This likely means facilities said to be understaffed and overwhelmed are making a fraction of previous effort to report to VAERS now.
But let's use 1% to calculate how many strokes are likely occuring following vaccination to calculate how many strokes may be occurring following vaccination which are never reported to VAERS.
This could indicate, via very modest estimates, that 346,800 strokes overall following Covid-19 vaccinations.
I'm not saying the vaccinations are medically responsible, because no investigation has begun to gather any evidence that strokes are an issue at all. Since Fauci and 8 others at NIAID own patents in the Moderna vaccine, I don't believe any investigation will ever occur.
I'm not saying my estimates are not without error. The degree to which the CDC has decided not to spend money to hire data entry persons to update VAERS has no doubt contributed to the weaknesses of this kind of estimate. If the IRS 'fell behind' to the degree the CDC has 'fallen behind', I do believe the IRS would spend money on data entry resources to catch up, if only to collect taxe funds.
The CDC is verbose in its promises that when records of adverse events are received and reviewed, all necessary medical oversight occurs to determine if the events recorded have any bearing on the safety of the vaccine.
WHERE the CDC when it comes to strokes? Even f they disagree with my math, Covid-19 'vaccines' account for 39% of stroke records published in VAERS. The CDC knows its database is not up to date, and that many never report to VAERS.
I know. I know. I've been told many times that all untimely deaths are reported to VAERS or investigated (autopsy) by law, but it was not happening before, and it certainly isn't happening now (links above).
Personally I think my estimate of potentially 350,000 strokes occurring after Covid-19 vaccinations is both modest and defensible, given the circumstances. This estimate is meant to encompasses published, unpublished and unreported strokes following Covid-19 vaccination (e.g., 'he was old...'). Note that the CDC and others estimate that less than 800,000 strokes occur annually in the U.S.
How many would it take before the CDC takes an interest in finding out why published Covid vaccine adverse event reccords account for 36% of all strokes in VAER for all vaccines? Is the CDC interested in knowing that over 10% of all adverse event records (all symptoms) in VAERS are for Covid-19 vaccinations, or is that why the CDC curtailed publishing received reports in VAERS?
Forget the estimates and percentages. Is the existance of over 800 records with 'stroke' listed in the adverse events description getting ANY attention?
With no displayed interest in the records of strokes in VAERS for Covid-19 vaccines, I have little hope anyone will take an interest in the 747 records of anaphylaxis or any other significant injury. I suppose they don't want to contribute to 'vaccine hesitancy."
Why the hell aren’t people being tested before getting the so called vaccine? The amount of blind following and medical malfeasance going on right now is disgusting. And I sincerely hope that the schools and businesses requiring vaccines arensued out of existence if even one person dies or is disabled or permanently ill from this unproven crap.
Best wishes for a speedy and full recovery.
Yes but should this promising technology be inflicted on otherwise young and healthy people.
It is evidence without error bars assigned; nonetheless, the more severe the reaction, and the closer in time to the jab (especially when there were no symptoms consonant with the possible adverse event, prior to the jab), then the more likely it is a direct result.
In other words, shove it where the sun don't shine, troll.
You and the other trolls were not so giddy about loudly downplaying all alleged cases of death by COVID.
Why the sudden reversal?
It is after all, about safety, in either case.
The Lancet reports 20% or more of COVID patients have Deep Vein Thrombosis (most often in the legs; the risk is breakaway clots which travel to the lungs or brain).
False association; those deaths reported to VAERS will likely be those in a relatively short time frame after the jab.
And your makeshift handwaving does not account for adverse events short of death.
What would be interesting is to parse the VAERS by age group of jab recipient, and by existing comorbidities, if any.
Not that I have read... but there is so much media today. VAERS could prove critically helpful in these mass media days but... As I ask: is the govt competent to manage this data?
***The Lancet reports 20% or more of COVID patients have Deep Vein Thrombosis (most often in the legs; the risk is breakaway clots which travel to the lungs or brain).***
While there may be some relation between CoViD and DVT, I know of no connection of DVT with the vaccines, especially the mRNA vaccines. Of course VAERS could prove pivotal in compiling, documenting and reporting such coincidences -- if the system is effectively applied.
In light of such possible shortcomings, such blogs as this might be to some advantage.
LOL!
You can’t even find some stupid, click-bait, blog to support you LOL!
Disgusting.
A girl from India we know could not get pregnant. After years of Doctor visits she decided to see a nutritionist. The nutritionist told her to eat red meat for iron. After doing so, she conceived. Notice the elites want to cut our red meat supply. Perhaps the vaccines also serve a related purpose
Prayers for you digger!
God Bless
That’s a good post.
VAERS is there for ANY report of ANY problem. They’ll figure out what it means ln time.
There’s also another portal to report things, V-Safe I believe it’s called.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vsafe.html
An inordinately disturbed individual... ignore! ...or report to VAERS! :)
The spike protein introduces clotting even without entering cells.
Experimental evidence in vitro not in vivo.
OTOH, test tubes have confounding factors which are much more easily allowed for.
Because of the novel nature of these vaccines, an app based system, VSAFE, was developed and widely implemented to report safety and side effect issues. Unfortunately, I cannot even express the number of times patients in my office demonstrated that the app does not work – all that happened was the spinning blue ball. In fact, when my own wife tried to report her side effects through the app, she gave up after 4-5 attempts. Never able to connect. The whole experience reminds one of the last time the Feds tried computer apps – the disastrous Obamacare sign up.
My grim job this week was to report a vaccine related death to the authorities. I have had to do this type of reporting on other occasions in my career, with other drugs, both approved and research trials, with both deaths and morbid complications. In every single instance in the past, without exception, I have been contacted within 1-2 hours by either the FDA or the CDC. They questioned me, discussed the particulars with me, and a collaboration was begun.
This death was much different.
Interesting... worth keeping in mind given the nut cases trying to control all human behavior these days.
For my part, I don't expect to conceive in any case. :^D
Thanks for that report.
Yeah, typical gov app.
Sorry to hear of the response to that death.
Gov sucks.
A little about the patient situation. She had her vaccine about 8 AM on a weekday. It was the 2nd shot. Very soon thereafter, she felt electric shocks over her entire body. Later, she was having trouble speaking and could not stand up. She began having severe problems swallowing. I advised to go immediately to the ER. I will not go into details here but suffice it to say, she was having a profound neurologic problem. It was not a simple stroke nor was it a blood clotting issue. Because of the timing of symptom initiation, it was clear to me that the vaccine was likely involved. She was diagnosed with a condition that is very very unusual and is often associated with vaccine administration. She had 5 weeks of very severe pain and did not recover. She was eventually placed on hospice and passed away. Before she died, she told me to make sure that everyone knows that these vaccines are not as safe as advertised. Believe you me, her family is doing everything they can to make sure that this story is known all over the community. The patient herself was a very well-loved individual here – and this has been a blow to the entire area.
I am a licensed physician in a US state. I am board bertified in Internal Medicine. I made every effort to immediately report this death to the federal officials. I called the FDA and ended up in voicemail hell. I called the CDC and was literally hung up on twice. Again, please contrast that reception to what I describe above in previous “non-crisis” years.
After multiple attempts, I finally decided to report to VAERS. This was almost a week ago. To date, the VAERS has no record of my patient. All that I have received is an email to confirm my submission. No one from any agency has made any effort to contact me in any way. It was of little comfort to note in in the New York Times, that the physicians trying to report one of the sentinel J&J stroke cases got a similar “hang up in your face” response from the FDA/CDC.
I want to reiterate – a patient has died. A board-certified internist feels this is likely vaccine-related. And no one has made any effort to contact me. None. A complete departure from the past. And this is a stringent safety-reporting system?
Thanks again.
“She was diagnosed with a condition that is very very unusual and is often associated with vaccine administration. “
So, you’re saying this particular vaccine was not the cause?
That any vaccine would likely have had the same effect?
I see the relationship with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 and the formation of microclots, but the relation to the mRNA vaccines and iron is not clear to me - despite these two footnotes:
↵Pretorius, E., Vermeulen, N., Bester, J. & Lipinski, B. 2013a. Novel use of scanning electron microscopy for detection of iron-induced morphological changes in human blood. Microsc Res Tech, 76, 268–71.Google Scholar↵Pretorius, E., Vermeulen, N., Bester, J., Lipinski, B. & Kell, D. B. 2013b. A novel method for assessing the role of iron and its functional chelation in fibrin fibril formation: the use of scanning electron microscopy. Toxicol Mech Methods, 23, 352–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
I don’t know. I would interpret his remark “condition that is very very unusual and is often associated with vaccine administration” means that they likely have only seen it in that context.
You can read the whole thing in the link I provided earlier in this thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.