What’s the problem? There is a chain of command for a reason. I’d be p!$$ed too if a subordinate went behind my back to my boss.
He spoke to a congressman.
U
You are a despicable, double-dealing piece of shiite.
Your attitude not only steams, it stinks and kills grass.
The subordinate knew his boss was a traitor to America, and was obstructing all efforts to root out DC and electoral corruption.
Not everyone is a communist, calm down.
As if there's a normal chain of command at the DOJ?
The "chain of command" above Barr was president Trump. He would have approved of the investigation. Add to that, how many times do you think Barr checks with his "boss" before doing something?
Would you be prone to undermining your boss at the behest of the Deep State?
Yep, that is how I see this. A boss is just telling a subordinate to stay in his lane.
AG Barr was sold to us as a man of integrity who would put right what went wrong under his predecessor, Sessions.
And in the beginning that seemed to be the case -- Mueller put Russia-Russia-Russia to rest -- but then, as time went on... what happened to the Durham Report?
Why were there no prosecutions of corrupt officials?
Most important: why did Barr turn a blind eye to the 2020 election?
Posters on this thread say Barr was deep-state from way back -- was he?
But maybe Barr was also the best Trump could hope for?
None of it makes sense, unless... unless... a wildly improbable future scenario where Trump-reformed Republicans take majorities in 2022 and Trump himself wins a landslide in 2024.
I can see it, can almost taste it, but how likely is it?
And if it happens, then suddenly everything here makes sense.