Yet there are still true believers posting here on Free Republic. I question why we are so tolerant of an enemy psyops campaign being waged on this site.
|
Posted on 04/16/2021 4:25:12 PM PDT by ransomnote
"
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Chile: 100-year-old woman denied access to supermarket for lack of digital health pass
*****
The elderly woman, Isolina Grandón, who has lived alone since her sister died, explained to the Chilean media program Aqui Somos Todos of Channel 13 that she does not have access to the internet, nor to a cell phone. In Chile, only those with health passes obtained from the website www.comisariavirtual.cl can travel or enter commercial venues.
______
This is what the Demo-commies, RINOS and DS want for the US.
(Are) you “english as second language”?
^^^^^ - implied
Has anyone noticed how the jowls on people are drooping due to the lack of expression from wearing masks? I was shocked to see how some of my friends who were required to wear masks have aged this past year.
Another race against time. Can this filth be exposed before Biden crashes the economy?
Is that photo an actual photo of the human/monkey hybrid?
If so, that could be the expression on our faces when we finally encounter the ETs.
thanks for that.
1. I don’t take a flu shot.
2. I usually get 2 things a season 1 flu and 1 cold.
3. I haven’t had either since 2018-2019.
4. I quit smoking about 4 years ago and I now take a whole bunch of RX plus an overkill of D3 and a calcium\magnesium\zinc supplement daily.
I don’t know if #4 has anything to do with #3.
I also haven’t had COVID that I know of. Tomorrow I am going to get an antibodies test.
A lot of anecdotal stuff that shows the “science” isn’t.
It’s all upside down and nobody seems to know the straight skinny on COVID and its cures\theraputics.
I may be having this in my head only, but I seem to recall Pres. Trump’s first gut reaction was to “let it rip”.
Turns out, if “they” used “COVID only” as a cause of death, “letting it rip” was probably the right thing to do, hence treat it like the Flu.
Lockdowns work. The countries that are totally fascist had no trouble with the pandemic. It’s gone.
We are looking for a way to persuade and still be kind, to paraphrase Robert Frost.
Please see Post #363 this thread. :-P
I’m with you...mask...
slow down the video to .5 and it sure seems conclusive...if I believe my lyin eyes.
:: Tomorrow I am going to get an antibodies test. ::
I can only ask, “why?”.
Does science know what those specific antibodies are?
Can they be sure without subjecting them to the elusive COVID-19 virus and watching the results (Live on SEM-TV!)
Are you being charged (or your insurance)?
Do a little research on T-cell immunity.
Hint: T-cells make the antibodies from “memory” when exposed to the virus. All T-cells are T-cells, they are not virus/allergen specific.
One very nice priest told me once, when I voiced concerns about Francis, “Just keep your focus on Jesus Christ and His words and you will be alright.”
Love that sentiment❣
Aha.
https://archive.defense.gov/pubs/Law-of-War-Manual-June-2015.pdf
There are pages and pages of sub paragraphs, but these is the top level heading
2015 version pdf
5.5 RULES ON CONDUCTING ASSAULTS, BOMBARDMENTS, AND OTHER ATTACKS
Combatants may conduct assaults, bombardments, and other attacks, but a number of rules apply to these operations.
5.5.1 Notes on Terminology – Protection From “Attack As Such,” “Being Made the Object of Attack,” “Direct Attack,” and “Intentional Attack” Versus Protection From “Incidental” or “Collateral” Harm. A variety of formulations have been commonly used to distinguish between: (1) the protection from being made the object of attack (i.e., the attack is purposefully directed against that person or object) and (2) the protection from the incidental effects of an attack (i.e., the object or person is not the object of the attack, but is collaterally harmed by the attack).
These situations are treated quite differently under the law of war.57 In the former case, it is often said that protected persons and objects are protected “as such,”58 from “direct attack,”59 from “intentional attack,”60 “from attack directed exclusively against them,”61 or from being made the “object of attack.”62 Sometimes a combination of these formulations has been used.
In some cases, a text may not use any qualification (e.g., “direct attack” or “as such,”), but is understood to refer only to the first category of protection. For example, Article 52 of AP I provides that “[a]ttacks shall be limited strictly to military objectives.”63 However, this article has been understood to comprise only an obligation not to direct attacks against civilian objects and not to address the question of incidental harm resulting from attacks directed against military
57 See, e.g., United States v. Ohlendorf, et al. (The Einsatzgruppen Case), IV TRIALS OF WAR CRIMINALS BEFORE THE NMT 411, 467 (“A city is bombed for tactical purposes; communications are to be destroyed, railroads wrecked, ammunition plants demolished, factories razed, all for the purpose of impeding the military. In these operations it inevitably happens that nonmilitary persons are killed. This is an incident, a grave incident to be sure, but an unavoidable corollary of battle action. The civilians are not individualized. The bomb falls, it is aimed at the railroad yards, houses along the tracks are hit and many of their occupants killed. But that is entirely different, both in fact and in law, from an armed force marching up to these same railroad tracks, entering those houses abutting thereon, dragging out the men, women, and children and shooting them.”).
58 See, e.g., 1956 FM 27-10 (Change No. 1 1976) ¶40a (“Customary international law prohibits the launching of attacks (including bombardment) against either the civilian population as such or individual civilians as such.”) (emphasis added).
59 2004 UK MANUAL ¶5.3.2 (“A civilian is a non-combatant. He is protected from direct attack and is to be protected against dangers arising from military operations.”) (emphasis added).
60 Department of Defense, Report to the Senate and House Appropriations Committees regarding international policies and procedures regarding the protection of natural and cultural resources during times of war, Jan. 19, 1993, reprinted as Appendix VIII in Patrick J. Boylan, Review of the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (The Hague Convention of 1954) 201, 204 (1993) (“Like any civilian object, cultural property is protected from intentional attack so long as it is not used for military purposes, or to shield military objectives from attack.”).
61 See, e.g., 1956 FM 27-10 (Change No. 1 1976) ¶25 (“However, it is a generally recognized rule of international law that civilians must not be made the object of attack directed exclusively against them.”) (emphasis added).
62 AP I art. 51(2) (“The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack.”) (emphasis added).
63 AP I art. 52(2).
Now I don’t know...here’s Dr. Fauci on Meet The Press in November.
In comparison ? still looks like a mask in the gab video...
I read some of these tweets and this does not sound to me like DJT. The sense of humor is completely different. Plus Trump has his own brand of gravitas, which is missing here. He is not silly. He is basically serious and sincere.
————-
I agree. Some of the tweets are funny, sort of, but pretty silly and juvenile. It doesn’t sound like Trump to me either. ( I agree, he does have a sense of humor but not juvenile, this doesn’t seem like his).
Wait...wait....I know. Never mind
IMO due to the advancement of technology and how it is integrated with countries and their citizens everyday lives, we are in a cyberwar. This was one reason President Trump formed a “Space Force”. The Laws of War Manual appears to be worded for a conventional war.
Now cyberwar could be classified as other, or in the alternative the manual at some point needs to be updated because cyberwar has the potential to cause more harm than a conventional war ever dreamed of, i.e. knock out a power grid, override control commands to a water system, disable a country’s satellites et al. Israel, if one is to read between the lines ,has shown the effectiveness of cyberwarfare by what they have done to Iran’s nuclear program.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.