Posted on 04/16/2021 8:40:20 AM PDT by Marinario
PRE 1967 'SIX-DAY WAR': ARABS' WAR BOOTY WOMEN - FANTASY
Prior to the '67 war Arab defeat, the hype on Arab street was extatic.
The masses fantasized "romantically" about ancient Arab-Islsmic culture of women in war booty.
The War of Arab Destruction that Became the "Palestinian Nakba"
By: Dr. Yohai Sella | May 21, 2010
Originally published in Middle Eastern Magazine.
Every year, on May 15, the Arabs celebrate the events of the "Palestinian Nakba" in memory of the efforts of the Arab states to destroy the Jewish community in Israel - an effort that turned into a military defeat and an Arab catastrophe. Whenever the Arabs celebrate the "Palestinian Nakba", it is impossible not to ponder the question "What would have happened if? The Arab extermination plan would have been successful"? On the other hand, it is also impossible not to make a comparison between the celebrations of the "Palestinian Nakba" and the celebrations of the neo-Nazi organizations in Europe mourning the defeat of Germany in 1945.
The distance between the defeat of Germany in 1945 and the defeat of the Arabs in 1948 is not very great, because alongside the jihad war that the Arabs imposed on the Jewish community in Israel, there was an antisemitic ideological system inspired by Nazi ideology encouraged by Haj Amin al Husseini - who was the Nazi Mufti of Jerusalem until 1937, and who led the "Higher Arab Committee" during the events of the Israeli War of Independence in 1948.
The J..s as mortals worthy of extermination
In the 1940s, the Arab invasion of Palestine intensified. The Jewish Yishuv had to deal with the British policy that closed the country's gates to the cursed refugees of Europe, and on the other hand the Mandatory authorities turned a blind eye to the Arab invasion of Palestine which had economic motives alongside ideological motives. About half a million Arabs invaded the country in a short period of time. At the same time, in 1948, the Jews of Eretz Israel were proud of their contribution to the development of the country in the ears of the American media of those days, with the claim that "in recent years only half a million Arabs from neighboring countries came to Eretz Israel to find employment." This innocence cost us dearly.
The mythical editor of the Egyptian newspaper Al-Ahram, Muhammad Hassaini Heikal, was a young journalist in 1948 who worked for the Egyptian newspaper Ahar Sa'a. It is probable that as early as 1947, a decision was made in the "Arab League" to exterminate the Jews of Israel - if the leaders of the settlement declare the establishment of an independent Jewish state. Immediately after the decision to partition in November 1947, Arab states began sending volunteer fighters to Israel t torpedo as much as possible the practical possibility of dividing the country into two states - Jewish and Arab. No one was talking about a "Palestinian state," only an "Arab state." Muhammad Hassaini Heichel was sent by the newspaper to cover the war in Israel, and in this context he accompanied an Egyptian volunteer force whose job was to ambush an Israeli supply convoy sent to help the besieged Kibbutz Nitzanim. In the battle that ensued, the convoy managed to stop the Egyptian force, and after many hours of fighting against the Egyptian onslaught, The Egyptian force was halted while inflicting heavy casualties on the dead and wounded - who were scattered in the field for their dozens. The battle greatly shocked Muhammad Hussein Heikal, and at the end of March 1948 he published the following in the newspaper Achr Sa'a:
"When I went out to the Holy Land, I thought, like many of my Arab brothers, that I would find wretched and fearful Jews there who would flee as long as their souls in them when we began to kill them. I realized I was wrong. The Jews I saw on the battlefield fought to the last drop. "Use sophisticated tactics and refuse to surrender. Any Arab army that invades Palestine would be better off taking into account what I wrote above. The battle for the Holy Land will not be easy."
These words were written even before the beginning of the organized military invasion of Arab states, which began on May 15, 1948, with the participation of Iraq, which has no common border with Israel. Gush Etzion was attacked and fell by the Arab Legion of the Kingdom of Jordan a day before the declaration of Israeli independence. In order to understand the Arab ideology advocating the extermination and extermination of Jewish existence in Israel, the following example will shed some light on the true picture: Immediately after the Arab defeat following the Six Day War, in June 1967, the official State of Israel raised a natural demand for "recognized safe borders" "In light of past lessons. Muhammad Hasnain Heikal in 1969 reflected the official position of the world-Arab newspaper "Al-Ahram" as follows: "the borders safe and sellers of Israel, in our opinion, are the synagogue of Tel Aviv and only 10 meters around."
There is a direct link between the defeat of 1948 and the defeat of 1967. In both cases, the Arabs will begin to go to war against Israel as part of the Arab extermination plan. In a mask of international conspiracy, once again, it is impossible to avoid comparing the feelings of neo-Nazi activists who see themselves as "innocent victims" of powerful and wealthy international forces.
Has Arab nationalism learned its lesson?
The Arab defeat of 1948 led to the establishment of a new Arab colonial power in the form of the imaginary "Palestinian nationalism." In 1964, the "Palestinian Convention" was even compiled for this purpose in order to create an ideological formula of extermination and annihilation according to an organized and understandable plan for each and every one of the Arab public. In 1988, the "Hamas Convention" was published, which drew its inspiration from the Qur'an and the "Palestinian Convention." Thus, the J..s who are the "sons of the pigs, monkeys," (according to the Qur'an), received political-religious significance of creatures worthy of extermination also as a religious commandment. Neither the supporters of Arab nationalism nor Jews with antisemitic tendencies do not test the historical absurdity that there are two "Palestinian movements" that have existed for at most a few decades, seeking to destroy and annihilate a national community with a written history of 5,000 years.
We are currently in the process of establishing a "third Palestinian movement encouraged by Arab nationalists with Israeli citizenship who formulate the "final solution" to the problem of "Jews in Israel." The Arab leadership of the Israeli Arabs seeks to wreak further disaster on itself and the public it ostensibly aspires to represent. Those with a radical Arab nationalist approach with fascist leanings have not yet learned the bitter and hasty lesson of the 1948 Arab extermination program.
It is better to be a second-class citizen in Israel
An Arab journalist named Khaled Abu-Toameh, who serves as a correspondent for Palestinian affairs at the Jerusalem Post, caused a great stir during May 2010 in preparation for the celebrations to mark the "Palestinian Nakba." Abu-Toameh, who lives in Jerusalem, does an excellent job as a journalist - which no Israeli journalist is capable of doing: that is, he covers the activities of the "Palestinian Authority" without fuss and without the evasive stuff that is so typical of Haaretz. Undoubtedly, Abu Toameh is an Arab patriot, but he comes with a refreshing approach that is firmly rooted in the reality of the Arab world and of the ideological ground that drives the Arab-Israeli conflict. In light of his journalistic work, he is frequently invited to lecture to various audiences overseas, as well as to thirsty Arab audiences to receive refreshing information on the political and social processes taking place in the "Palestinian Authority" and the Gaza Strip. Occasionally, Abu Tauma has met with senior statesmen around the world - not just for his journalistic work, But also to voice his reservations about the political processes taking place in the region. In his opinion, the resolution of the conflict between the "Palestinian Authority" and the State of Israel is a "gradual process" and not an "event", and that it is necessary to know how to "manage the conflict" without getting into political mines that push the parties into another round of violence.
So far so good. What infuriated Palestinians and Arabs living abroad, however, was that Abu Tauma did not hesitate to touch the exposed nerves of Arab political culture - especially the Palestinian one as expressed in practice both in the "Palestinian Authority" of Judea and Samaria and in the Gaza Strip. Under the leadership of the Hamas movement, it was on the day of the "Palestinian Nakba" that he bothered to make these arguments, which caused a surge of strong emotions among his listeners abroad:
In light of what is happening in the Arab world and in the "Palestinian Authority" politically and socially, he would rather be a second-class citizen in Israel than be a first-class citizen in an Arab state.
The Arab and Palestinian community abroad live in a "parallel universe" of political leftism and ideological radicalism that is completely detached from everyday reality.
The foreign journalists covering the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and the Arab-Israeli conflict write out of deep ignorance. In his opinion, they do not speak Arabic or Hebrew; They do not know the history of the area; And they are usually biased towards the Arab side. Foreign journalists are not interested in reporting on the existing corruption in the Palestinian Authority and the mutual violence that prevails in Palestinian society, because this does not match the narrative of the "good Palestinians" versus the "bad Israelis." For example, since 2007, some 2,000 Palestinians have been killed in armed clashes between Hamas operatives and Fatah activists. However, few foreign journalists have bothered to mention this or cover these violent incidents.
It is ironic in his eyes that in order to engage in a real press from a pro-Palestinian point of view in order to promote reform and democracy in Palestinian society, this is possible only within the Israeli media and not within the Palestinian media.
Khaled Abu-Toameh's approach is accepted (with silence) precisely among the Arab public living in Judea and Samaria, since they are intimately acquainted with the political and social life that prevails under the ruling framework of the Fatah movement and the Hamas movement - regardless of allegations concerning the "occupation" The Israeli as part of a mental system of evasion and denial typical of Arab politics. Khaled Abu-Toumeh offers an approach different from that generally accepted in Arab rhetoric. However, if radical radicals such as Ahmad Tibi , Jamal Zahalka , Raed Salah and others in Israel and others are strengthened. For, it is likely that Arab nationalism will have to deal if another Arab defeat is more severe than its predecessor. For, the cries of their ancestors since 1947 still resonate in our ears: "The men to the sea - and the women for us."
https://anochi.com/sp-191934294/
Ahmad Shukeiri was born in Lebanon to a Turkish mother, was a lawyer in Jordan , served as Syria's ambassador to the UN, as Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the UN, the Arab League’s ambassador to the UN…Indeed a multi-national man . On the one hand, as early as 1956, he proclaimed over the UN podium, as the Arab League’s ambassador there, "Such a creature as Palestine does not exist at all", but after several years the fraud is created. In 1964, after this talented actor was hired by the Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser to establish the PLO, an organization dedicated to the "liberation" of a people and a country that – in his own words, which are now being swept under the carpet – do not even exist. The founder of the "Palestinian People" is Turkish – Lebanese – Saudi – Jordanian – Egyptian – a ready hireling for every chicanery in the service of the Arab leaders. Indeed, this is the man most suitable for the pretentious deception of inventing a new People, out of nothing … … Where did this bluff come from? Until the Six-Day War, the Arabs didn’t even try to camouflage their intention with phrases like "the final solution", and the slogans that frequently were announced over the radio waves in all Arab countries were plainspoken and primitive: "Throw the Jews into the sea", "The men to the sea and the women for us", and the world knew and kept silent, but nevertheless had difficulty digesting a style so blatant and murderous…
http://www.shoebat.com/documents/pstineNationalism.pps
https://www.slideshare.net/mobile/cjhs/tsafrir-ronen-how-we-swallowed-the-bluff
Between a culture of shame and a culture of guilt. Sadat
Moshe Sharon | 12/05/2017
The article is published in the new issue of the "Nation" quarter, number 205, which is mostly dedicated to marking the 50th anniversary of the Six Day War
Of all the many contributions of the Six Day War to the State of Israel and to the Jewish people in general, I would like to highlight two. One is the clear, absolute victory, the power of which cannot be doubted. Not a "points" victory but a knockout that knocked the Arab armies to the boards.
The second contribution is Jerusalem, which the war brought to the Jewish people: a whole and perfect Jerusalem, and the saints of Israel for generations in her heart. Jerusalem of the past and present, that of David and Solomon and the kings of Judah, and that of the Second Temple from Ezra to Herod.
These two contributions, which unfortunately have not been fully utilized by the people of Israel, have left a mark on generations and have established a special character and a new dimension to the struggle that we do not see ending between us and the seekers of our souls. For at the outbreak of the Six Day War they were sure that our erasure from the face of the earth was a matter of a few days. Their victory was unquestionable, and all the Arab media inflamed the spirits of the masses in the style of Ahmed Said, the chief broadcaster of 'Sawt al-Arab' (Voice of the Arabs) Radio: "We will throw the men into the sea, and we will take the women." And the masses understood well what was said.
The imagination sailed into the realms of the ancient history of the Arabs and of Islam. The time has come for the Muslim sword to slaughter the Jewish men as it did in the past, in the heyday of the conquests, and thousands of Jewish women to become booty of war. The foolish attempt of establishing a Jewish state on Muslim land would come to an end with fire and blood, delighting the scorching disgrace of 1948.
As the armies brushed swords, the crowd cheered and rejoiced and the imagination skyrocketed in the media, Arab leaders who went to war knew how to describe its goals in wavy bristles. The world, it turned out, remained indifferent to the possibility of a second Holocaust. The ruler of Iraq in those days, 'Abd a-Rahman Araf, described the goals of the war: This is our opportunity to erase the disgrace that has been within us since 1948. Our goal is clear - to erase Israel from the map. We will meet with the help of Allah in Tel Aviv and Haifa. "
The initiator of the war and the one who formulated the idea of a united Arab army was Jamal 'Abd a-Nasser, the governor of Egypt who was recognized as the first and foremost of all Arabs. The elimination of Israel was for him a supreme goal, which became the goal of all Arabs. He has presented this doctrine at every opportunity since the coup that brought him to power in 1952. Thus, for example, he said in a public speech in 1965: “Our ambition is the destruction of Israel. We have set ourselves two goals: an immediate goal is to complete the formation of the Arab force, and a national goal is the elimination of Israel. "
The entire Arab world, whether voluntarily or out of sheer enthusiasm of the masses, was swept away by these promising statements, and the war became a total war of all Arabs. At the forefront were the countries that took over the Egyptian supreme leadership: Syria and Jordan. They were joined by Iraq, Saudi Arabia and North African countries, both in the allocation of troops and in the allocation of resources. Faced with such tremendous military power, it was clear as day that the great slaughter would begin when only the signal was given. Radio Cairo and Damascus Radio in Hebrew broadcast instructions to Jews on how they should behave when the victorious Arab fighters appeared. In 1948, Azzam Pasha, the secretary of the Egyptian Arab League, promised a slaughter similar to that of the Mongols. In 1967 it seemed to the Arabs a real promise.
To succeed where Saladin failed
From now on, things are familiar: 'Abd a-Nasser set fire, and his army flowed into Sinai. U Thant, the UN secretary general in those days, was quick to evacuate the force that had been stationed in Sinai since 1957 for the purpose of maintaining peace, since what did this "peacekeeper" have to do with the new Arab knight. His eyes closed, just as the eyes of the United States closed in the face of the closure of the sea crossings in Tiran Egypt. The lack of response to these acts encouraged Nasser. The victory, almost with international support, seems certain from day to day. In front of his eyes was the figure of Saladin Ibn Ibn Ayub, who knew how to unite Egypt and Syria (including across the Jordan), and thus wrapped a choke ring around the Crusader kingdom of Jerusalem and rescued Jerusalem and the mountain ridge.
Unfortunately for him, unlike the medieval Kurdish knight, Nasser did not get the union between Egypt and Syria to last long. The United Arab Community (KM), which he founded in 1958, collapsed in 1961. But here now is another chance to march to victory, and with the Syrian and Jordanian armies under Egyptian supreme command, as well as military units and tanks from Iraq with Saudi addition. It will be a victory several times greater than that of Saladin, who with all his efforts failed to eliminate the Crusaders. Nasser considered himself a modern Saladin and promised with absolute certainty to succeed where his legendary hero had failed, and to defeat the new Crusaders who had taken over the Holy Land and inflicted disgrace on the Arabs.
The mountain of sure victory spawned a mouse on the first weekend of June 1967. The palace, the fruit of the fertile imagination of the Arabs whose media was passionate, was revealed as a building of cards. At the same time, two basic weaknesses of Arab culture were discovered when it came to dealing with a reality that did not fit the imagination. These weaknesses stem from the fact that Arab society belongs to a shame-oriented culture, unlike Western society which is a guilt-oriented culture.
American anthropologist Ruth Benedict (Patterns of Culture, 1934) and other anthropologists have distinguished between cultures of shame and cultures of guilt. Shame is a social phenomenon experienced when some negative act is exposed to the eyes of others. Guilt, on the other hand, does not depend on what others would say if they knew about an act. It is on the plane between man and himself, and unlike shame it is impossible to escape from it or hide from it. The shame is close to the person who felt it, the one whose shame was shown to the public. The blame is actually close.
In shame cultures sinners tend to go into exile, where no one knows about their past, or commit suicide (as in Japanese culture, for example). Guilt, on the other hand, creates a clear distinction between the act of sin and the person who committed it. The act was bad, but the doer remained, in principle, whole. Therefore guilt can be removed and atoned for with the help of confession, remorse or punishment. It is in our power to remove guilt from us, by punishing us or forgiving us. Shame, on the other hand, is not erased in forgiveness and there is no system of punishment that can undo it. There is no atonement for a tarnished name, for a damaged class, for a dishonored honor and for a damaged reputation. Throughout the days, the stigma and disgrace will be felt.
In shame-oriented Arab culture, the supreme value of social life is respect. Damage to dignity means that the public to which the individual belongs is aware of the fact that his or her dignity or the dignity of his or her group has been harmed, even if the harm is imagined. One of the most prominent manifestations of such harm is "desecration of the family." A crime that results in imprisonment, for example, is not necessarily an act of harming the dignity of the family. On the contrary, it can even be considered in many cases something heroic and brings honor: "The prison is for men (Al-Habas for Larjal)" - says the popular proverb. On the other hand, a woman who appears in the company of a foreign man and even happens to have such a meeting at random, it is clearly a disgrace to the family, since her disgrace was revealed to the public. The honor of the family is almost entirely concentrated in the woman, and from the moment this honor is trampled and turned into disgrace, there is no way to protest it except by its removal from the world of the one who caused it, that is, in the murder of the woman. The role of execution rests with one of the family members closest to the creator of the stigma - that is, the father of the woman or her brother, And the murder should be done in the most overt and brutal way possible. Blood must be shed, and the more it does, the better. This is the revenge of those who experienced the shame and were exposed to disgrace. In other words, shame can only be erased by public revenge, one that shame-oriented society will recognize as the blasphemer.
The lie fabricated in a phone call
And back to the Six Day War. As great as the boasting before and during the war, and as great as the lie and deception that accompanied its early days, so was the magnitude of the disgrace that befell Arab society. Not only were Arab armies beaten victorious, but it was inflicted on them by the Jews who are despised in their eyes from all over the world. Moreover, shamefully, the Jews did so in a few days. Although the war lasted until the ceasefire for about six days, in fact the honor of the Arabs was trampled to the end in one day. The disgrace was not sweetened by refraining from using the words "six days" to describe the war (instead it is called the "June war"). Words cannot remove the stigma that had two sides: one is the bone of discrimination and its depth, and the other the cause of discrimination, the Jews. If you are already ashamed, then it is worthwhile and proper that the contempt itself should not be despised.
Therefore, Arab leaders, led by the Egyptian president, who was the father of war and discrimination, first sought to find another factor to replace the Jews as the cause of the Arab failure. Towards the end of the battles, Nasser phoned King Hussein and told him a story in which the British and United States air forces joined forces to eliminate the Arab air forces. This lie, stitched up in rough stitches, was captured even after Israeli intelligence released the recording of the conversation between the two losers. Only a few sought the sheer truth, which means dealing hour by hour with the disgrace. Nasser and Hussein offered some cloak of disgrace. It does not discriminate against the Jews as it discriminates against two superpowers, and perhaps things can even be presented upside down: here is how we, the few Arabs, managed to stand for a week in front of the most sophisticated war machines in the world. Although we did not win, the disgrace is digestible.
As on the personal and family level, so on the national level: in a shame-oriented culture, the way to save a trampled honor is only through revenge on the stigma. The disgrace that Israel inflicted on the Arabs, and few people did not ultimately recognize this fact, can be removed only by revenge. In a guilt-oriented culture, even the most terrible wars of the twentieth century ended in agreements aimed at forgiving and starting a new era, since forgiveness is one way to overcome guilt. However, in a shame-oriented culture, such an approach is not possible. On the contrary, the only way to escape the stigma is to preserve hostility and prepare for revenge.
This was reflected in the Khartoum Conference convened on August 29, 1967, with the participation of eight heads of state, including Egyptian 'Abd a-Nasser, King of Saudi Arabia, King of Jordan, President of Iraq, President of Lebanon and others (Syria boycotted the conference). The conference passed a resolution centered on three aspirations: no peace with Israel, no recognition of it and no negotiations with it. Khartoum's laity were born out of the need for revenge. Therefore, the war must continue and the entire Arab world must shoot at it in order to "wipe out the disgrace" (Maho Elar - a phrase that has been repeated many times by Arab leaders since 1948, and even more so since 1967).
And to emphasize the resumption of the war, Nasser began the war of attrition. The propaganda mouthpieces of the Arabs glorified the war of attrition as a direct continuation of the Six Day War, as they say ‘we are not done yet. The goal is to destroy our Jewish enemies, and we do so after regaining our strength. ' But even the war of attrition did not mimic the disgrace, for the Jews were stuck on the bank of the canal, controlling the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem and deepening their hold on the Golan Heights. The need for revenge was inherited from Nasser to Anwar Sadat, who was a unique personality. It had a fusion of two cultures; He was shame-oriented, but at the same time guilt-oriented. On the one hand the need for revenge burned in him, but he also knew and recognized the limitations of his power.
Peace with Israel - "Violation of Family Dignity"
On December 25, 1977, the first meeting of peace talks with Egypt took place. Four years have passed since Sadat's attempt to take revenge. The Yom Kippur War did end in an Israeli victory, a victory that was not overwhelming, even if our soldiers were 99 km from Cairo (not 101). The victory, which could have been crushing, was averted by Israel by the United States, which saved the entire Egyptian Third Army from extermination or capture by Israel. An overwhelming victory, no less, is what was required then and is still required today in every encounter between Israel and its enemies...
https://mida.org.il/2017/05/12/%D7%95%D7%90%D7%96-%D7%A1%D7%90%D7%93%D7%90%D7%AA-%D7%94%D7%A1%D7%91%D7%99%D7%A8-%D7%9C%D7%99-%D7%90%D7%99%D7%9A-%D7%94%D7%AA%D7%A2%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%94-%D7%94%D7%A2%D7%A8%D7%91%D7%99%D7%AA-%D7%94/
When the Israelis invaded the West Bank and took over Ramallah in 2002 (Operation Defensive Shield), they took over all the t.v. stations. There was a 24 hour curfew. The Israelis began broadcasting pornography on 2 of the 3 t.v. stations, to subvert the Arab culture which is chaste about male-female relations to a fault, to the extent that it tends to go towards admitting improper attention to boys. This was a bizarre article.
What is an EXTATIC?
ec·stat·ic
/ekˈstadik,ikˈstadik/
Learn to pronounce
adjective
1.
feeling or expressing overwhelming happiness or joyful excitement.
“ecstatic fans filled the stadium”
Interesting tool...
Learn to spell.....
It’s 100 virgins. 72 female for servants, and 28 boys for pleasure.
They have an actual ‘math’ for this XXX rared twisted “paradise”...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.