[gas_dr]

Opinion masquerading as fact. As the blog says don’t hide behind science. That says it all. This is someone pumping out long outdated talking points with just a hint of fear porn all wrapped up in a neat little don’t argue with me statement.

Pathetic. But the usual coterie of antivaxxers will fall for it.

[\/\/ayne]

Here's the actual quote:I am more than happy to correspond with you if... You make your points using sound logic and don't hide behind links or the word "science."

Here's what you said: ... the blog says don’t hide behind science.

Do you not think people can't read both those statements?

[Alberta's Child]

I'm not an "anti-vaxxer," but I'm not letting any of these COVID vaccines near me. I don't need eighteen reasons, either ... five will do:

1. COVID-19 is not overly lethal for most people. Even those with aggravating conditions have a high survival rate. I see no reason to take an experimental vaccine to protect me against a disease that isn’t much more harmful than the seasonal flu.

2. I have no confidence in the safety of these experimental vaccines.

3. I have no confidence in the effectiveness of these experimental vaccines. If I have to get another vaccine in six months, than what’s the point? Will I be taking this sh!t for the rest of my life?

4. Pharmaceutical firms are given legal immunity from lawsuits related to harmful side effects and product defects in these vaccines. That itself ought to be a giant red flag for anyone who is even considering a vaccine for a viral pathogen that has such a low fatality rate.

5. Every time some government bureaucrat jackass like Anthony Fauci shows up on TV wearing one or more face diapers and tells us we need to continue to take restrictive measures to protect ourselves even AFTER getting a vaccine, I have no reason to believe that these vaccines have any purpose whatsoever related to protecting individuals or collective populations against COVID.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Lately, your posting style is:

100% criticism
0% evidence or facts to back it up

Your choice.

[Third Wheel]

So says the fake doctor.

[metmom]

Really?

What are the long term effects of these vaccines that you guys know of?

Can you guarantee there will be none?

Did the vaccine manufacturers never get sued for bad vaccines?

Are they not guaranteed immunity from lawsuits for harm done to those receiving the vaccines?

What has he said that is not true?

Please post them and refute them point by point instead of making generalized statements of his character.

[frogjerk]

I see you have no substantive rebuttal to the points put forth by the article but just ad hominem attacks.

[bagster]

Pathetic. But the usual coterie of antivaxxers will fall for it.

That would be moi. I am of the coterie.

Pro-tip, Gassie. There are 'anti-vaxxers' and there are 'anti-covid vaxxers'. Two different animals.

'Anti-vaxxer' was the slur used before covid vax came along. Most people weren't full on with that, but many were. They may or may not have had justification. Likely not.

Anti-covid vaxxers have MANY valid reasons for being so. But the vaxxer crowd tars people that are against a SPECIFIC vax with the old timey slur, thinking it will shame them.

It won't.

My reasons for not vaxxing it up?

I will not inject a potion into my blood that comes from the very people who gave us the bio-weapon. I will not become part of the collective because of peer pressure and shaming. Wool makes me itch, so I will not be a sheep.

I will remain a free American and I would not like to be a mutant (unless I get super powers).

That would be insane in the membrane.

[Captain Peter Blood]

How much are you being paid to push the vaccine? Is your faith in this so absolute you have no common sense or logic.

[grey_whiskers]

What? Are you against science?