So its a bunch of inconsiderate slobs with symptoms that are spreading it?
Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the World Health Organization’s emerging diseases unit could not point to a single case of asymptomatic transmission..
There was not one documented case. Forget rare..
Without the asymptomatic spread BS, the lockdown/mask/distancing scamdemic narrative collapses. Fauci/Birx/Redfield (and others) should swing for this
We shut down the world based on a lie? Who told President Trump that folks can spread it and have no symptoms? Which FReepers touted that over and over and over again???
There are NO Documented cases pf asymptomatic spread, those without symptoms don’t have enough oif the virus to transmit it.
Everyone needs to pay close attention to the words they use:
The data suggests that asymptomatic people may spread the virus.
this is functionally equivalent to:
The data suggests that if Elephants flap their ears fast enough they May be able to FLY!!
“Data substantiating wide asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 remains elusive”
So they’re having trouble seeing what ain’t there?
That’s very odd...
The CCP virus has never been isolated.
There is no science there.
Great article on the lockdown lies of many of our power hungry and/or risk averse leaders.
Fears that COVID-19 can spread very easily through asymptomatic transmission (as high as 45% of all casses) were a major factor behind the prolonged lockdowns and mitigation measures seen across the world over the past year. Health leaders claimed that the threat of symptom-free spread necessitated broad shutdowns of major portions of the economy, indefinite school closures, mandatory public mask-wearing, capacity limits and other social distancing measures, and various other tactics for containing the spread of COVID-19 (https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/data-continue-remain-elusive-prevalence-asymptomatic-spread-covid-19 April 9. 2021). Scientists and public health officials have struggled to come up with any meaningful epidemiological evidence to that effect and those that argue this point have encountered significant backlash.
• A meta-analysis of 54 studies with 77 758 participants found that, within households, asymptomatic carriers of the virus passed it on to housemates at the rate of about 0.7% (JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):e2031756).
• A study found “a prediction interval of 0%-10% for asymptomatic [attack rates]” (The role of asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic infection in SARS-CoV-2 transmission—a living systematic review. Clin Micro and Inf. 2021;27:511-519).
• An “analytical model” study that “assessed the relative amount of transmission from presymptomatic, never symptomatic, and symptomatic individuals across a range of scenarios” concludes that “persons with infection who never develop symptoms may account for approximately 24% of all transmission” (JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(1):e2035057).
• A study presented in a research letter found that people with close contacts with symptomatic COVID-19 were 3.85 times more likely to contract COVID-19 than those exposed to individuals with asymptomatic disease (Lancet 2020 Dec 18;EPub Ahead of Print). 628 people with COVID-19 and 3790 people who were close contacts of an index case were quarantined in Singapore. Overall 2% of 3790 close community contacts developed COVID-19 while in quarantine. The main limitation of this analysis is that cycle threshold values and viable shedding data were not available for all individuals included. Future studies should explore the relationship between viral loads, viable shedding, and transmission. These findings suggest that where resources permit, contact tracing should proactively seek people with asymptomatic COVID-19 because they can transmit disease and will need to be contained if a national policy objective is to minimise cases and transmission. However, if resources are limited, then focusing contact tracing around symptomatic people who are easy to identify (by way of them seeking health care) might be more resource-effective in reducing transmission at the population level. A close contact generally refers to a person who was within 2 m of the index case for at least 30 min (or for shorter durations in high-risk settings).
• A meta-analysis of 2,454 articles estimates that the relative risk [RR] of asymptomatic transmission was 42% lower than that for symptomatic transmission (combined RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.99, p = 0.047) (JAMMI. 2020;Published Online: December 11).
“elusive” = Fauci and CDC LYING to keep fear driven control alive.
THE LINK IS SELF-EXPLANATORY!
QUESTION 1: IS IT TRUE? WE’LL KNOW IN 2022 or 23!
QUESTION 2: WILL YOU BE HERE??
https://theredelephants.com/ex-pfizer-vice-president-covid-19-vaccines-to-cause-mass-depopulation-event-within-2-years/
Of this giant scam which really is just a giant communist plot
The “asymptomatic transmission” part of that has always been the biggest most laughable and most complete and utter bull crap part of it
You have no symptoms whatsoever and yet are going to be able to shed this virus
Complete utter garbage
We spend so much time bickering about COVID BS while we are losing a free society.