If they are so “rare,’ why the article then giving a ‘heads up’?
>.>
<.<
They are ‘rare’ from the vaccine, but not ‘rare’ from other causes.
I had a DVT, Deep Vein Thrombosis, in my left leg last year and went to the doctor because my leg was swollen and I had a hard time breathing. They immediately put me in the hospital on blood thinners. A month later I had a quad by-pass ..................
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Blood+clots++side+effect+of+AstraZeneca%27s+COVID-19+vaccine
Did a search for “Blood clots side effect of AstraZeneca vaccine”, removing the “very rare” phrase.
Pretty much every result has “very rare” in it.
Results from USA, the EU. The whole world is following a script.
So rare, 18 countries suspended AZ vaccine usage. https://www.businessinsider.com/astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-countries-suspend-denmark-thailand-batch-blood-clots-2021-3?op=1
answered your own question
“If they are so “rare,’ why the article then giving a ‘heads up’?”
I looked the word “rare” up in the dictionary. It said...
>rare...see Jen Psaki’s definition of “very uncommon”.