Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Column: Legislature tries to eliminate single-family-home zoning, again [California]
San Diego Union-Tribune ^ | 31 Mar 2021 | Michael Smolens

Posted on 03/31/2021 10:50:05 PM PDT by blueplum

The battle over housing is back at the state Capitol....

...For some time, a main focus of housing legislation has been to bulk up density along major transit corridors. That concept appears to have broad support. But the real fight is over key provisions that allow for two, three or four units — and sometimes more — to be built on lots zoned for single-family homes...

...Eliminating single-family zoning has become a bedrock goal for many housing advocates. It is also one vociferously opposed by suburban homeowner groups ...Such developments would have to be within a half-mile of transit lines, job centers or near existing urbanized areas. That covers a lot of territory, especially when it applies to existing and planned transit.

Such bills would not prohibit single-family homes from existing or being built, but would ban zoning that limits one home per lot...

(Excerpt) Read more at sandiegouniontribune.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Society
KEYWORDS: agenda21; nannystate; privateproperty; suburbs
The crazies in the state legislature are trying to do it again - eliminate single family zoning. Curiously, these same crazies also say that those disadvantaged who live next to major corridors in high density housing that the state wants to create more of, are the most impacted by pollution and crime.

Don't let your state do this to you!

1 posted on 03/31/2021 10:50:05 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Agenda 21.


2 posted on 03/31/2021 11:26:41 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Connecticut is trying to do something similar as well


3 posted on 04/01/2021 12:50:54 AM PDT by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

I couldn’t care less. The crazies that vote these crazies in deserve what they get. Then they get reelected.


4 posted on 04/01/2021 2:41:12 AM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

This may be California, but it’s my understanding that the Biden Administration has settled on the policy of making it prohibitively expensive to remain in single family homes, due to their lack of ‘sustainability’. So, sure, some people will still have the means to stay in their houses, but most will read the writing on the wall, and start moving into the high-rise apartments to be built along ‘transportation corridors’, and thereby drastically lowering their environmental footprint. At which point, much of the housing stock can be torn down and replaced by open land or wilderness areas.

The early clues for this will be energy prices and property taxes going way up, but other means, including building codes, lack of police protection, personal vehicle mandates for ‘sustainability’, etc. are also in the mix.


5 posted on 04/01/2021 3:19:17 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

They already do everything possible to discourage building, just go down and try to get a building permit to build a home on your property. It will cost you at least $100K just to get through the Paperwork, plus any expenses necessary to satisfy their lust for power and control over their fellow man.


6 posted on 04/01/2021 6:02:44 AM PDT by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson