100% of the 48 studies to date report positive effects (23 statistically significant in isolation). Random effects meta-analysis for early treatment and pooled effects shows an 79% reduction, RR 0.21 [0.10-0.44], and prophylactic use shows 89% improvement, RR 0.11 [0.06-0.23]. Mortality results show 76% lower mortality, RR 0.24 [0.14-0.42] for all treatment delays, and 84% lower, RR 0.16 [0.04-0.63] for early treatment.
•100% of the 25 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) report positive effects, with an estimated 68% improvement, RR 0.32 [0.21-0.49].
•The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 48 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 281 trillion (p = 0.000000000000004).
https://ivmmeta.com/
Gary Null recommended this.
These studies are all very hopeful, but I am having difficulty determining the ongoing prophylaxis dosage and frequency. Is it 200 micrograms per kilogram daily, weekly, or monthly? The warnings about Ivermectin say that it works as an anti-viral but only at extremely high dosages. However, high dosages apparently cause organ damage. Is there an emerging consensus about what the ongoing preventative dose and frequency should be?
Many people have to die, over years of double blind studies and then...