And yet you have been pursuing it for 108 posts.
Will the lies never end?
Posted on 03/16/2021 11:38:22 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
Q: Into The Storm is airing on HBO Max on March 21
It names Ronald Watkins, the son of 8Chan owner Jim Watkins, as Q
The filmmakers say they spent three years studying the right-wing conspiracy theory
Ron is the administrator of 8Chan, now known as 8Kun, where QAnon erupted
The founder of 8Chan - Frederick Brennan - has previously named Ron or his father as Q
They are the only two who have verified Q's posts on 8Chan
SNIP
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
*Yawns*.
And yet you have been pursuing it for 108 posts.
Will the lies never end?
While attacking the source is a common logical fallacy, it is hilarious coming from those whose source is anonymous posts on 4chan/8chan/8kun.
I conceded your point that the two photos are the same. Stop propping up your strawman. Q posted that particular photo with an insert of the Apple reflection to show the position that Q had to have been in to have taken a photo of the Apple reflection (separate and previous photo).
How do you not get that? Seems that such an expert on all things Q would understand context and timelines. Q was an ongoing conversation, with proofs stacked upon proofs, one proof proving another.
You taking one photo which was used as an illustration to prove another is disingenuous and just another of your compounded lies. Explain the other photos Q posted of inside Air Force One. After that, explain the countless other original photos taken in China, the streets of Hong Kong, North Korea, London and more.
Was that Codemonkey the world renowned international man of mystery and spy?
Your struggling is very one dimensional and child-like. But you do amuse me.
So, no. All the Q proofs were not disproven. Quite the contrary. All attempts to disprove them fell short and were weak attempts by the derps (and shelps) to debunk Q. Q has never been debunked.
And if Q has never been debunked how is my world a 'fantasy world'?
You just keep making things up based on your false foundations.
We also call that lying.
...except for a few half-wits such as yourself.
Now, be nice Booger.
Also, my brain challenges your brain to an arm wrestling contest. Winner take all.
You are a fabulous fountain of fanciful fallacies.
Just to put a cherry on top of your 'big lie'.
The 'manipulation' you speak of was Q inserting the Apple reflection into the photo to show the previous photo (of the Apple photo) in context, thereby proving that the Apple reflection photo was taken in Air Force One, by Q. And that he was working with Trump.
How else would Q be in there taking photos? Or maybe Codemonkey snuck n board? Is that your next theory?
This is easy stuff, bro. Ponder it well and maybe it'll sink in.
Your big 'proof' is nothing but the blathering of the uninformed.
The peanut gallery chimes in.
>
I downloaded the Q photo, rotated and flipped it, and lightened it to more or less match the ABC photo.
One thing stands out. There is something in the ashtray that is in front of the lamp which looks like it could be a cigar. That is clearly not present in the ABC photo. Why would a fraudster think to add in a cigar given it’s well known that Trump isn’t a smoker?
The relative positions of the lampshade with respect to the vertical lines of the curtain that are behind it are slightly different in the two photos. It’s close, but there are differences.
Another clear difference is the amount of the curtain you see to the left of the jacket on the chair. In the ABC photo, the last dark line that is fully visible is very close and almost touches the jacket and the pleats are evenly spaced. In the Q photo, that same dark line is farther away and the pleats in that area are pushed together, they aren’t exactly vertical.
They are definitely two different pictures.
Even better.
The fact remains that Q posted that particular pic and inserted the Apple reflection (in a box which shows it is an insertion, not a manipulation) to explain the earlier posted Apple reflection pic.
This is what Boogerman doesn't understand, in his strawman effort.
Whether the two pics are the same or not, is not important and not the point.
Good work on analysis.
There is no way the first picture you post was derived from the second by distortion or flipping, which cannot account for the three or four differences between them (depending on how you want to count them) that I noted right away. Anyone experienced with comparing images could spot them immediately. There are probably more than that, but I don’t have time to examine them further, since those first few are so glaringly obvious that I’m rolling my eyes. No, I’m not even talking about the logo reflection, these are apart from that. I’ve done quite a bit of image manipulation in my time. Sorry, your assertion is false, period.
The furniture, items on the table, the jacket on the chair, the placement of every individual blind, and the lighting are all exactly the same.
Bingo! I should have read to the end of the thread before downloading, comparing and finding the very same differences that you did! At least you saved me from having to type it out. Thank you! LOL
I read all of Ron’s posts on twitter until they banned him. Then I read his posts on Gab. Even saw him on OAN. Here is the cold hard fact. Even though Ron is an intelligent guy when it comes to software. There is no way in the world that he ever would have had the resources or the ability to pull off Q. His thought patterns along with some really silly mistakes indicate that he is not at Q level. His thinking and style when he was talking about Vote fraud was not similar at all to Q posts. If he tried it he would been declared a larp in no time.
I see you can’t work up the balls to drop a real F-bomb.
*snicker*
CodeMonkey.....
and I’ll say this....GOOD JOB....you got people to really get involved in what the real story is ...the deep state, etc....
What are you afraid of?
Qult? Q must be the only “Qult” that tells the people to think for themselves and question everything, research the info. The proof is in the pudding. Everything researched is actually already in the public domain. Imagine that.
Again, what are you afraid of? You do realize that info researched in late ‘17 and ‘18 is exactly what Fox stations are revealing now? Tucker, Hannity, Dobbs, Ingraham, Judge Jeanine etc. have been dropping the info for over a year now.
Again, what are you afraid of?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.