Global carbon emissions rebound to pre-COVID levels https://www.axios.com/carbon-emissions-pre-pandemic-335ee46d-08ca-477e-a220-33d354ea50c3.html
“Some men just want to watch the world burn.”
Maybe it’s been debunked, but I’ll bet it will happen.
Or we could try floating climate scientists out to the Caribbean on Icebergs and see if we get the same results. I like my plan better.
Global carbon emissions rebound to pre-COVID levels https://www.axios.com/carbon-emissions-pre-pandemic-335ee46d-08ca-477e-a220-33d354ea50c3.html
If the half of the peeps on the Globe who believe in CAGW just off themselves, we’ll easily meet the targets.
No. Not even Paris ‘herself’ wants to keep on this way.
But for how long each time? Given that someone like Klaus Schwab directed that statement, their plan is each lockdown cycle would also last 2 years.
The real truth for the lockdowns...
They couldn’t keep the truth secret ,LOL
No, I don’t think I’ll be playing along with that BS.
Time to 86 the scientists.
Insanity has become a fashionable status quo.
The level of CO2 emission from human activity probably did drop as they say. But the CO2 level in the atmosphere as measured at Mauna Loa did not even blink. No measurable difference due to reduction in human activity. The gradual consistent increases in atmospheric CO2 is due to other causes. We have nothing to do with it.
A lockdown is needed once every two years?
...Is this the two-week flatten-the-curve type of lockdown?
or
...Is this the year-long lockdown these two weeks turned in to?
Ping
These comments don't quite match the headline.
this is still nonsense anyway.
As I predicted. Now that masses are conditioned to endure and defend long term extensive restrictions on freedom of movement and association, and to be increasingly dependent upon the government, then in the name of another dire emergency, certain powers will seek to impose the like for even longer, with affirmation of such powers being required and any form of dissent punished. As the devil likes it.