To: Capt. Tom
That seems to be a rather low effectiveness. Isn't the double shot method in the 80% range effectiveness after the 2nd dosage?
3 posted on
02/27/2021 8:44:23 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
A post here yesterday linked to the explanation that the J&J was tested in South America where there was a more aggressive strain of the virus. The article said the effectiveness of the J&J is being rated higher now. (I forgot exactly what percentage so I won’t put down a number).
To: TomGuy
The moderna and Pfizer are 95% 14 days after the second injection and recent literature shows 92% at preventing disease and transmission.
14 posted on
02/27/2021 9:17:20 AM PST by
gas_dr
(Trial lawyers AND POLITICIANS are Endangering Every Patient in America: INCLUDING THEIR LIBERTIES)
To: TomGuy; gibsonguy; NormsRevenge; Chgogal; Ann Archy; dennisw; entropy12; Captain Walker; ...
it’s about 66% effective
That seems to be a rather low effectiveness. Isn't the double shot method in the 80% range effectiveness after the 2nd dosage? From the excerpted article-The Johnson & Johnson vaccine, which operates on an adenovirus vector platform and does not require ultra-cold storage, was found to be 66% effective in reducing moderate to severe coronavirus and 85% effective against the most serious illness.
16 posted on
02/27/2021 9:19:18 AM PST by
Capt. Tom
(.It's COVID 2021 - The Events, not us, are still in charge -Tom)
To: TomGuy
Isn't the double shot method in the 80% range effectiveness after the 2nd dosage? I think it's claimed to be 70-80% effective after the FIRST dose. 95% after the second.
30 posted on
02/27/2021 9:58:17 AM PST by
pepsi_junkie
(Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson