A number of explanations for the origin of the Apache name have been offered over the years.Hmmmm. Looks like they've been getting woke for a while...From the inception of the Apache project in 1995 the official documentation stated:[15][16]
Apache is a cute name which stuck. It was based on some existing code and a series of software patches, a pun on “A PAtCHy” server.In an April 2000 interview, Brian Behlendorf, one of the creators of Apache said:[17]The name literally came out of the blue. I wish I could say that it was something fantastic, but it was out of the blue. I put it on a page and then a few months later when this project started, I pointed people to this page and said: "Hey, what do you think of that idea?" ... Someone said they liked the name and that it was a really good pun. And I was like, "A pun? What do you mean?" He said, "Well, we're building a server out of a bunch of software patches, right? So it's a patchy Web server." I went, "Oh, all right." ... When I thought of the name, no. It just sort of connotated: "Take no prisoners. Be kind of aggressive and kick some ass."Since 2013 the Apache Foundation has explained the origin of the name as:[18]The name 'Apache' was chosen from respect for the various Native American nations collectively referred to as Apache, well-known for their superior skills in warfare strategy and their inexhaustible endurance. It also makes a cute pun on "a patchy web server"—a server made from a series of patches—but this was not its origin. The group of developers who released this new software soon started to call themselves the "Apache Group".
The source of the Apache name does not matter. Just as the fact that the Washington Redskins were name after the fact that the coach and five of it’s players were native Americans. Doesn’t matter. The road to hell is played with good intentions. Doesnt matter.
You are guilty, guilty, guilty of cultural appropriation and noting else matters. That big tech has foisted this idiotic process on ignorant disciples, Doesn’t matter. You have been judged and every aspect of your life condemned to total eradication. The mob has spoken. It does not care what good you have done. That is irrelevant. You are guilty, guilty, guilty. Guilty. You will be abolished. Your children will be abolished, their children abolished. You expressed a thought that was not popular.
Seriously though, it's obvious the man's Twitter was a project to see how far Freedom of Speech goes nowadays. Apparently it goes up to the point where someone's offended and stops there - must be a hidden Right or Amendment somewhere.
I like the evolution of newsspeak in their timeline. It was because of A. Then nope, it was B. And then C. And frankly C sounds less legit than the actual history of the Washington Redskins football team.
Can a freeware company “get woke and go broke”? I thought they were broke to begin with...