[nevergore]

If he had evidence, he would have presented prior to the election........

[frog in a pot]

If he had evidence, he would have presented prior to the election........

Not necessarily.

It is highly advisable that one use bullet-proof evidence in any attempt to take down what we imagine is the DS.

Lin Wood no doubt has many seemingly reliable and credible sources of evidence; he might be obliged to not use some of that evidence and some may require further verification.

Wood knows that remaining public invites others to step forward with valuable evidence, while at the same time it increases the likelihood of becoming a target

[trebb]

To who? No Courts/”Judges”/”Justices” wanted to hear it.