[frog in a pot]

If he had evidence, he would have presented prior to the election........

Not necessarily.

It is highly advisable that one use bullet-proof evidence in any attempt to take down what we imagine is the DS.

Lin Wood no doubt has many seemingly reliable and credible sources of evidence; he might be obliged to not use some of that evidence and some may require further verification.

Wood knows that remaining public invites others to step forward with valuable evidence, while at the same time it increases the likelihood of becoming a target

[Dr. Franklin]

Lin Wood no doubt has many seemingly reliable and credible sources of evidence; he might be obliged to not use some of that evidence and some may require further verification.

I have thought since the beginning that Wood had sources from Gen. Flynn, Trump's inner circle, or both. People who don't want believe how utterly corrupt our government is, choose to shot the messenger. So, Wood is a lunatic, and people claiming election fraud are just malcontents. The truth needs to come out, and the name calling should stop until it does.

[nevergore]

Interesting hypothesis.....

However, If you really have the information but are unwilling to use it then you shut up until it’s time......Period.....

Anything other than that is the mark of a snake-oil salesman.....