Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Doctor’s View About The New mRNA Vaccines
American Thinker ^ | 15 Feb, 2021 | Thomas Siler

Posted on 02/15/2021 4:41:57 AM PST by MtnClimber

It’s important to know both what we know about the new vaccines and what we don’t know.

I’ve practiced for 35 years. I am always honest with my patients, even if conversations are difficult or confrontational. I will also be honest about saying “I don’t know.”

SNIP

What do we know about the new TYPE of vaccine being given?

Pfizer and Moderna were the first COVID-19 vaccines to be approved. Both use a new technology called mRNA vaccine, which has never been broadly given to a human population to prevent any disease.

Let that sink in for a moment.

All previous vaccines take a weakened virus or a piece of the virus and inject it into humans to induce an immune response sufficient to prevent a disease. Pfizer’s and Moderna’s vaccines inject mRNA, which is a protein code that instructs the body to make a part of COVID-19’s spike protein that will then induce an immune response.

Our bodies daily use our own mRNA to carry instructions from DNA to make various proteins the body uses. While this new vaccine science sounds intriguing, it has never been tried in humans in this scope. It may be a breathtaking scientific advancement heralding a new path for all vaccines. It may also be less effective or have currently unknown side effects.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Society
KEYWORDS: covid; covid19; dnaoperatingsystem; dsj03; vaccine; vaccines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last
To: zek157

Honestly I don’t think your a for questioning. The one thing this has taught us who are watching is that politically people are standing science on its ear. You had the disease. I see no reason for you to be vaccinated. Surely If there were repeat cases we would have seen them in the last 15 months.

Why vaccinate against something that it appears you are immune from. Additionally should you contract the disease against what appears to be a sizable set of odds, you could get the monoclonal antibodies in sufficient time to arrest disease from progressing.

While I don’t think you would develop cytokine storm down the road as it makes little sense as Covid also in its infective form being an RNA virus would predispose you to future cytokine storm on re-exposure and it does not seem to happen, I don’t think this is a legitimate worry.

However you have had it, you should have developed T cell immunity and I think it is not only reasonable but well within the understanding of disease to forego the vaccine.

You are hardly nuts.


21 posted on 02/15/2021 5:12:59 AM PST by gas_dr (Trial lawyers AND POLITICIANS are Endangering Every Patient in America: INCLUDING THEIR LIBERTIES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“..there is a theoretical possibility of DNA (or RNA) vaccines causing autoimmunity or that the DNA would integrate into the human genome”

Sanjay Mishra, Staff Scientist, Vanderbilt University Medica Center. (one of Facebook’s fact-checkers)


22 posted on 02/15/2021 5:13:41 AM PST by kanawa ((Twitter quitter))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

cuck


23 posted on 02/15/2021 5:14:39 AM PST by dforest (RATS are criminals and frauds. Hide anything that belongs to you. They will steal it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OldGoatCPO

I don’t disagree that it is a choice. As is every other vaccine. As is everything else.

Tell me why this red herring argument is even offered?


24 posted on 02/15/2021 5:15:58 AM PST by gas_dr (Trial lawyers AND POLITICIANS are Endangering Every Patient in America: INCLUDING THEIR LIBERTIES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dforest

Well. There is an argument for the ages.


25 posted on 02/15/2021 5:17:00 AM PST by gas_dr (Trial lawyers AND POLITICIANS are Endangering Every Patient in America: INCLUDING THEIR LIBERTIES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Excellent, very fair article. Bookmaeking to share with others.

Bottom line:

1. The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are effective at significantly lowering incidents of diagnosed Covid-19.

2. Usually 5 years of data is needed to say a vaccine is safe. With only 4 months of data, these should still be regarded as experimental.

3. “Our history shows there are good reasons why new medicines and vaccines are not rushed into widespread use until we have multiple studies and time to assess the safety and efficacy of the new treatments. If the death rate from COVID-19 were much higher, it might make the risks acceptable to try an experimental vaccine. Given that the COVID-19 death rate is a little higher than a bad flu, my opinion is that younger and healthier people need a more rigorous risk/benefit analysis before taking the mRNA vaccines.”

Me, I’ll keep taking ivermectin and HCQ every 2 weeks; vitamins D3 5000, C 1500 daily; zinc 50 every 2 days, and wait a few more months on the vaccines.


26 posted on 02/15/2021 5:19:33 AM PST by Basket_of_Deplorables (Convention Of States is our only hope now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

It’s different in the sense that it’s not an mRNA vaccine, requires one dose, doesn’t have to be stored at extreme temperatures. However it does contain fetal DNA fragments as it’s cultured in cells obtain from aborted (murdered) children.

Also vaccines contain other contaminants. Ask yourself why any vaccine is necessary for this virus when successful therapeutics are being used (like Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin).


27 posted on 02/15/2021 5:20:13 AM PST by surroundedbyblue (Proud to be an Infidel & a deplorable. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr

No strong opinion on the vaccine, but I can tell you why the “my body, my choice” meme is out there - this is the first vaccine where there is serious talk about making it mandatory. A “vaccine passport” for example. Or a requirement to travel or even stay employed. That has a lot of people concerned. It is the masking requirement times ten.


28 posted on 02/15/2021 5:22:39 AM PST by T. P. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps

Keep in mind, all of this “terror” for something that is 99.9% SURVIVABLE.


29 posted on 02/15/2021 5:22:58 AM PST by HypatiaTaught (president fraud of the divided states of China)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OldGoatCPO

Wife and I both (75) had Covid-19 and it was less than a cold by far. She has no co-morbidiities. I, while in exceptionally good health, have several - I’m overweight by 20 lbs, but exceptionally active, have cardiovascular disease/triple bypass/aortic valve replacement - but no current blockage or flow restriction and cholesterol is under control.

I had 2 - 4 hour stints of aches & some chills, no fever, headache or anything else, ibuprofen took care of problems. Tiredness for a week or two. Wife had mild cough, very slight fever, very tired for 2 weeks, slept a lot which is totally unlike her.

We both are fine now. Immunized. From Covid itself, not the vaccine. NOT getting any vaccine!


30 posted on 02/15/2021 5:25:06 AM PST by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: T. P. Pole

Fair enough.


31 posted on 02/15/2021 5:25:18 AM PST by gas_dr (Trial lawyers AND POLITICIANS are Endangering Every Patient in America: INCLUDING THEIR LIBERTIES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: zek157

This article mentions ADE...

...But not the potential for a bio-weapon to trigger ADE in the vaxxers and wipe out western civilization:
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=241577


32 posted on 02/15/2021 5:25:44 AM PST by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr

cuck


33 posted on 02/15/2021 5:27:54 AM PST by dforest (RATS are criminals and frauds. Hide anything that belongs to you. They will steal it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: zek157

I agree with you for the same reasons.

However the majority of my family, I got a big one, agree to avoid this vaccine.


34 posted on 02/15/2021 5:29:13 AM PST by HypatiaTaught (president fraud of the divided states of China)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dforest

Wow am I blinded by your rhetorical prowess and intellectually stimulating argument. It’s amazing how one word can simultaneously be revolting as well as demonstrate the thorough grasp of the issues and ability to pen an cogent argument.

Amazing!


35 posted on 02/15/2021 5:30:43 AM PST by gas_dr (Trial lawyers AND POLITICIANS are Endangering Every Patient in America: INCLUDING THEIR LIBERTIES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

And the masks are labeled with warnings that they don’t stop transmission


36 posted on 02/15/2021 5:32:04 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Call on Joe Biden to follow Donald Trump's example and donate his annual salary to charity. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

From the article:
“There was also a trend towards those getting the vaccine having a less severe disease and needing less hospitalization.”

Out of 21,500 participants, 9 placebo people needing hospitalization vs 1 vaccinated is NOT a TREND. It is random.

Also:
“It was hard to ascertain death avoidance in these small studies.”

Not “hard”, but IMPOSSIBLE. Zero people died from COVID in a sample like this.

The problem is the “warp speed”.


37 posted on 02/15/2021 5:32:05 AM PST by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

It is not a vaccine that is offered, it is genetic modification, genetic engineering.

No thank you.


38 posted on 02/15/2021 5:32:15 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: gas_dr

The “emotional” response you cited is on the part of those lining up to take a medication with unknown long term effects, questionable efficacy, & only emergency use authorization. Sounds more emotional and less rational to me.

And please do continue to play the “I’m a doctor so I’m smarter than you” card. That sort of arrogance does well for your credibility. Just because I’m a nurse, I can still read. Besides, there are lots of physicians and nurses who agree with me.


40 posted on 02/15/2021 5:33:00 AM PST by surroundedbyblue (Proud to be an Infidel & a deplorable. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson