Posted on 02/14/2021 8:42:43 AM PST by patriot torch
As of January 11 2021, the openvaers report has compiled to date the following record of covid vaccine related injuries and deaths.
These statistics are compiled from HHS at vaers.hhs.gov
Extrapolated from these reports lists 12697 covid vaccine adverse event reports. For which the breakdown of these statistics is as follows:
Through Feb 5 2021
653 deaths
1,382 hospitalizations
2,792 urgent care
1,654 office visits
154 anaphalaxis
145 Bell's Palsey
(I'm certain this will be attacked by the usual perp's but let the data speak for itself)
Quote~The vast majority of average Americans are more than willing to listen to the pros and cons and are selecting to be vaccinated. Why is this a problem.
Yeah, gee, its not as though there is any bias, data manipulation or censorship from YOUR side right?
And its not as though there is biased reporting in the media right? Or as if there was a high amount of biased indoctrination at public schools and colleges. Shudder the thought!
I acknowledge your attack on me by calling me a wicked little snake when I did not address you
I have said nothing untrue except quoting what you have said.
I reject I have made a hit and run accusation but instead pointed out behavior which is easily researched for all to see.
Good day.
Quote~And that number is suspect. Taking into account coincidence and not cause.
Just to clarify, are we applying this test to cdc’s data manipulation statistics? I would love to hear your answer. No hurry. Take your time.
It’s the brainless fear monkeys that are trying to scare everyone away from the vaccine not vice versa. That shoe must fit pretty tightly on you
Wow. I see you must have had discussion with this esteemed Freeper as well.
I interpret data as ithey are presented. In this current data set there is a gross numerical statement without any drilling down on it. The truth is the matter is cross referencing the number of deaths do not show a direct cause of the vaccination is death. These data are quite suspect.
I am not a CDC cheerleader. I answer their data by scientific interpretation as well. Of course having been trained as a scientist I am able to critically evaluate data.
You don’t present any logical critique of the data regarding vaccination. You simply use the smear of bias. You broaden it to the emotional statement of all media and universities. Instead I would recommend you provide a valid critique of the data
When it comes to bias do you understand what bias really is? I think you are confusing opinion with bias.
Quote~Don’t worry. He always hides behind being sarcastic when called on outlandish statements. He will also no doubt disavow his statements to backlava about crossing the interstate blindfolded is also an example comparable to the statistical analysis of three phases of prospective trials.
It’s pretty common with him.
Translation....
Don’t worry, gas dr. Always hides behind outlandish statements about having sex with demons. He will however no doubt duck and cover when called out on this overhyped exageration. Much like his citations from manipulated data in confirmation with the big tech censorship to scrub all disenting opinions.
Its pretty common with him.
(There, Fixed it)
I sent you the posts demonstrating exactly what the American front lien doctors have said. They are not front line doctors. They are not practicing. And they do believe in what you have written.
Smear me all you want. I can back my statements up. Others cannot. But remain loud in doing so.
Moderna said this:
There is typically an extremely high rate of attrition for product candidates across categories of medicines proceeding through clinical trials. These product candidates may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy profile in later stages of clinical trials despite having progressed through nonclinical studies and initial clinical trials.
A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in later-stage clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or unacceptable safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in earlier trials.
Most investigational medicines that commence clinical trials are never approved as products
"VAERS is a passive reporting system, meaning it relies on individuals to send in reports of their experiences to CDC and FDA. VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused a health problem"
"Anyone can report an adverse event to VAERS."
"VAERS accepts reports from anyone. Patients, parents, caregivers and healthcare providers (HCP) are encouraged to report adverse events after vaccination to VAERS even if it is not clear that the vaccine caused the adverse event."
"Are all adverse events reported to VAERS caused by vaccines?"
"No. Some adverse events might be caused by vaccination and others might be coincidental and not related to vaccination. Just because an adverse event happened after a person received a vaccine does not mean the vaccine caused the adverse event."
"VAERS accepts reports of adverse events following vaccination without judging the cause or seriousness of the event. VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused an adverse event, but it is good at detecting unusual or unexpected patterns of reporting that might indicate possible safety problems that need a closer look."
https://vaers.hhs.gov/about.html
https://vaers.hhs.gov/faq.html
Any attempt to use VAERS as a catalog of problems caused by a vaccine is dishonest. It's fake news. VAERS is merely a reporting system for anything bad that happens at any point later than vaccine dose administration. If you fall down the stairs and die, that's entered into VAERS. If you slip on some ice and break your hip, that gets entered into VAERS. Everything goes into VAERS. The purpose of VAERS is to provide researchers with enough data points to single out rare problems with a vaccine from random events that happen normally.
If you take a population of 30 million people - particularly if that population skews elderly - some of them are going to fall, some of them are going to have heart attacks, and some of them are going to die. With or without a vaccine. Claiming everything in VAERS is because of a vaccine is fake news. It's a lie.
“VAERS is a passive reporting system,”
PASSIVE, not mandatory. That is a key detail when attempting to use their stats.
It’s mandatory for healthcare providers to report.
The big take-away is that what gets reported into VAERS is simply a list of events that occurred in some period of time following a vaccination. There is no causal link established by anything in VAERS; simply a list of stuff that happened later.
Any connection made without an actual investigation is guilty of the logical fallacy post hoc ergo propter hoc. In other words, it’s a false claim.
As of today, there have been zero deaths causally linked to any COVID-19 vaccine in the US or the UK.
So, reviewing your citation of purported evidence. From a weekly newsletter, First off I notice his unbiased name calling attacking American Frontline Doctors member, Lee Merritt, (an American orthopedic surgeon) and labeling him as a “bumbling neophyte” and what was that criticism you just launched against a FR member being sarcastic?
And to narrow down on your personal attacks directed towards Dr. Stella Immanuel, she suggests that dna manipulation may be involved with the vaccine creation. And I cite:
“DNA is being used in medical treatments and that researchers are working on a vaccine to prevent people from becoming religious. She also believes in a conspiracy by the “Illuminati” to destroy the world with abortion, gay marriage, and of all things, children’s toys.”
I would not rule that out. Can you?
As for your demons claim, he (the author of the newsletter goes on to state,
“As far as gynecological diseases go, they can be caused by having sex with witches and demons that appear in dreams.”
So is this added inuendo enhancing her words or exact quote? And even if it is, thats one doctor of ( ) a far stretch from the way in which you attempt to cast this net upon the entire membership.
And now onto your perceived wide reaching accusations that several (emphasis added) AFD’s have been arrested. Concerning one member, Dr. Simone Gold, yes, she was arrested. On January 6 at the Capital. (Are you attempting to suggest all who were arrested were somehow deserving of ridicule and slanderous statements? Perhaps some were political targets. The author of this hit piece suggests she was part of an “attack” is that your charge as well?
Continuing to quote:
“She has a sordid history of attacking Dr. Fauci’s sound scientific advice and claiming that COVID-19 vaccines are “experimental biological agents.”
So is she “sordid” for calling into question the ethics and integrity of a disgraced known liar named dr. Fauci? Even you refused to stand behind his character in a previous thread. Many would support her claims that these vaccines are indeed, “experimental biological agents” whats to disagree?
Continuing....
“She warns people not to be “coerced” into taking them. Lockdowns, this guru.....”
Again, I must interject to point out his name calling, but I digress...
“Lockdowns, this guru maintains, have mental health effects that are more harmful than those caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus...”
And this is disputable??? Really?
“which according to her, are minimal. Dr. Gold trots out the usual nonsensical trope about 99% of infections by the virus being harmless. While it is true that most infected people experience mild or moderate symptoms, roughly 10-15% progress to serious disease and about 5% become critically ill. In some cases, symptoms can linger for months, maybe even years.”
Roughly 99 percent do recover. And many of the lasting effects (undoubtedly attributed to effects of aging and comorbidities) but will undoubtedly be attributed to covid.
And now it really gets interesting as the sarcasm rolls out. (What was that you said about sarcasm btw?)
“In any case, these fine specimens of the medical profession maintain that there is no need to worry even if someone contracts COVID-19 because “simple effective treatments are available.”
And this is in dispute????
Ah yes, that 60 year old arsenac known as hydroxycloriquin. The same highly effective treatment for many illnesses including maleria. But since bad orange man endorsed its effectiveness, citing highly successful track records from Dr’s who have been using it for effective treatment of covid. But the real problem is, its cost effective treatment value. At pennies per dose, how is big pharma to reap their dividens? And if its easily treatable, then how is it possible to employ “fear porn” demanding vaccines? Or to rig an election? Shall we continue?.....
“It is at this point that the snake in the grass, namely hydroxychloroquine, rears its head. Not only is this medication presented as a treatment, but hydroxychloroquine is also claimed to prevent infection if taken prophylactically. Initially, there were some seductive results with hydroxychloroquine, but subsequent trials that were better designed failed to produce any positive results and some even suggested complications in terms of heart function.”
Oh... I would love to hear you dispute the 180 on hcq. Suddenly now that orange man is out, there may be truth to what these “fine specimens of the medical profession maintain.”
( care to debate that DOCTOR? )
To be continued. But for now I will post this so I don’t accidentally lose it in cyberspace on my I Phone.
I’ll cut my risks where I can.
You do what you wish.
These are not my attacks. These are the words in reputable journals and academies and news sources for physicians
I am under no illusion you will be swayed but the facts are the facts. Minimal practice. Not front line doctors. Trying to represent something they are not.
They are an intensely discredited organization.
I am sorry you don’t like it but it does not change it
And you are welcome to spend your time doing whatever it is you do. I, however, am going to spent this beautiful valentines evening with the love of my life and my soulmate. Please don’t mistake my silence as I sign of for anything else than I have erred things to do this evening.
I wish you the same and a blessed Sunday night.
Continuing......
Interesting to note the date of this newsletter Feb. 4 2021. Correlating that with this authors response, you would think that the fda’s reversal to undecided would be cited. But the reason for this newsletter is to slander and deceive. Not to inform. Now, lets continue...
“Initially, there were some seductive results with hydroxychloroquine, but subsequent trials that were better designed failed to produce any positive results and some even suggested complications in terms of heart function.”
There is an old saying that says show me the money, and I’ll show you the results. Follow the $ funding of these tests. Given the political and financial pressure from corrupt politicians and big pharma, isn, t it highly likely to produce the results requested? Wink, wink... Besides, and RELIABLE test results would be scrubbed and censored from the internet. Ever hear ofthose practiceswithbig tech? Its the latest rage in silicone valley.
Onto the next political target, Ivermectin. Simply do a search on the net. But why search? Your link illustrates my point.
“Certainly, ivermectin is not a “magic bullet” that targets COVID-19 as claimed.”
Imagine that......love the next part...
“
Then there are the conspiracy theories. “Big Pharma” is said to be hiding hydroxychloroquine benefits because this cheap drug would undermine the potential profits from vaccines. And of course, as the convoluted story goes, those vaccines have not been properly tested and mess with our DNA. This handful of physicians, who have no specific training in epidemiology, virology or infectious disease, claim to have better knowledge of COVID-19 than the thousands of academic and pharmaceutical researchers who have forged specialized careers in these areas.”
Translation, (we have highly qualified specialists in this field such as cnn analysts, and we have renounded doctors of immunology like DOCTOR BILL GATES, and head of the cdc dr.fauci. and everything dr. Fauci says is truth, well at least until its challenged the next week by DR. FAUCI.)
(”This handful of physicians, who have no specific training in epidemiology, virology or infectious disease,”)
“Dr. Merritt buys into all these conspiracy theories and the various pseudoscientific treatments. Masks are useless, she says, and meetings with friends should be encouraged. Along with her Frontline Doctor colleagues, she demonstrates an ignorance of science and the scientific method, and her rebuke of COVID vaccines puts people who follow her advice at risk.”
Tell us Doctor Gas, how effective are the masks? If one is good, two should be twice as good right? Do you agree with Doctor Joe Biden? Do they prevent transmission? Do they transmit “FEAR PORN”?
“She does, however, get one thing right. In the video, she mentions that a low blood level of vitamin D is a risk factor for COVID-19 and correctly suggests that supplements may be useful”
Yup! I’ll place my bets on a healthy immune system rather then genetically altering my DNA, via biochemical agents. Yup, place me in the skepik column. That is still allowed right dr.? Or is that only because FR has not yet been deplatformed by your side of the political aisle? Both sides of the debate is afterall healthy right dr?
And I just love his unbiased closing remarks....
“As for the rest of the garbled word salad in this painful thirty-minute long video, let’s be kind and just say “ummm, there is no evidence.”
Enjoy :-)
quote~I interpret data as ithey are presented. In this current data set there is a gross numerical statement without any drilling down on it. The truth is the matter is cross referencing the number of deaths do not show a direct cause of the vaccination is death. These data are quite suspect.”
Yeah, love the response. Any opposition “data” presented is suspect. But data you people present is without question? Its already been proven that your side of the aisle feeds on data manipulation. If the data your side presents, were subjected to the same standards you people attempt to place on us, you would have nothing at all but a bad flu season. Albeit manipulated and transmitted via wuhan china.
Quote~You don’t present any logical critique of the data regarding vaccination. You simply use the smear of bias. You broaden it to the emotional statement of all media and universities. Instead I would recommend you provide a valid critique of the data
When it comes to bias do you understand what bias really is? I think you are confusing opinion with bias.
I already provided several links of dissent. They are highly reputable despite your bias. But for your entertainment I’ll repeat the post. Enjoy:
See what American frontline doctors have to say about these vaccines and hcq.
See what Bill Gates real mission is
Find out why there has been a mea culpa on a cheap and highly effective treatment known as hcq
A video you need to see. Pay close attention beginning at the 22:30 point
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BLfw5ROCffa9/
Globalists-vaccines & population control
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Q63Gagog0Fk The newest financial bubble
https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=92&v=DKcSNrGf4dE&feature=youtu.be
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.