I interpret data as ithey are presented. In this current data set there is a gross numerical statement without any drilling down on it. The truth is the matter is cross referencing the number of deaths do not show a direct cause of the vaccination is death. These data are quite suspect.
I am not a CDC cheerleader. I answer their data by scientific interpretation as well. Of course having been trained as a scientist I am able to critically evaluate data.
quote~I interpret data as ithey are presented. In this current data set there is a gross numerical statement without any drilling down on it. The truth is the matter is cross referencing the number of deaths do not show a direct cause of the vaccination is death. These data are quite suspect.”
Yeah, love the response. Any opposition “data” presented is suspect. But data you people present is without question? Its already been proven that your side of the aisle feeds on data manipulation. If the data your side presents, were subjected to the same standards you people attempt to place on us, you would have nothing at all but a bad flu season. Albeit manipulated and transmitted via wuhan china.