Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: blueunicorn6
The whole thing is a travesty.

Article 1 Section 3 states that the Chief Justice shall preside -- but he isn't. So this isn't a real impeachment trial.

Article 1 Section 3 also contains a crucial AND:
Judgement in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States

It's a "logic" thing. The "and" is not casual. First you remove, AND then you disqualify. If you cannot do they first thing, then you cannot do the second thing. They cannot remove THEREFORE they cannot disqualify.

This is a Bill of Attainder and nothing less. The Legislature is voting to punish someone who displeases them. That's also unconstitutional.

11 posted on 02/09/2021 9:18:19 AM PST by ClearCase_guy ("I see you did something -- why you so racist?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

I like your word “travesty” and the way you broke it down in just a few sentences. Your observation as regards logic is the crux of the matter because so few in DC are able to operate logically with guidance from common sense.


14 posted on 02/09/2021 9:23:22 AM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

If we as a nation cannot agree on the meaning of the word “impeachment” then what other words will we find new meanings for?

Theft?

Lying?

Murder?


15 posted on 02/09/2021 9:24:08 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson