Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 2aProtectsTheRest

The β€œvaccine” has an emergency use authorization (EUA). If rule of law existed the EAU would become invalid and the vaccine would have to be pulled with a treatment like ivermectin..


10 posted on 02/08/2021 5:27:35 AM PST by zek157
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: zek157

πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»


13 posted on 02/08/2021 5:29:54 AM PST by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation πŸ™πŸ»πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: zek157
"If rule of law existed the EAU would become invalid and the vaccine would have to be pulled with a treatment like ivermectin.."

Why?

We have data from Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 clinical trials from multiple countries and over 100,000 study participants demonstrating that the vaccines are safe and effective. They keep people out of the hospital and out of the morgue. Why on Earth would we give that up?

Ivermectin can be an effective treatment in a lot of cases. It's not a miracle cure-all. Anyone who tells you it is is either ignorant or lying. The closest thing to a "cure" for COVID-19 is monoclonal antibody therapy (which is what President Trump got), and even that isn't 100%. The vaccines, monoclonal antibody therapy, Ivermectin, and other tools function together to provide layers of protection to keep people alive. Stripping off layers for no reason doesn't make sense.

Banning the vaccines makes less sense than banning Ivermectin.

14 posted on 02/08/2021 5:34:59 AM PST by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson