Posted on 02/07/2021 3:22:22 PM PST by RandFan
He totally threw Wallace. He wanted to spring the video of Trump allegedly encouraging violence but Rand anticipated it.
I thought it was good anyway..
I would support either of them, though Gov. Noem rates a little higher with me. 8>)
“Well, it got my attention...”
No surprise there.
I cannot have this Jim. I cannot be in a perfectly normal Sunday Morning Talk Show sub-thread discussing FoxNews Sunday and Chris Wallace interviewing Senator Rand Paul, and have this headcase humblegunner harassing the original poster.
RandFan has no blog to pimp, and if he were routing this ordinary Sunday talk show discussion through a blog I would not object to humblegunner's personal vendetta against bloggers.
But RandFan was simply pointing out that FoxNews' Wallace is up to his craven Murdoch-driven agitprop again, and humblegunner took it upon himself to criticize both the poster and the posting itself. This is a direct assault by humblegunner against FReepers deeply concerned about the upcoming unconstitutional Senate tribunal. I cannot have it. It. has. to. stop.
I didn’t see him speechless.
Rand was well spoken but no big drama there
Just quoting a vote is meaningless.
Rand often has reasons for his votes. I have no idea on this particular one you’d have to ask his office.
There is usually a good reason at least in his mind.., Maybe a procedural thing I don’t know.
Wallace tried to do a “gotcha” with the Trump footage on Rand but it failed big time!
Ironically Wallace gets better ratings when he’s the butt of jokes.
After his back-stabbing and untruthful comments about President Trump last week you can count me out. I’ll never vote for that craven political opportunist Ted Cruz
Of course but that is business as usual. There was no speechless pauses.
Let’s not act like the Daily Mail.
Noem/DeSantis. I could live with that ticket. I’m suspicious of Rand Paul. He does say a lot of the right things, but some of his votes say otherwise.
I think high colonic for this “ humble” gunner might be a good start
Rand Paul has been doing a great job of explaining in plain language the left’s unconstitutional excesses.
Paul is right where he belongs: blowing hot air in the U. S. Senate. He was AWOL for two months while the GOP Senate and state GOP played hot potato with the stolen election. He knew exactly what game was being played but stayed quiet rather than drop a dime on the scam.
Maybe stop with the stupid headlines?
Yes and he only gets a few mins remember to get the case across.
I thought it was quite slick
I’ve read a few remarks from Ted about Trump that were ‘not complementary’, but I may have missed him telling outright lies. It could be a matter of interpretation.
I am also one who is not hesitant to say so when i disagree with Mr. Trump. It happens.
After Rand spoke in the first minute pointing out the hypocrisy Wallace paused and wasn’t sure what to say.
Bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.