Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 01/17/21 Vol.327, Q Day 1178

qalerts.app ^ | 01/17/21 | FReeQs, FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

Today’s thread was deleted by the mods. I assume you asked for that. Good call.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I’m posting from today’s thread.

About 5 people have reported problems posting to today’s thread. One found resolution by posting to a prior post first.

[Publius]

This post is showing up on the 1/17 thread. If you go to the Chat forum articles, you’ll see that the 1/20 post is no longer there. It looks like the mods removed it.

[ransomnote]

I can see the thread and if I go to the thread directory in my profile, I can click on the 1/20/2021 thread and it opens. So I don’t know why we can see it and post on it and others can’t.

Jim, has the 1/20/2021 thread been deleted?

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

The alphabet letter now sure looks like nonsense.

Might have outlined some structures, but as an indicator of what would transpire?

If one makes vague predictions one can later claim whatever happened was forecast.

[ransomnote]

TO THOSE HAVING PROBLEMS POSTING TO THE 1/20/21 Q THREAD RIGHT NOW (UPDATE)

---

I've received email from six FReepers that they cannot post to today's new thread. Some say it has been deleted from the forum. When I check the forum, I can see it - here's a screen capture I just took:

Here's a fresh link:

Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 01/20/21 Vol.328, Q Day 1181 (freerepublic.com)

I and others are posting to it. Others are in Festival unable to see the thread at all. I've asked Jim to clarify for us.

Someone said they were able to resume posting on the 1/20/2021 thread by closing the browser tab and opening a new one (if I understood correctly).

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Prior post re this issue:

Reed13k (fifth example) has a solution that worked for him.

reed13k to ransomnote

I had an issue as well till I responded to a prior post
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ThankQ, Reed13K. We sure are getting a lot of attention for a larp. :D Wouldn't they just move on and ignore us? Why all the hate, bro? You scared? :D

 

[Twitmo]

Bill Clinton Caught Sleeping During Joe Biden’s Sermon (VIDEO)

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/

[ransomnote]

I'm a BardsFM fan - I find it perfect for the days we're in. Uplifting and forward looking.

I haven't seen the latest yet but have had a good thumbs up from a FReeper so here's the link:

Storm Dispatch- 20210120-1 - YouTube

[1_Rain_Drop]

I had received a 500 error on the new thread. It did look as if the thread had disappeared. Refreshed and it came back.

[ransomnote]

I just had a thought about the early swearing in today. I wonder if they were afraid it would be interrupted if they started at 12:00? Biden’s daughter tipped her head back in abject relief (so it seemed) as Biden was taking the oath, as if she couldn’t believe they “made it” that far.

Just a thought. They know something is up and they don’t know what it is.

Sun Tzu would approve! :D

[Calm_Cool_and_Elected]

Thanks!

[Lopeover]

Do we regret being awakened? Do we regret learning how corrupt & evil our gov’t is? Do we regret the fight to bring the abuse of children into the light? President Trump arrested more pedos & human traffickers than any President!

Do we regret learning about on the Act of 1871? Do we regret understanding the evil secret societies? Do we regret finding each other & learning that we are the majority? Do we regret giving Trump the biggest election win in US history?

Negatory-oh! We had a great time! I DO NOT REGRET Q & the anons.

Biden & Harris are illegitimate!

[EasySt]

“Negatory-oh! We had a great time! I DO NOT REGRET Q & the anons.”

“Biden & Harris are illegitimate!”

~~~~~~~~~

Thank You.

~Easy

Still In.

[woodpusher]

The United States Department of Defense sees the use of computers and the Internet to conduct warfare in cyberspace as a threat to national security. The Joint Forces Command issued a statement: ... The new United States military strategy, makes explicit that a cyberattack is casus belli for a traditional act of war. ... In 2013, a U.S. Department of Defense task force stated that nuclear weapons could be used in response to a cyber attack.

- - - - - - - - - -

We are involved in a different type of warfare which the cases you cited would not apply

Let me know when you can cite an actual change in the applicable law, or a voiding of the Constitution.

A statement from the Defense Department does not change the law that applies to them. One cannot just claim martial law and have a lawful military tribunal with jurisdiction in the United States. The Defense Department cannot do away with the courts in the United States and declare martial law. The Defense Department cannot suspend habeas corpus. A Defense Department claim of cyber warfare does not suspend the Constitution.

The original military commissions in Gitmo were carried out under presidential order and ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court. Legislative approval was acquired by the Military Commissions Act of 2006. U.S. Const., Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 9, provides, "The Congress shall have the power... To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court." The Constitution grants that power to the Congress, not the Defense Department.

There have been 8 convictions by GITMO military commissions. Three were overturned completely, one partially. Of the 8 convicted, 5 were transferred out of Gitmo.

For five scheduled for trial, proceedings have been delayed yet again to at least August 2021.

As for legal changes, there have been some. See Stevie Moreno Haire, "No Way Out: The Current Military Commission Mess at Guantanamo," 50 Seton Hall Law Review 855, 872, December 17, 2019

Addressing first the legal changes that reduced the number of chargeable war crimes, two major decisions have reshaped the landscape in this regard. Decisions in the cases of Salim Hamdan and Ali Hamza Ahmad Suliman al Bahlul on the constitutionality of certain offenses defined in the 2006 MCA have eliminated the offense called Providing Material Support for Terrorism and called into question whether inchoate conspiracy can withstand scrutiny by the federal courts. Because these were the lowest-level war crimes codified under the Act, this development may create pressure for men who may not have enough evidence against them to be charged with any currently valid war crime to plead guilty to serious offenses such as terrorism and attacking civilians.

[grey_whiskers]

And with your signup date of 2017, how do you know of Quidam, retread?

[Twitmo]

🐿 I awakened back in the 90s and avoided Twitter. But in October I asked myself,

“Can Twitter be so bad? Trump is there after all.”

“So I signed on to Twitter at the absolute worst time. Managed close to 1600 followers anyway. Had a great time during the election. Ran into Q and shrugged.

Then Water Main Wednesday. Q was a rock. They expected the Steal. I was amazed!

I will do my thing and let Q do theirs.

[Twitmo]

“The original military commissions in Gitmo were carried out under presidential order and ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court.”

Both Mark Levin and Justice Clarence Thomas were alarmed by that judicial legislation. And while Ann Coulter is now ‘out’ she is a smart scholar and she too wrote a strong legal opinion.

That is the root problem. The judiciary reflects an education system that reeks of Globalism. The judiciary is indoctrinated generally speaking to belittle originalism. Most are no longer proper citizens of the US.

Any federal civil servant who is not America First (or not pro Constitution) violates his/her oath. Such as ending Trump’s border policy. Biden violated his oath on Day 1. And any in congress who disagree are complicit.

Obvious unless you are conditioned to ignore it. They are aiding a hostile invasion. And the federal judiciary frequently ruled in favor of this invasion years ago.

[beef]

So, it looks like 12/8 is the last Q post. Am I correct?

[spacejunkie2001]

has Simon put out a video since biden’s inauguration?

[mbrfl]

Not yet. He’s made a few posts to his blog but so far no video. I would recommend listening to tonight’s X22 Report. It contains some good analysis and is very encouraging.

https://rumble.com/vd2wjr-ep.-2383b-military-control-11.3-verifies-as-1st-marker-the-end-wont-be-for-.html

[CJ Wolf]

Bags would like this. https://youtu.be/-62Rjbq28Q0