Posted on 01/13/2021 11:39:10 AM PST by ebb tide
HAMILTON, Ontario, January 13, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — A 27-year-old personal support worker suffered a severe allergic reaction including fainting, seizures, and hospitalization, when she received the abortion-tainted Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.
Deborah Tilli, a mother of two girls, had looked forward to receiving the vaccination. She said, “I wasn’t scared, I was excited. I was like, ‘I’m going to be one of the first health-care workers in the city to get the vaccine,’” CBC reports.
As is routine, she filled out the consent forms, then noticed the nurse who was looking over her file exhibited a hesitation or lack of confidence in how to proceed with her case.
“I do have a severe allergy to bumblebees, and the nurse went over that with me and even questioned me about it, but … it seemed like she really didn’t know what she was doing,” Tilli said.
Following the shot she expected to only have to wait for the normal precautionary 15 minutes. Instead, she began to feel light-headed and developed an abrupt scratch in her throat.
Though initially dismissing it as nervousness, the symptoms persisted. She spoke to the paramedic about what was happening, and was given a Benadryl shot, which seemed to work for several minutes, but “the symptoms returned and worsened.”
Tilli explained, “The supervisor from the paramedics was there and he just said ‘OK, let’s give her the EpiPen.’” However, “[w]ithin a minute, I just said, ‘Something doesn’t feel right in my body,’ and I remember just passing out and leaning over to the right.”
When she woke up in the hospital, Tilli was told that she had suffered seizures and needed CPR, yet CBC confirmed she was transported “in stable condition.”
Though she doesn’t remember much from the incident, Tilli recalled one moment quite well, accepting the possibility that she could die.
“There was a moment where, I don’t want to say I gave up, but I was just like ‘It is what it is.’ … [Days later,] when I was in bed the other night, I was thinking, ‘What if I left my two girls without a mother?’”
Colin Furness, an infection control epidemiologist at the University of Toronto, defended the safety of the vaccine despite Tilli’s experience.
“When you administer a vaccine to enough people, you’re going to get adverse reactions … there’s really two safeguards there,” Furness said.
“One is public communication that says if you have severe allergies, this is not the vaccine for you, not now, not yet. Wait for Moderna, perhaps. So everyone who has allergies should be awake and paying attention to that. Number two is people who are doing screening should also be right on top of that, so it looks like there was a double failure.”
According to CBC, Tilli did acknowledge she could have researched more about the vaccine ahead of time, yet still feels the health system “failed” her.
After six days she complained that her mind remained in a fog, that she had anxieties about the possibility of future seizures and not knowing when she would be back to normal.
CBC also reports she became emotional in her interview fearing she could lose her driver’s license or even her job assisting the elderly, which she said “is her passion outside of parenting.”
“I feel like I’ve been failed because I don’t know how long I’m going to feel this way,” she said. “There’s no one here to pay my bills. I’m a single mother of two children.”
In addition to concerns about allergies and several other aspects of these new vaccines, the public should be aware that when a patient such as Tilli is injured or even killed by such a shot, vaccine manufacturers have no liability. According to Canadian authorities, “indemnification clauses in vaccine contracts are standard” for virtually all countries in the world. Thus, if Tilli does not fully recover, she will not be eligible for a monetary settlement from Pfizer to assist her in raising her children.
Other concerns about these vaccines proceed from their having been rushed through the process of development, testing, approval and now distribution, with a new “messenger RNA” technology, no industry-standard animal trials, nor any sufficient studies on long-term effects.
Indeed, in early December, a former vice president and Chief Scientist at Pfizer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, petitioned for the halting of all testing of coronavirus vaccine candidates in Europe due to the significant safety concerns of a growing number of renowned scientists.
These dangers included “allergic” and “potentially fatal reactions,” risks that these vaccines may cause infertility in women, result in an increased vulnerability to the virus, and present unacceptable dangers of long-term effects due to a lack of proper testing.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration also drew up a document this fall listing the possible side-effects from a COVID-19 vaccine, including strokes, encephalitis, auto-immune disease, birth defects, Kawasaki disease and death.
Present reports reveal that hundreds of individuals injected with these vaccines have been admitted to the hospital while high rates of health care workers continue refusing to receive them.
LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.
‘Very healthy’ Miami obstetrician, 56, dies 16 days after receiving Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine
Portuguese mother, 41, dies two days after taking Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine
Former Pfizer VP: ‘No need for vaccines,’ ‘the pandemic is effectively over’
FDA: Death, heart attacks, stroke, blood disorders all possible side effects of COVID vaccine
Nurses, hospital staff refuse to take COVID vaccine in large numbers
Research scientist warns coronavirus vaccines have ‘terrible safety record’ historically
Doctor calls Fauci’s demand for mass COVID vaccinations ‘utter nonsense’
Pfizer COVID jab warning: No breastfeeding, avoid pregnancy for 2 months, unknown fertility impact
Hek293
Extra 2
I honestly have no idea without more context around the statement. I could speculate that some of the lipid shells encapsulating the mRNA merged with each other. I would expect that COULD diminish the effectiveness of the dose with that issue should it happen. I could further speculate that this might be a result of storing the particular dose at too high a temperature for too long.
But without a lot more context, I’m completely speculating.
There you go again letting the facts get in the way of a goo narrative! /S
Dear God...
You wuss. You can’t even address me. Thats fine. All demos there is not a 99.99+ survival rate. And in case you are incapable of math which it appears that is the case with you...95% survival means 19/20 survival. Which means 1/20 rate of death. Which is exactly what I said.
It is quite humorous when your stats confirm mine. But I have been correct all along.
What a maroon.
It means they’re either ignorant of how these vaccines were developed or are intentionally trying to mislead you.
Some vaccines use fetal stem cell lines that are derived from cells taken after abortions in the 1970s to do research and testing. They’re generally used for culturing (producing additional copies of a virus) and testing various components of a new vaccine. The mRNA vaccines don’t require any of this. They’re just a strip of mRNA encased in a lipid shell. There’s nothing to grow anymore.
The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are listed by the Charlotte Lazier Institute (pro-life group based in Virginia) as “ethically uncontroversial”: https://s27589.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/An-Ethics-Assessment-of-COVID-19-Vaccine-Programs_On-Point-46.pdf. Further, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops released a memorandum specifically stating that “Neither the Pfizer nor the Moderna vaccine involved the use of cell lines that originated in fetal tissue taken from the body of an aborted baby at any level of design, development, or production.” (https://www.usccb.org/resources/memo-to-bishops-on-vaccines-for-covid-19.pdf)
There is a caveat to that which is that a subcontractor for both Pfizer and Moderna did use fetal stem cells AFTER the vaccines were produced in order to do independent testing to confirm the results those companies had already produced. However, that USCCB memo goes on to state that “Some are asserting that if a vaccine is connected in any way with tainted cell lines then it is immoral to be vaccinated with them. This is an inaccurate portrayal ofCatholic moral teaching.”
One shot provides ~45% immunity after ~8 days. 2 shots provide 95% immunity.
Based on previous work with MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-1, this immunity is likely to last 2-3 years.
I expected as much. the email... which I later posted doesn’t go into detail on that particular point
So you’re saying the article is BS?
so many of you have lied i am tired of talking to you
you are a vain ass
i wasn’t even talking about you
get over yourself
That particular claim certainly is. At least according to most pro-life organizations, the Catholic Church, and others.
There were no fetal stem cells used to develop or produce either of the mRNA vaccines on the market today. After production and testing were completed by Pfizer and Moderna, they’re required to have their work verified by an independent third party as part of the FDA’s review process for the Emergency Use Authorization. The third party chose to use fetal stem cells in their verification process.
What the Catholic Church and others have said is that this doesn’t taint the vaccines since they were completely produced end to end without the use of fetal stem cells. What the article does is throw a smear in there with zero explanation. Which I would assume is what prompted your question asking what that meant?
I’m just supplying facts with links to the authoritative sources that verify they’re real. Up to you whether you want to do anything with that information, but I would appreciate if you could include me in any reply where you’re talking about me and what I’ve posted so I have an opportunity to respond to what’s being said about me.
It’s the polite thing to do, even if we don’t agree with one another.
Yes, it did.
Thank you for your courtesy of reply and clarity of explanation.
Welcome to FR.
The antecedent technologies used to produce the vaccines, without which their development would have been impossible, were developed using fetal cell lines.
The “Catholic Church”, of which I am a traditionalist member, has been issuing liberal and leftist oriented advice on various matters for some years. I feel sorry for contemporary Catholics who assume they are getting genuine Catholic advice from the Vatican. They aren’t.
What preservatives are they using in these vaccines ?
Which antecedent technologies are you referring to specifically, which were instrumental in the development of the mRNA platform and which relied necessarily on fetal stem cell use?
"WHAT ARE THE INGREDIENTS IN THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE?The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine includes the following ingredients: mRNA, lipids ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl) bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, and cholesterol), potassium chloride, monobasic potassium phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and sucrose" - Source
And here is Moderna:
"WHAT ARE THE INGREDIENTS IN THE MODERNA COVID-19 VACCINE?The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine contains the following ingredients: messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), lipids ( SM-102, polyethylene glyc ol [ P EG] 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG], cholesterol, and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSP C]), tromethamine, tromethamine hydrochloride, acetic acid, sodium acetate, and sucrose." - Source
Not a lot in there. mRNA with a lipid shell and some stabilizers to keep the lipid shell intact long enough for the vaccine to do its job. Not much else going on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.