Ping for your interest
Social Distancing of a minimum of 528 ft. is likely highly effective.
.
Our health agencies have probably killed over 100,000 people in the US alone by actively discouraging doctors from prescribing hydroxychloroquine and/or ivermectin for early treatment.
here is what i can tell you..of course your mileage may vary
Jim Noble is a fan of what he calls B-map ( at least for now)
Amazon Pharmacy and Walmart will fill HQC and Ivermectin
Myfreedoctor will prescribe Ivermectin if you have Covid
Pharmacies are still refusing HQC for COVID
Many doctors will not prescribe Ivermectin unless there is a strongyloides issue
Corsi’s telehealth will prescribe HQC but maybe not Ivermectin if you have Covid
Push Health may prescribe Ivermectin if you ask for a DR who will prescribe it.
There is a website keeping track daily of who will prescribe Ivermectin but I dont have it bookmarked and always have to go look,..I need to bookmark it.
Regeneron is sitting on hospital shelves and it’s not even being used. So much for the emergency.
Vit D, Vit C, Quercetin, zinc, melatonin. You can get this stuff on your own,
“In July, the FDA revoked hydroxychloroquine’s emergency use authorization as more data showed that it was not effective at treating COVID-19.”
July.
My 83 YO Wife Rita tested Positive with COVID about six weeks ago. she given an Infusion of the Eli Lilly Bamlanivimab monoclonal negating antibody. Within 2 days she began improving - within 6 days she near normal.
She is 100% back to normal and myself (Husband) never had any symptoms.
Praise God !!!
ok if one has both ivermectin and hcq which would you use?
The authors of these types of articles are obviously not aware of the meta-study reviews, how treatment met protocols change as the disease progresses through its stages, or the various cocktails used.
Silver. Kills all viruses and Bacteria 🧫 🦠
It’s free. You can make it yourself. No downside
The government sanctions it in 26000 medical products. Yet lies about use internally. Says it turns you BLUE
The government interference with the use of silver as an antibiotic workd wide is a crime against humanity
bttt
More info on various treatments:
bookmark
"Bamlanivimab: Bamlanivimab is a monoclonal antibody produced by Eli Lilly to treat COVID-19. Monoclonal antibodies are proteins developed in a laboratory that are designed to mimic the way the immune system attacks a pathogen. "
There is simply no "evidence" in these words at all. The word "mimic' is very vague, and is hardly a scientific term, so no real information is conveyed, either.
"One randomized controlled trial has found that bamlanivimab reduced the amount of the coronavirus and symptoms in outpatients. It also slightly reduced the number of patients who had to be hospitalized or go to the emergency room. Yet this was only phase two of the trial. A larger phase three needs to be conducted before the full safety and efficacy of the treatment can be determined."
No "evidence is given. Evidence would include information about who conducted the trial, and actual numbers on the outcomes. The word "slightly" is biased and clearly not factual. Real data would provide facts, not opinion. The word "yet" also conveys bias and is intended to produce doubt in the reader.
"That was enough for the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization for bamlanivimab as a treatment for COVID-19 in November. In response to the FDA’s action, the National Institutes of Health later released a statement saying at present, "there are insufficient data to recommend either for or against the use of bamlanivimab for the treatment of outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19."
The words "That was enough" and ""there are insufficient data to recommend either for or against" again convey negative opinion, and lack real facts. The words "NIH had no opinion on this" would be equally true, but would be far less biased.
In summary, don't believe anything you read in a "news"paper.
I believe I got this on a freerepublic thread a few days ago. I only bookmarked the link to the article not the thread itself. I thought it contained about the best I had heard or seen so far.
https://aapsonline.org/CovidPatientTreatmentGuide.pdf
Summarizes all HCQ studies:
Early treatment effective, late treatment not so much.
This is a bogus summary because it just goes with the Fauci-funded, rigged HCQ studies and ignores all the rest. It also goes light on the Ivermectin studies and doesn’t dig into how ridiculous the Remdesivir position—or the influence of Big Pharma in pushing such high-cost, unproven but patented treatments.