Posted on 01/04/2021 1:56:34 PM PST by KamalaKancel
Are claims to "natural born citizenship" (or even "citizenship") by Kamala Harris valid?
A narrative, based on evidentiary documents posted at https://twitter.com/kamalakancel (and referenced at the www.kamalakancel.com website), starts here.
Constitutionally, offices of President and Vice President require status as a "natural born citizen" of the USA.
A widely shared narrative is that mere birth in the USA meets this eligibility standard, regardless of parentage. However, counter-claims have not received proper legal analysis, amid attempts to limit discussion of this topic.
What has been missing from this discussion in 2020-2021 (to date), has been a supply of facts which evidence that the claims that the birth of Kamala D. Harris was of a questionable legal validity.
Terms of Admission (clarified)
Gopalan Shyamala (the mother of Kamala D. Harris, under her maiden name) gained admission to the USA on the basis of a visa granted by the immigration officials. The terms of the student visa she received, included performance requirements which were stated and sworn, in exchange for the benefit of access to scholarship within the USA.
Stated explicitly and signed, those terms included: Pursuit of a full course of study, visitation solely for the purpose of education, and an entry that was only temporary.
A rough chronology of the actions of Gopalan Shyamala, examining her compliance (or non-compliance) with those terms, based on available evidence, follows..
(Continued at: www.kamalakancel.com and https://twitter.com/kamalakancel )
Briefly,
"The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens."
Doesn’t matter.
Obama put an end to the ‘natural born citizen’ requirement. Congress and the DoJ won’t even remotely consider this.
If Grand Caliph Baraq, who was actually born in Kenya, wasn’t disqualified, why would Kamalamadingdong Devi Gopalan-Harris who has pretty credible documented California birth credentials be bounced?
If anything she has a stronger claim to being a natural born citizen then zero did. This is a waste of everybody’s time and energy and one has to wonder of the proponent isn’t simply trying to distract us from bigger issues.
While a "natural born citizen" status is required for a Vice President, based on this information, we can now also ask:
Is Kamala Harris even a "citizen" (a requirement to hold the office of a Senator)?
In Obama’s instance, we are not even sure who his genetic parents were. The claim is, that he was the child of Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama the senior, but there is no conclusive proof of that. There is probably as much certainty that Stanley Ann did not give birth at all, but faked a pregnancy to cover up an extramarital liaison between daddy Stanley Dunbar and an unidentified African American female, the child was born in Seattle area and moved by private aircraft to Hawaii, where the birth was recorded as that of Stanley Ann and Barack the senior.
I would like to see DNA evidence either proving or disproving this hypothesis. Barack Hussein Obama II has a half-sister, a comparison of the two would determine if they had the same mother or not.
In Obama's case they generated a fraudulent birth certificate to pretend he was born a U.S. citizen. In Kamala Harris's case, she was born of two non-citizens.
It's not just the fraud of running for office, it's the fraud of fundraising to do so. She could be on the hook for the full dollar amount of the fundraising and triple damages.
Obviously Obama is old news and Kamala is today’s news.
And I believe she is an anchor baby and there is ZERO chance of her being disqualified for office.
Agreed. There is enough going on, and they not only won’t touch it, they will use it to paint everyone who brings up any issue as unfounded and nutty.
Should this be fixed? Of course, it should DAMN well be fixed, and it is stupidly simple to fix. Gee, how hard could that be? REQUIRE a birth certificate.
My, that is so, soooo...difficult. And it isn’t like there are tens of millions of people running for President every four years, though the way Democrats barf up a volcano of crappy candidates, it does make one wonder.
We know why that requirement isn’t met.
The Constitution and enacted laws only mean something when they’re enforced. Obama is not a natural born citizen but he was given a pass. Harris is not a natural born citizen and she will undoubtedly be given a pass also. A big part of the mess that this country finds itself in today is the direct result of selective law enforcement for certain individuals and the convenient misinterpretation and misapplication of the Constitution.
And they wouldn't be wrong.
Sadly...
If the difference between NATURAL BORN CITIZEN & NATIVE BORN is confusing anyone:
Think about it this way:
IF you own 2 dogs who are registered AKC dogs, then their puppies can be registered puppies/dogs.
If either of those dogs isn’t registered-—then the puppies are MUTTS.
Kamala is a MUTT.
Obama was also a MUTT...
Simple enough???
NO-—You are wrong.
Barry actually had a stronger case because at least ONE of his parents-—Stanley Ann Dunham-—was an American citizen.
NEITHER of Kamala’s parents were American Citizens when she was born.
She is a CLASSIC ANCHOR BABY....
Out of more than 200 Million AMERICANS who ARE NATURAL BORN CITIZENS, I would think we could find a goodly number of persons who qualify to be Pres/VP, etc.
“Barry actually had a stronger case because at least ONE of his parents-—Stanley Ann Dunham-—was an American citizen.”
That is correct, but Sanley Ann Dunham/Obama missed a major qualification for him to be naturalized:
If your parents were married but only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have been physically present in the U.S. for at least ten years before your birth, and at least five of those years must have been after your parent reached the age of 14. As a result of a U.S. Supreme Court decision, if you were born after October 9, 1952, your parent still had to fulfill the residence requirement in order to pass citizenship on to you. His mother moved out of the country and was living in Kenya just prior to his birth from age 14 and his birth was when she was 18. So, because of that 10 years rule, she did not full fill the qualification of living in the US for the proper amount of years prior to the birth.
Additionally, there is no record of her husband coming into the country and living at the location on the birth certificates on property owned and being resided in by a college professor and wife that was not him. So she had no legal residence nor proof of the birth happening in the US as the birth announcement was phoned in, and not signed by a physician that could have delivered the child at a facility that didn’t have the name on the certificate match until it was renamed 17 years later.
wy69
Of course!
Read later.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.