Posted on 01/03/2021 6:15:44 AM PST by Taffylucy
GEORGIA EXPERTS EXPLODE THE CASE WIDE OPEN.
Media is in full gangster mode to 'disappear' hard science and explicit, detailed proof of federal crimes. WATCH PLEASE.
Understand how iron clad our case is--please give it maximum oxygen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKiyAy9vjrk
did recount compare number of ballots purchased, and delivered, did they take inventory or count all unused and spoiled ballots then subtract all voted ballots? an audit should include inventory controls and audit totals of all ballots nnot just recount cast ballots-worthless.. apparently there were none. unused ballots should not have been shredded..
Why the high rejection rate requiring adjudication? If those 105k scanned paper ballots really all required adjudication then why would the recount arrive at the same number? If they were clearly marked, and only a few required adjudication, then I would believe that the first and second counts would come out the same. But with such a high rejection rate I would expect the recount to be different.
....but then that gets us to the other overt actions taken in the runup to the election to steal it, i.e. the media censorship, the changing of election rules, the flooding of mail in ballots across the fruited plain, etc.
I agree and IMO that's where the real steal took place in several swing states.
On the video they claim there were subtractions in some counties or vote count swaps in one case. I agree that should have been easy to spot in the recount and it was not. One of the problems with almost all videos is while they waste 10's of minutes on fluff and innuendo they rarely address the facts on the ground like the recount. If there's an explanation why the recount numbers were identical in many counties, I'd like to hear it. No bonafide recount should produce identical numbers.
You are off in some sick fantasy as to my posts and motivation.
Do you know how well that was supervised? What I saw, anecdotally was observers being thwarted in some counties.
I’ve heard that Raffensperger told the Counties what their counts should be. It’s been called a top down audit. They also used the DVS machines in the recounts.
You started it.
What are you, 12 years old?
I had simply posted to another Freeper that January 6th indeed was not in the Constitution and there are possible remedies beyond that date.
Out of that you’ve spun bizarre accusations about my being some sort of traitorous communist. Get a grip.
“delay the proceedings”? how exactly does that work?
All you need is for Mitt Romney to say “no”
This may take a while, especially with minute by minute interruptions by the deep state shills, of which there are a house(s) full.
It would be interesting to see it go to the wall on the 20th, and then need to have a vote in the house by delegate!
You will have to be more specific on what you disagree with. Are you disagreeing that we counted 3 times in Georgia? We did. You originally posted to me that they did the recount with Dominion machines. Depends on which recount you are referencing, because they didn't use Dominion on the RLA hand count.
Also, they hand recounted all 100% of the ballots for the Presidential race. Note that this was to satisfy the legislated requirement that at least one race would undergo an RLA. The race chosen was the Presidential race and instead of doing a statistical sampling they decided to hand count all 100% of the paper ballots.
Let me know what it is you want me to garner from your post as a disagreement to what I posted. I'm not brushing you off, I just want to better engage with what it is you disagree with. Thanks,
They were all hand recounted without Dominion hardware. So all new tabulations were created in the human count of the paper ballots for the Presidential race in Georgia.
Also, has the State Farm video been proven to not be an instance of fraud? There were observers who were told the counting was over for the night, then the counted started back without observers. How could any election operation be run this way? Again, I want to know the truth; I am not pushing an agenda.
I'll give you my thoughts. The security system was present the whole time. I looked at a lot of the video footage and I personally think the "suitcases" were packed and put under the table to be stored until the next day when they decided to close up shop for the night. This happened while observers were still there too. You can see that happening if you watch enough of the footage. The security footage originally shown also shows them setting up that table at 8 am on the day of the election according to the presenters at the time. The cameras were turned on the whole day so it should be a simple exercise of cueing the video at the time of the fraudulent ballots being snuck into the counting room and placed under the table. Why haven't we seen such a video? I have to assume it is because the cases were packed and placed under the table just as I suggested and the video indicates.
That doesn't excuse the shenanigans IMO, but I don't think outside of shock value the video footage shows "how they did it".
One way might be to count all the paper ballots (the evidence trail of the intent of the voter) by hand and catch them red handed. Right? Well, in Georgia, that is exactly what we did.
https://livestream.com/accounts/26021522/events/8730585/videos/215443723
In the first testimony, a Georgia election official describes how certification of recount in her county and others did not reflect the differences between initial counts and constantly varying results with additional recounts.
They made three points, one of which is debatable. The debatable one is that they claim that 90% BIden precincts are statistically impossible.
I’d agree that that point needs more elaboration, and is not correct within the limited comment - though seems likely to be true in context.
I think the guy misspoke. If 105k were adjudicated, then it would have been something like an undervote maybe, where nothing is changed but the non-vote accepted. I would like to know more about this for sure. Some simple math: Let's assume I can do 2 adjudications per minute. That would be 120 per hour, or 1200 per 10 hours. Let's say ultimately for ease of math that 120,000 were adjudicated. That would require 100 three person teams to adjudicate 120,000 ballots in 10 hours. Of course my assumptions may be junk, but I don't see how they could have adjudicated that many ballots. That is why I think he misspoke.
Point 3: the machine process decremented votes. According to these presenters there is no human error that would cause the decrement. A human error would allow the possibility of a mistake then the fixing the mistake by decrementing or switching the votes.
In the end it's the final Dominion count that decides. All discussion of ballot manipulation mostly in favor of Biden just muddies the water concerning the main point.
The main point is the DATA presented by the nerds proving that a 'acronym' of ~2% favored Biden, there were vote dumps by the 10's of thousands in the wee morning or Biden, and votes taken from Trump to Biden by the hundreds.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.