Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Beach333
I disagree. Read the article at the link, and then look into Georgia’s recount laws. Georgia law prohibits a manual recount unless there are no working scanners or there’s a court order.

You will have to be more specific on what you disagree with. Are you disagreeing that we counted 3 times in Georgia? We did. You originally posted to me that they did the recount with Dominion machines. Depends on which recount you are referencing, because they didn't use Dominion on the RLA hand count.

Also, they hand recounted all 100% of the ballots for the Presidential race. Note that this was to satisfy the legislated requirement that at least one race would undergo an RLA. The race chosen was the Presidential race and instead of doing a statistical sampling they decided to hand count all 100% of the paper ballots.

Let me know what it is you want me to garner from your post as a disagreement to what I posted. I'm not brushing you off, I just want to better engage with what it is you disagree with. Thanks,

73 posted on 01/03/2021 11:19:32 AM PST by Religion and Politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Religion and Politics

I’m disagreeing that there was a 100% hand recount of votes for the candidates. There was no court order for a manual recount of the votes and it is prohibited by Georgia law to do one without a court order if the scanners are working. What Georgia has done has been misleading to a lot of people. Read the article I linked to, it wasn’t a Risk Limiting Audit at all.


84 posted on 01/03/2021 11:53:36 AM PST by Beach333 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson