Posted on 12/30/2020 5:55:14 AM PST by rickmichaels
Earlier this month, a federal judge ruled that the Wisconsin Department of Corrections cannot deny transgender surgery to a man convicted of raping his 10-year-old daughter. The ruling also means Wisconsin will put the man in a women’s prison.
U.S. District Judge James Peterson approved the request of Mark Allen Campbell, a 49-year-old Wisconsin man who identifies as female and goes by the name “Nicole Rose,” to undergo transgender surgery at taxpayer expense, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reported. Campbell has identified as female since 2013, when he first requested the operation.
The Journal-Sentinel mentioned that Campbell began serving a 34-year prison sentence in 2007 for the sexual assault of a child. The paper did not mention the exact allegations that led to his conviction. According to the criminal complaint, the man’s 10-year-old daughter told investigators that her father had sex with her, masturbated in front of her, used sex toys with her, and exposed her to pornography. Judge Peterson ruled that this man must be eligible to receive transgender surgery at taxpayer expense.
“The rights of transgender persons and sex reassignment surgery remain politically controversial, even outside the prison context. And some members of the public are outraged at any effort to improve the health and well being of inmates,” Peterson wrote. “But the true public interest lies in alleviating needless suffering by those who are dependent on the government for their care.”
While gender dysphoria, the persistent and painful identification with the gender opposite one’s biological sex, is real, it remains an open question as to whether or not transgender identity (with experimental hormones and surgery) is the right course of treatment for it.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
WTH is wrong with these people? Geez!
SPJNK.
Taxpayers providing free elective disfiguring surgery to a mentally ill imprisoned felon...ordered by a judge. We live in Bizarro World. At least the “judge” should pay for this out of his own pocket.
And when he wants to return to being a man (I use that word loosely) taxpayers will once again pick up the tab.
And why is he not instead being executed or reported as already executed.
Why wasn’t this punk put into general population for a great big dose of “prison justice”?!?!?!
This POS should have his junk removed with a rake.
too extreme.
just impeach the Obama judge, and maybe indict him.
Execution for rape is a bad idea *only* because it give the rapist an incentive to kill his victim.See Post #7 for a better question.
this is getting ridiculous with unelected and unaccountable Judges ORDERING Funds from the Taxpayers to be spent when there is NO Legislative Act or Law allowing it.
REMEDY:
In All Judicial acts and decisions ordering funds to be dispersed from the Treasury Department without a Legislated Act Authorizing said expenditure, SHALL Be paid for by a Special Assessment on the Incomes and Assets of ALL Officers of the Court operating or residing within the State.
I’d chop off his privates for free during a vacation, if needed.
As transgenderism is a prime example of the proverbial pot giving the potter back talk (rebellion) it would seem likely that their delusions come from demonic influence.
They're Democrats.
We live in evil and dangerous times.
Shoot it.
I can take care of this issue for $0.50.
What does that stand for?
Some People Just Need Killing
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.