The time to contest the land usage was 200 years ago. It’s way past 7 years. Probably a corrupt judge. Though these days “corrupt judge” would be redundant.
Most men have a price: Norfolk comments in A Man for All Seasons concerning More “ . . . he was the only judge since Cato who didn’t accept bribes!”
All of the Potomac river right up to the shore in Virginia is part of the state of Maryland.
“Right of Way” is enshrined in all property law. This is basic miscarriage of justice clearly greased by corruption and payoffs.
Get ready for many coming judicial decisions that go against American heritage and try to negate history. The traitor globalists control the courts and will do their part to destroy the American nation.
> “Probably a corrupt judge. Though these days “corrupt judge” would be redundant.”
Keeper.
I'm surprised that the court didn't rule that an easement existed. If people customarily use land to transit or even to dwell and the property owner does not make a claim within a set number of years (usually seven), "squatter's rights" apply. The transfer of ownership does not restart the clock.