To: BuffaloJack
“Nothing can compare to the John Wayne version.”
I think casting Glen Campbell, who had never acted a day in his life, in such a major role, really brought down the original. He was awful.
To: circlecity
I thought it gave his role authenticity.................
15 posted on
12/28/2020 7:59:30 AM PST by
Red Badger
( “The goal of socialism is communism.”... Vladimir Lenin)
To: circlecity
So awful that John Wayne’s performance looked Oscar-worthy.
So there’s that.
17 posted on
12/28/2020 8:01:00 AM PST by
Bratch
To: circlecity
I think casting Glen Campbell, who had never acted a day in his life, in such a major role, really brought down the original. He was awful.I thought Campbell was pretty bad, but he was not a deal-breaker for me. I thought Ricky Nelson was pretty bad in Rio Bravo, but not bad enough to sink the movie.
22 posted on
12/28/2020 8:08:04 AM PST by
Sans-Culotte
(11/3-11/4/2020 - The USA became a banana republic.)
To: circlecity
Agree on the casting of Glen Campbell in the original. During that era, it was common to throw pop music stars into films. Almost never a good result.
Then during the 1970s, it became common to throw TV actors into recording music albums, almost always with disastrous results. I present as examples Willie Aames, John Travolta, and the Brady Bunch.
Anyway, I liked the 2010 remake by Coen Brothers. Both that and the original version are classics.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson