[ProtectOurFreedom]

I hope you are right. But saying “that is possible” is a lot different than saying “that happened.”

[Robert DeLong]

It's an affidavit that confirms that the software was either developed very poorly, or intentionally leaving it extremely capable of being manipulated. that is the soul intent of this affidavit. remember, Dominion has said that these things were not possible, so this affidavit dispels their argument.

this affidavit is not meant to corroborate that fraud was done, just that fraud can be done. You have to first show that an expert says fraud can be done so that they cannot refute it and be unchallenged in their refusal. Once that is established, you can then start presenting evidence of fraud being done.

Does that help make it clear what this affidavit's function is?

[Mr. K]

I agree, you are 100% correct.

But the statistical data would be useless if it was proven “not possible” to enter fraudulent data. Do you see what I’m getting at?

Statistical data is gonna be extremely important unless we get one of the conspirators to come forward and say “yes I did it”. People rarely commit crimes in front of people.