[Robert DeLong]

It's an affidavit that confirms that the software was either developed very poorly, or intentionally leaving it extremely capable of being manipulated. that is the soul intent of this affidavit. remember, Dominion has said that these things were not possible, so this affidavit dispels their argument.

this affidavit is not meant to corroborate that fraud was done, just that fraud can be done. You have to first show that an expert says fraud can be done so that they cannot refute it and be unchallenged in their refusal. Once that is established, you can then start presenting evidence of fraud being done.

Does that help make it clear what this affidavit's function is?

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

You have to first show that an expert says fraud can be done so that they cannot refute it and be unchallenged in their refusal. Once that is established, you can then start presenting evidence of fraud being done.

This above is exactly the reason why Sydney Powell is an inept election law attorney. Apparently she also believes the above.