Posted on 12/21/2020 3:10:47 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
The MSM would like the public to believe that Ron Watkins was chosen to create this brief when #5 of his brief states:
I am a network and information security expert with nine years of experience as a network and information defense analyst and a network security engineer. In my nine years of network and information security experience, I have successfully defended large websites and networks against major and powerful cyberattacks.
~~~~ THe guy has an international reputation for his ITsecurity expertise
It’s an affidavit as to how the Dominion Voting System works, which in turn exposes how easily it is to be corrupted by those operators intent on being nefarious. It is not intended to be proof as to what an operator did or did not do.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/d7eddj/4chan-does-first-good-thing-pulls-off-the-heist-of-the-century1
https://youtu.be/W6uGP8hHwrQ
How 4Chan’s Worst Trolls Pulled Off the Heist of the Century
she’s hurting the effort. she has always been hurting the effort, but now even the Sidney fanboys and fangirls should be incapable of denying that she’s hurting the effort.
Exactly. Sidney Powell has been a joke since day one, and I suspect that reason she left employment as a Federal prosecutor is because her delusions were disruptive to real work getting done. She is the Queen of Tin Foil Hats.
No it doesn’t, actually. It leads to an affidavit by a network and information security expert with nine years of experience as a network and information defense analyst and a network security engineer. In his nine years of network and information security experience, he has successfully defended large websites and networks against major and powerful cyberattacks.
Ron Watkins is not credible by any stretch of the imagination.
Yes, the affidavit is just a recitation of parts of the Dominion user manual followed by a series of unsupported allegations. But more importantly it’s a successful troll that illustrates that Sydney Powell will accept anything.
this affidavit is not meant to corroborate that fraud was done, just that fraud can be done. You have to first show that an expert says fraud can be done so that they cannot refute it and be unchallenged in their refusal. Once that is established, you can then start presenting evidence of fraud being done.
Does that help make it clear what this affidavit's function is?
This is posted in Chat. Of course I made the title.
Sydney Powell has outperformed Stiff Sessions, Barr, Wray, Raffenberger, Kemp, Carr, combined.
From what I can gather about the guy, he is supposed to be a computer geek and is merely stating the capabilities of Dominion machines. The point is that the machines do in fact have the capability built into them to manipulate the vote. The built in feature is what is the danger. It begs the question why was it put there if not to be used.
While I don't believe or follow Q, I can in no way state with confidence that Q is not who he claims he is.
Now you are starting a conspiracy .
Watkins isn’t Q .
He is a very good IT guy and if you looked at his twitter he is fight like hell to expose the China ties in the government . He has the ability to read all the China rights all over their webpages cause he is fluent in Chinese (He is NOT Chinese BTW )
Quit being an idiot .
Yes - except for the proof-of-concept video out of Coffee County Georgia, boi.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.