Posted on 12/21/2020 3:10:47 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
DECLARATION OF RONALD WATKINS
I, Ronald Watkins, hereby state the following:
1. I am a United States citizen currently residing in Japan.
2. I am an adult of sound mind. All statements in this declaration are based on my personal knowledge and are true and correct.
----more at link---
(Excerpt) Read more at courtlistener.com ...
I say: “I just came from the woods and met a man who said he saw Bigfoot”.
You say: “He didn’t see Bigfoot and there is no evidence that he did”.
See how unbelievably stupid your logic is?
Just because 50 different buffoons say there was a raid in Frankfurt does not make it true.
What did he write that was incorrect? Appears to be entire factual. And his credentials are obviously far and way above the porn website administrator you are defending.
All facts that everybody has known since day one.
Is this news to you?
Anyway, shill. I got to go wrap Christmas presents. Its been a rare treat schooling you.
So just ponder what I have said and maybe you'll get your mind right.
You’re just not that good at this.
But 50 million idiots saying it didn't makes it untrue.
Do I got that right?
My logic is flawless, as usual. And you get yours out of a computer class.
Ssshhhh.
Grownups are talking.
Are you capable of wrapping your Christmas presents? I have my doubts.
“Appears to be entire factual...”. “Appears” is the operative word here. “Appearances” have been used by magicians and carnival barkers for centuries to separate fools from their money.
You say: “He didn’t see Bigfoot and there is no evidence that he did”.
So you're comparing a tree falling to bigfoot?
Yea, that's logical.
Maybe you're too goofy to argue with.
Go read that guy's post again. He was talking about YOU, ya knucklehead.
And your credibility takes another hit.
“Appears to be entire factual...”. “Appears” is the operative word here. “Appearances” have been used by magicians and carnival barkers for centuries to separate fools from their money.
You are finally right about something. I totally suck at it.
But I always give it the old college try.
I am putting up $1000 to back up my credibility. Which will be proven later this week or next. Are you willing to back up your credibility? (What little you have).
I am saying that claiming that something someone told you is evidence, in and of itself, is laughable.
Jay Han Retweeted
Jim Hoft
@gatewaypundit
·
2h-OH DARN.
Sidney Powell Spotted at White House Again as Trump Huddles with GOP Lawmakers Preparing to Fight Back Against Dem Voter Fraud
@realDonaldTrump
@SidneyPowell1
via
@gatewaypundit
https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1341199110741831680?s=20
I would never bet against my country.
I'm Team America till the wheels fall off.
And I'm not a scumbag.
But you do you.
But it is true and it was a cia site.
Here's why you're wrong.
What you do is, take that statement and track it backwards to find the originator of the claim. Its a court thing.
What you're saying is these people just made up something out of nothing and said it.
That makes NO sense at all and is highly illogical. So I got these peoples' statements while you've got absolutely nothing at all, but act as if its the opposite.
Dude, this is simple stuff here.
Bottom line is this nutjob is so confused it wants to have it both ways.
“if Powell wins her case in court, I will give $1000 to FR”
OK so if he’s wrong he will donate $1K to FR.
“I am asking some of you Bigfoot chasers to pledge to give $1000 to FR if I am wrong.”
... and everyone else also owes a $1K donation because he’s wrong.
OK I’ve seen enough. This person is a certifiable idiot and proved it themselves.
More important things to do... later
SS1
To read
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.