Posted on 12/19/2020 8:35:57 AM PST by SkyPilot
Supreme Court Justice John Robers is a controversial judge, appointed by George Bush and at the time considered a conservative scholar, who has spent more than a decade delivering a deep betrayal to the American people as one of the more radical left justices on the Supreme Court, and one high profile person who is close to the President is boldly and publically calling Roberts to task with evidence that will damage Roberts.
“Answers to 2 simple questions below will tell We The People ALL we need to know about Chief Justice John Roberts. We, The People, are entitled to answers. You work for us, Justice Roberts. Answer these questions. They will not go away. You cannot fly TRUTH away on Epstein jet,” Wood said.
Woods also claims to have proof of a damaging phone call between Roberts and another justice that proves Roberts should step down.
“The People have list of questions for C.J. Roberts based on bizarre votes on major cases starting with Obamacare. But let’s ask him just two: 1. Are you the John Roberts on Epstein flight logs? 2. Did you say about @realDonaldTrump “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Wood said.
“Excellent thread to read & consider. A judge must be impartial. Chief Justice has proven by his documented profane comments about @realDonaldTrump that he is biased. At a minimum, barring further embarrassing disclosures, Roberts should recuse himself Trump election cases,” he said.
Attorney Lin Wood has taken up an approach of fiery blows in defense of President Donald J. Trump, against the Supreme Court’s actions, especially of Justice John Roberts, that is unfolding hourly.
Yes we are, Mr. President @realDonaldTrump. Yes we are. https://t.co/m1IXoAkRj1 — Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 18, 2020
Roberts does even more than deliver painful SCOTUS...
(Excerpt) Read more at davidharrisjr.com ...
just blather
Step back and use some rational reasoning
If one of them is not John Roberts - Chief Justice..it is reasonable to conclude the others may not be as well
This is furthered by the fact that John Roberts is Vice President of the company that owns the plane.
Thanks to a poster here who took the time to track that down..which I was too lazy to do.
Tail numbers tell a story. Like the interesting plane that was used in renditions that crashed with Sinaloa cocaine.
So all you have to do is look up the tail number on those logs
I can say with near 100% certainty that photo has not been Photoshopped. The heads belongs to the bodies and the bodies are on the couch together. The only thing that prevents a match is the blurriness of the chin, so it could be somebody who only bears a striking resemblance.
If you want a real eye opener about L Lin Wood read the lawsuit against him that includes messages sent from him.
He clearly is/was going through something. They sound unhinged to me.
Wood didn’t get anything from Georgia, so he went after the SOS and governor. Now he’s done nothing at the Supreme Court, so he’s going after Roberts.
Typical blame game, but the common factor in all these failed efforts is Lin Wood.
Here’s something - how much do you think Nick Sandmann got from CNN on the Covington case? Everyone ballyhoos that it was a 10 million dollar case, but it was settled for an “undisclosed amount.” Honestly, my guess is $10-50K.
“Woods [sic] also claims to have proof of a damaging phone call between Roberts and another justice that proves Roberts should step down.”
So, no proof. A claim.
Why would Roberts step down over an unsubstantiated claim? Better claims were made about Roberts during the Obamacare debacle. They led to nothing.
I cant guess. One of the anchors thought it was nuisance value.
I suspect more than nuisance value.
He deserves credit for taking on that case for whatever reason and helping that young man
But right now he seems a little out of control
It isn’t Roberts, that was figured out about 2 years ago.
And what if it was?
btw, people think he is a Dem plant.
I did not think so.
I really dont think so now after reading that lawsuit against him.
This is something else
Chasing Roberts will accomplish what for Trump’s election?
You will have to ask L Lin Wood
Oh thanks.
I didn’t disparage you in any manner.
I tried to write a post to emphasize the identity of the man in the photo because many don’t read articles or all the comments.
Don’t blame me for your thin skin worrying someone on FR might be a meanie. I wasn’t. I’m a woman and you can’t believe the nasty comments I’ve had from nasty men on here over the years who assume I’m a man and they are very crass, not the way I’d think a gentleman would ever talk to a woman. You learn about people.
But I said nothing to make you have that reaction to me. You should have been prepared for an answer to your question. I personally believe it’s pretty outrageous to see this type of wrong identity floating around the internet. That should actually upset you more than my correcting it.
I blame you for your bad manners and over-use of exclamation points.
Maybe Lin is baiting him to file a lawsuit so it can go into discovery. There must be something he knows but wish he would come out with it
Is that anything like an “innie” and an “outie?
Sorry. I'll try to keep up.
I can’t see squat of the ears in the Maxwell photo. BLURRED!
IF the photo is real?, it absolutely “could be” Roberts.
Why is Roberts? blurry while Ghislaine is quite clear?
Not convinced that it is a “real” unmanipulated photo.
But, it DOES look like Roberts.
Because if you use the same rigged system you will get the same rigged vote.
Or did you deliberately leave that part off?
https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/404/51923/Lin-Wood-complaint.pdf
From the lawsuit - this was Feb-Mar 2020:
[Woods'] belief was based, in part, on (1) a decade-plus old “prophecy” Defendant Wood heard in a YouTube video, and (2) a conspiracy theory that Chief Justice Roberts would be revealed to be part of Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring and was being blackmailed by liberals to rule in their favor.
It's hard to take Woods seriously after reading that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.