[Stormy_MS1]

I think this could have serious ethical implications for Lin Wood as an attorney. There is a fine line between first amendment speech and an officer of the court criticizing the judiciary.

[mlitefan]

I think this could have serious ethical implications for Lin Wood as an attorney. There is a fine line between first amendment speech and an officer of the court criticizing the judiciary.

---

I would think he is fully aware of making such an allegation without having absolute proof. This being leaked isn’t a coincidence....there are NO coincidences.

[bagster]

I think this could have serious ethical implications for Lin Wood as an attorney.

Yea, you'd think he'd know that too, being a lawyer and all.

And yet he said it.

Hmmmmmm.

[kiryandil]

There is a fine line between first amendment speech and an officer of the court criticizing the judiciary.

There's also a fine line about when someone turns loose a battalion of artillery on your @ss, and I think Lin Wood just did...

[Jan_Sobieski]

FOIA gives us all Non-classified government conversations

[poconopundit]

There is a fine line between first amendment speech and an officer of the court criticizing the judiciary.

* * *

Normally, that would be true. But our very Nation’s survival as a free republic is at stake. An insurrection is happening before our eyes.

That calls for strong words.

It may be that Lin Wood is forcing the hand of SCOTUS and they are likely to take Sidney Powell’s case, but shun Wood’s plea. Just speculation on my part. But psychology is a factor in all of this.

[Osagegirl]

Let Traitor Roberts sue. He wouldn’t like Discovery