I like you too.
#NoHomo
Posted on 12/17/2020 11:33:09 AM PST by MNDude
In discussing @realDonaldTrump in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberwts stated that he would make sure "the (profane word used for TRUMP) would never be re-elected" Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.
And:
This may be most important tweet of my life. Chief Justice John Roberts is corupt & should resign immediately. Justice Stephen Breyer should also resign immediately. They are "anti-Trumpers" dedicated to preventing public from knowing TRUTH of @realDonaldTrump re-election.
AND
I have long had questions about "the John Roberts" on Jeffrey Epstein private jet flight logs. I suspected it was our Chief Justice. MSM has shown no interest in investigating issue to find TRUTH. America is now entitled to know the answer. Every lie will be revealed. Pray.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
OK, ‘Thanks’ for that,
I must have been mistaken,
Barr’s DoJ/FBI could not find enough election fraud that EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD KNOWS OCCURRED, and HE SAID SO.
If he was/is not DeepState corrupt, there would have been investigations/arrests on Nov 5th.
Read this comment:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3916470/posts?page=278#278
See, I never pay attention to regular “news”. I find out what people really say and do.
I like you.
Thx
I have tried without success to go to your reference. Regardless. please explain how Barr’s DoJ/FBI could not uncover the BLATANT IN YOUR FACE FEDERAL ELECTION CRIME that EVERYONE knows occurred.
And then HE pedaled it (yes it was in the LYING all the time media) but HE said it.
They don't care about reciting some silly words called an "oath." They're communists/communist sympathizers. All they do is lie.
Words was screaming about videos of their cheating AND 1 week later videos were brought forward Lin doesn’t scream stuff without proof!! He could be sued for libel AND if anyone knows about libel it is Lin!!! HE HAS THE PROOF bank on it!!!
The referenced press conference transcript is available here:
If you can’t open the link, here is the relevant Q&A:
Q Thank you so much. Good to see you. Thank you. Appreciate it.
I want to ask you about comments that the Attorney General made to the Associated Press. He said, quote, “To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could’ve affected a different outcome in the election.” Given that, why hasn’t President Trump conceded?
MS. MCENANY: So, first, he went on to say this. It was in an AP interview where he made that initial comment, but in that same AP interview, he went on to say that he thinks a lot of people are confusing the use of the federal criminal justice system with allegations that should be made in civil lawsuits. And he discerned the fact that — he said, quote, “There’s a growing tendency to use the criminal justice system as sort of a default fix-all.” And the campaign’s litigation is all civil ligation, which is apart from something that the DOJ would be involved in.
I like you too.
#NoHomo
I don’t have the time to educate you. I read the the DoJ website to find out what the DoJ is actually doing. I find out what he actually said in full in transcripts, interviews and so on. That’s the only way to know, as the media cherry picks, takes out of context, twists, and leaves out the vital parts.
Thanks. And Barr also said when initially asked not long after the election (maybe a week) that investigators from the DoJ were looking into the election fraud and more were giong to be assigned. And Barr uses very careful language, as an attorney - “to date”. He personally had not seen. Ask him again today and his answer would be very different.
“...I want to ask you about comments that the Attorney General made to the Associated Press. He said. quote.. “To date. we have not seen fraud on scale that could’ve affected a different outcome in the election.”
So basically Barr did not care enough about his duty to protect the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic to investigate and present evidence of criminal election fraud (which was available on Nov 4th). I guess the train to Arizona and back was too long for the honest FBI,
right?
Also, if not DeepState how in the Hell was it his position to declare that it wouldn’t have made a difference ?!
You have to understand that a properly functioning Department of Justice does not disclose information about ongoing investigations. Nor do they telegraph their intentions via controlled media.
Might they utilize misdirection and lawyer speak to appear disinterested and distanced from possible criminal acts? I believe that they would.
Too many have grown to believe that the constant leaks from anonymous sources relayed by a compliant media in the administrations of the past are normal operation.
That’s not how it works when adults are in charge. YMMV
Yep,
“to date”
“It takes a damn long time for the FBI to train out to Arizona, Nevada and out West and such, and back, ‘specially with all them Pinkertons in the way”.
Right, and they would need to have secret phone calls to do that...
Come on. You know that makes no sense.
I have said from early on that POTUS should name one of his nominees for Chief Justice. I do not believe that appointment to that chair is necessarily for a lifetime. Snydley Roberts can still act out his treasonous fantasies - for a while - but he won’t be leading the court on a path to H3ll.
I have a suspicion a lot is going to change very soon. Lots and lots. Like the entire table being kicked over.
Like when I'm losing at Risk?
Like that?
No. Like THEM losing at Risk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.