Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

joecheated.com

hereistheevidence.com

1 posted on 12/11/2020 10:36:02 AM PST by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Heartlander

The Right is suing for Free and Fair Elections.

The Left is suing for a specific outcome.


2 posted on 12/11/2020 10:37:35 AM PST by MattMusson (Sometimes the wind blows too much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander

You can’t “disenfranchise” someone who never voted.


3 posted on 12/11/2020 10:39:41 AM PST by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander

Thanks for the links.


4 posted on 12/11/2020 10:44:51 AM PST by mkleesma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ml/nj

self ping


6 posted on 12/11/2020 10:50:15 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander

7 posted on 12/11/2020 10:53:44 AM PST by Rebelbase (A COVID misanthrope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander

1. Fraud is not alleged in the TX lawsuit - it is SOLELY based upon the fact that the defendant states altered their election procedures without their state legislatures being involved - which is required as part of the US Constitution.

2. WRT “disenfranchising millions of voters,” - well, that’s EXACTLY why Texas is suing, because the 4 defendant states are the ones which, by their improper changes to their election laws, have ACTUALLY disenfranchised millions of voters - specifically, those of TX and every other state which voted for Donald Trump. Further, THEY have, if any entity or person has, disenfranchised their own voters. You cannot murder your parents and then legitimately throw yourself upon the mercy of the Court because you’re an orphan, and that is essentially what the responses of the 4 defendant states have indicated.

2a) The voters of those states will NOT - repeat NOT - disenfranchise anyone. TX is asking for the SCOTUS to forbid the certification of these states, and to thus mandate (because that’s what the Constitution says must be done) that the legislatures of those states decide who those states’ Electors will be. Thus, through their legislators, the people of those states who legitimately voted will NOT be disenfranchised, but instead have their own elected representatives choose the Electors, and thus they will have had a voice. Now, what the legislatures choose to consider - perhaps and probably including efforts to fraudulently change the results of the Presidential election in their states - when deciding who to choose as Electors is their business and concern.


8 posted on 12/11/2020 11:09:05 AM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, “The Weapon Shops of Isher”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander

What we are disenfranchising are those who engaged or applauded the effort to rig the election, including a lot of private actors who have no legal authority over the conduct of elections and a lot of state actors who are not elected by the people but thought they could set aside the electoral schemes passed by the state legislatures.


10 posted on 12/11/2020 11:26:45 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander

People know there was election fraud but they don’t have the courage to see it contested because they know it will mean civil war. Seven months of riots going into the election were a low intensity civil war that was much more about Leftist outrage at Trump being president than it was about George Floyd being killed in a confrontation with police.


12 posted on 12/11/2020 12:34:45 PM PST by Sixgun Symphony (uie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson