Posted on 12/11/2020 3:13:27 AM PST by RandFan
@TheTomGeorge
NEW: Hawaii Rep. @TulsiGabbard introduces bill called ‘Protect Women’s Sports Act’ — would clarify Title IX protections to be based on biological sex, which would impact transgender athletes participating in athletic programs for women and girls.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
She’s hot too.
I don’t agree with her politics, but she’s on point with this bill.
Sports should not be segregated by gender. May the best person win.
You should look at her past position on the gay agenda. In order to qualify to be accepted into today’s rat party you have to raise your right hand and take the abortion pledge and support for the gay agenda pledge - at the very least. Then there are other pledges.
True, but she’s right on this issue.
Ping!
If she doesn’t support our republic as it was founded, and she doesn’t, I don’t give a tinker’s dam what she thinks about anything else.
“Just just make an act to say transgender get their sports program, their own bathrooms, and their own...”
Some counties and cities in America are just or not wealthy enough to build all these extra things for this one very small percentage of people who fall under this new category.
IOW schools are underfunded as it is, most are operating on shoestring budgets, and most infrastructure in middle and high schools is starting to crumble with age. Maybe they can defer to new builds.
You forgot the /s tag...I hope
Make a Transgender games. Like reindeer games. Anyone who was interested in going to them could pay the ticket and watch. If it is normal, let’s treat it that way.
They get their own everything and let’s see how that turns out.
Good call. She will probably end up in the media. I hope so anyway because for a Dem she is interesting (has a brain) there aren’t many I can say that about.
Maybe Sen. Ron Wyden who is good on privacy issues but he can be a bit of an ass however he cares about some issues and I respect that.
Gabbard is a wolf in sheep’s clothing....
Got that right Abortion, universal income, medicare for all. Huge Bernie fan. And yet we hear “she should switch sides”. Do we really need another rino?
And then the comments “rules” “she is cute” “hot”. I am sure the same comments Eric said about Fang Fang.
She’s a liberal, but not a nut. She stood out in that way during the Democrat debates.
No she is by far the least liberal. When one of the tech giants was blocking a complaint she had with the Democrats for shutting her out of the debates, she mentioned that conservatives were being censored. I think it may have been Google preventing it from coming up on searches. Creepy Joe would never say that.
Hey Gabbard; the best way to protect women from pre-birth to death is to remove DemonicRats from any office of power.
Biden should have picked her for VP.
She is one of the more likeable democrats, which is why Hillary said she was a russian agent, and why the liberals want to kick her out of the party.
We simply need to find a specific term and definition that distinguishes between the physical characteristics, which give rise to running separate sports programs.
If “woman” and “man” are now nebulous identities, then we just need leagues for “born with a penis” and “born with a vagina”. We can deal with the few cases of intersex people on a case-by-case basis.
The contradiction.
We are told that a “trangender woman” is a woman, exactly like a cis woman. There are no differences, we are not allowed to treat them any differently. The Supreme Court has ruled that “sex” is defined by this identity, and that “transgender women” are exactly like “cis women”. If you argue that a transgender woman should not be in a women’s shelter, you are attacked. If you argue that born-women have a right to argue about being scared of born-men who say they are women, you will be canceled. So clearly, in the realm of progressives, a transgender woman is indistinguishable from a cis woman.
OK.
They had a part in a movie for a character who was born male, and comes out as a female.
A female was cast to play the part.
The progressives were outraged, and ran a public campaign to shame the female into quitting, so that a “trans woman” could play the role.
Except there is absolutely no difference between a trans woman and a cis woman, so how could they possible claim that a part had to be played by a trans woman, as if a “trans woman” and a “cis woman” were different things?
According to probably unreliable studies, around 0.6% of the population is trans.
The fastest woman in the world can be beat by the top 300 high school male athletes.
And according to the study, 0.6% of boys will identify as trans women. 0.6% of 300 is 1.8, meaning that at any time, around 2 of the high schoolers who can beat the best female runner in the world will identify as women, and be allowed to compete.
So yes, no cis woman will ever win gold again.
Maybe they should create a league for cis women so they have a chance to compete with others like them. We could call it the inferior league, so that men who identify as trans-women won’t want to join up in the that league out of embarrassment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.