Posted on 12/10/2020 5:55:08 PM PST by ransomnote
I think I misunderstood who you truly are. I’d rather give you a pass obviously you are as upset as the majority of us are. So do me a favor and fu$k off.
__________________________________________________________
That's the spirit navymom1. Put up some fight. Now, just turn it toward the real enemy.
That sure brought navymom1 out of her funk g_w.
EO 13959 signed today may be the Trump card. https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/13959.pdf
*****************************************************************************
Minor detail. The EO is dated Nov. 12 - not today.
Hey Bagster, Wasn’t there some Christmas song we sang a while ago? That was fun.
Just says 45 day deadline, but doesn’t have to take that long!
@KurtSchlichter
· 2h
If you expect to win every single time and never to suffer an injustice, I’m not sure I can help you since I don’t have a time machine to send you back to be a teenager again and grow up a second time.
Pull yourself together. Get focused. We will win, unless you choose to pout.
Well, by now the cat is out of the bag: everyone is in various stages of shock and dealing with it in their own way.
The Supreme Court summarily and airily dismissed the lawsuit by Texas against the newly-declared Jesus states (they raised voters from the dead, and fed the 5000 miraculous ballots into voting machines).
On...get this..."Lack of Standing".
But there's more to the story here.
I have to type quick because I'm already being out-thought, outfoxed, and scooped by any number of other Patriots.
First -- let's look at something that most people still haven't grasped, something which accounted for a LOT of the shocked reaction.
And yet which started me off re-thinking all of this.
Nobody in the General Public had even HEARD of the Texas case five days ago.
What?
That's right, we were all hung up on Rudy Giuliani and Lin Wood and Sidney Powell, and being crestfallen at the constant drumbeat of "laches" (meaning, you should've sued BEFORE the election) and "lack of standing" and "we can't interfere with THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE™"(*), in addition to channeling Bart Simpson's "You didn't do it nobody saw you do it they can't prove anything" defense so thoughtfully provided by some of the judges.
So there has been a lot of disappointment and pressure building up, and people said, "Well, Bush v. Gore, of course it'll end up in the Supreme Court."
And President Trump and Q seemed to contribute to this, when President Trump just last weekend or so said "You're going to see a lot happening over the next few days, America deserves a victory" and Q returned after a long dry spell posting a video of "We're Not Gonna Take It", right before Texas filed its suit.
The suspense grew as a number of other states joined the suit, and a race of sorts developed to see which other states would file amicus briefs in support; and drama as some states held aloof, and others had their Governor or Secretary of State say one thing, and their Legislature, another.
President Trump even joined in, filing for permission to intervene as a Presidential candidate.
And seemingly, all for naught. The Supreme Court voted apparently 7-2 not even to *hear* the case...based on "lack of standing" due to Article III of the Constitution.
AND all the myriad of associated cases, including the President's asking to intervene, were rejected as moot, since they case they were riding in on had been dismissed. ("...and the parchment you rode in on.")
And a lot of hopes were dashed.
But several things stand out to me.
Like I said, five days ago nobody had HEARD of this.
And even the Glorious ACB, and ALL the President's nominations, voted against this. Et Tu, Brett-US?
Well, while hurriedly surfing over to the Supreme Court website ("No! It CAN'T be !") I noticed this little gem.
1) The Supreme Court building is closed indefinitely until further notice due to the Coof. Funny, I didn't remember reading that when I was on their website yesterday. Cases didn't get THAT much worse over night. Was this a cowards' way out, or making sure that the claims of "selected, not elected" don't have the ghost of a prayer? Or maybe a way of avoiding a bunch of heavily armed Pantifa ("Always in a Bunch") in DC, right before the pro-Trump rallies tomorrow?
2) The Supreme Court, by declining the case, avoided something.
They HAVEN'T ruled on the facts. Which means there is no definitive, nationwide ruling from a universally respected (well, ok, maybe not so much anymore all of a sudden) source, that the evidence for cheating was mere exaggeration, lies, lunacy, or hogwash.
3) Some other cases, which deal much more with the FACT of cheating, rather than with esoteric Constitutional penumbras and equal protections and stuff, are still pending before the court.
(With the building closed due to the Coof, I don't know when/if they'll be heard.)
But there are other points, some dealing with President Trump, some with Q, and some with other people and players.
First, President Trump has had a couple of curious Tweets over the past couple of days. He had a couple which said "COURAGE" or "STRENGTH & COURAGE". Now that's kind of an odd thing to post, if you think you're going to cruise to a 9-0 Supreme Court sweep, at the least, ordering a do-over in 4 or 5 questionable states, or all the way up to sending the election to the House of Representatives. I mean, what's there to be strong or courageous *about*. Now, they would make more sense, if they were directed not a Patriots, but at wavering Supreme Court Justices -- almost as if he had a sense, or information, that things weren't looking too good on that front. (As President, he just might have access to "sources and methods" unavailable to us.
And that sense was heightened, when he did a post just this morning, about "Now that the Biden Administration will be a scandal plagued mess for years to come, it is much easier for the Supreme Court of the United States to follow the Constitution and do what everybody knows has to be done. They must show great Courage & Wisdom. Save the USA!!!" and "Now it turns out that the Democrats want the Pack the Court with 26 Justices. This would be terrible, and must be stopped. Even Justice RBG was strongly opposed!"
What on EARTH was he Tweeting about "Now that the Biden Administration will be a scandal..."? That's almost as bad as his Tweet right after the election about Biden winning a rigged election (one of the rare missteps I've ever seen him make as President), for which he had to cover, "I Concede NOTHING!"
Both those Tweets are aimed at the Supreme Court, and again indicative he wasn't really counting on an easy victory there.
Then, AFTER the announcement was made, the President Tweeted out this:
pic.twitter.com/dx3C7jNE4O— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 11, 2020
This obviously is aimed at the public -- ostensibly asking them to "call their legislatures" : but actually spreading reinforcement and awareness of the multiple methods of fraud, all over the country.
However, there's one other little aspect of this which happened to strike me:
If it was a reaction to the Supreme Court, that means it had to be written, run past the lawyers, rehearsed, recorded, spliced together with fitting and perfectly matched film clips, and sent out, all in about 45 minutes.
I kinda doubt that.
Which means the Supreme Court reaction -- though shocking to us -- was planned and allowed for.
The next Tweet is about the Coof, and ties into other items.
President Trump Tweeted a speech that a vaccine (95% effective) is available from Pfizer / Modena:
pic.twitter.com/ofLq3OMicv— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020
This is important on several fronts.
1) Depending on how it is rolled out, it may provide the means to pry the economy away from tyrannical blue-state Governors.
2) This is now Trump's vaccine, not Biden's. And isn't it curious how Trump today ordered the head of the FDA to approve the vaccine NOW, or resign? Almost like Trump really, really wants the vaccine out, now; or maybe it's who might be distributing the vaccine (see below).
3) Trump doesn't look like a bully/tyrant throwing a temper tantrum (SJW's always *project*, they always accuse their opponents of what THEY are doing.). Over the Summer, it was BLM rioting; we didn't have middle-aged white women surrounding buildings and ...furiously knitting at them.
More on that contrast later.
4) This is where it gets a little more speculative / Q-like / tin-foil / unknown.
There is a web user on YouTube (if he hasn't been ...censored, more on that later too), monkeywerx, who is apparently ex-military or ex-pilot, who uses commercially available software to track plane flights in real time all over the US. Another FReeper, and I apologize for forgetting their name, has said that they use the proper terminology and they're not a clickbait site or LARPER (they look to be maybe 60 with a big grey beard. Not me, I promise.)
Monkeywerx has pointed out two things of interest.
First, there has been a large increase of flights, out of Europe and to the US, stopping in Iceland, and the Azores, and at Gitmo. He even tracks the planes by type and tail number: the flights to Gitmo actually blank out or change tail number during midflight (the plane's still right there on the radar), so it looks like these might be taking bad guys for "extraordinary rendition" or maybe dropping them off at Gitmo.
Second, there has been an EXTRAORDINARY increase in military flights, all over the country. Several nights ago, he showed a line of (I think it was) C-130 transports (each can carry say 300 troops, or 40,000 lbs of materiele), ALL flying into Neliss near Las Vegas. And there were reports of a lot of "ground based" activity near Yuma.
Could this be getting ready for "The Storm?" Or could it be getting together all the troops who will be rolling out the vaccine nationwide, shortly...and just incidentally, thereby putting US troops all over the country in case they are needed for something else, like the Insurrection Act.
Now, here's where this might tie into Q.
There are several aspects.
First, maybe not everyone on these threads has seen it, but President Trump made the following Tweet, not after the election, but way back in JUNE.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1275024974579982336
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
RIGGED 2020 ELECTION: MILLIONS OF MAIL-IN BALLOTS WILL BE PRINTED BY FOREIGN COUNTRIES, AND OTHERS. IT WILL BE THE SCANDAL OF OUR TIMES!
6:16 AM · Jun 22, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
94.1K Retweets 32.6K Quote Tweets 291.3K Likes
Q echoed and amplified this *the same day* on Q Drop 4494:
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: acb60b No.9707079 📁
Jun 22 2020 11:24:59 (EST)
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1275024974579982336📁
Is this about the virus OR THE ELECTION?
Manipulated polls meant to 'legitimize' rigged election results?
"The election was not rigged - all the polls demonstrated Biden's clear lead across the Country." - Example What happens if China successfully duplicates [clones] select ballots [battleground states]?
What happens if coordination exists with select states to deliver 'printing' and 'paper' ballot recipe(s)?
[secrets] to select [F] adversaries?
Nothing to lose?
Logical thinking.
Q
And there are other Q posts, from 2018 and 2019, which echo the same theme.
Drop 2479:
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.453 📁
Nov 11 2018 13:36:43 (EST) Drq26owWsAE-7Wy.jpg-large.jpg⬇
WHAT IF THE BELOW COULD BE PROVEN?
1-Election + D party officials filled out many thousands of blank ballots?
2-Election + D party officials removed and destroyed 'legal' ballots?
3-Election + D party officials deliberately organized non-citizen voting?
4-Election + D party officials in [XX] locations across the US [under lock & key] stored many thousands of 'blank' ballots for purposes of 'altering the vote total'?
Who safeguards 'blank' ballots?
Who issues 'blank' ballots?
Who controls 'blank' ballots?
How many 'blank' ballots are generated vs. total county pop?
THE CONTROL AND ISSUANCE OF BLANK BALLOTS IS KEY.
Why did the same counties [under dispute today] REFUSE to turn over voter registration information upon request to the Voter Fraud Commission?
Why was the Voter Fraud Commission disbanded and turned over to DHS?
What vested auth does DHS have compared to a commission body?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/without-evidence-trump-and-sessions-warn-of-voter-fraud-in-tuesdays-elections/2018/11/05/e9564788-e115-11e8-8f5f-a55347f48762_story.html?utm_term=.db84f6960764📁
Enemy @ the Front Door.
Q
Drop 2689:
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 82893e No.5123210 📁
Feb 11 2019 12:50:22 (EST)
VoterFraud.jpg⬇
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/acting-attorney-general-and-secretary-homeland-security-submit-joint-report-impact-foreign📁
[Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference]
Keyword: 'Foreign'
What about Domestic interference?
>Non-Cit votes by county
>Non-Cit promo by county
>Non-Cit org by county
>Targeted districts breakdown by 'Non-Cit' data acc
>Voter irregularities [internal]
>(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) > ballot pop > track for sign > submit late for count) - vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no show vote SC 2019 scope case?)
Why do D's push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections?
Why do D's push for OPEN BORDERS?
Find the connection.
Sometimes a MAP helps.
What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-court/supreme-court-upholds-photo-id-voting-law-idUSWAT00940020080428📁
What (FALSE) 'narrative' is pushed by D's re: VOTER ID LAW?
Racist?
Voter suppression of minority vote?
When is an ID required?
Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D's?
Does the argument 'A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote' suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID?
When is an ID required?
Which minorities are they referring to?
(illegal immigrants?)
Logical thinking.
If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+ common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit?
Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article92593512.html📁
Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past?
If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent 'minorities' from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite?
Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article215247000.html📁
Why do D's want POWER at all costs?
One example above.
Logical thinking.
#FactsMatter
You are the news now.
Q
And, remember, what Trump did in the winding down of the whole sordid Mewler snipe hunt, he issued an Executive Order about foreign interference in US elections.
So, with all the evidence being shown to the people, and the lower courts, and Governors unwilling to do anything about it, maybe that leaves, either the people, or the military.
Remember what Q said, "You, united, are their greatest fear."
And way back in 2017, Q said that maybe 70% of elected officials would be in jail if it all came out.
So maybe, that's why Q said, "The military is the only way."
And that's why the military is flying all over; and will be all over the place to "help administer vaccines."
And that's why we shouldn't be so worried about this court case.
...but apparently, the other side IS worried.
Last night, before the Supreme Court tossed the Texas Case, the Fricking Bunch of Incompetents issued a subpoena for Texas Attorney General. Right after the Texas case. What a coincidence!
And did you notice, by the way, that Portand is starting another independent zone and have been stockpiling weapons and chasing the police away? Wow, and they'd been so QUIET since right before the election.
And Scott Adams announced, YouTube was taking down one of his videos, and he thought they'd be coming for the others. And RSBN (Right Side Broadcasting Network) got pulled off of one of the social media giants.
Gee, didn't Q mention that kind of thing?
Why yes he did, right here. This is just one of the more recent examples.
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: fb2de1 No.11085831 📁
Oct 15 2020 11:48:46 (EST)
EkYXV_wVcAAck2O.jpg⬇
{Ben Garrison cartoon removed per FR rules}
Anons were warned years ago of pending 'China [communist] style' tactic approaching re: censor and terminate any/all dissenting views.
They are not in control of their own platform(s).
EVERY ASSET DEPLOYED.
You didn't think it was just a conspiracy did you?
Q
And speaking of "just a conspiracy" did you see how Schumer was asking, I think it was the CIA, for information on "Q Anon" and got a non-responsive run-around letter back?
But, even after all this, there's one other idea that struck me, as a possibity, that nobody touched on yet.
Here's a Q drop from Sept. 2020, Drop 4722:
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 338ebd No.10668955 📁
Sep 16 2020 12:16:59 (EST)
Add it all up.
1. Virus
2. Riots [organized _ANTIFA]
3. Fires
The 'Why':
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUxilJznKyY📁
Make no mistake, they will not concede on Election Night.
Make no mistake, they will contest this legally in battleground states.
Make no mistake, they will project doubt in the election results
Make no mistake, they will organize massive riots and attempt Anarchy-99 design
Playbook known.
Q
These things all together, have the makings of a Color Revolution.
A Color Revolution is a method of overthrowing a Govt., and the factors needed to make it happen have been published and are well-known in Clowns in America circles.
One paraphrased description is given below, from Wikipedia.
U.S. Color revolution
In the early 2000s, Obama apparatchik Michael McFaul studied the so-called color revolutions in the former states of the Soviet Union. McFaul identified the seven elements of successful revolutions in these countries. Reporting from far left The Atlantic and The New York Times fits into step number seven. Both publications ran stories highlighting racial, gender, and sexual orientation divisions in the military in early September 2020.
1.) The first element of a successful color revolution, according to McFaul, is a semi-autocratic rather than fully-autocratic regime. This narrative about President Trump has been pervasive in the liberal media and echoed by prominent Democrats since before he was elected. Despite all evidence to the contrary, President Trump is consistently painted as walking the line between constitutional order and authoritarianism. Over the Summer of 2020, Democrats and the fake news media resurfaced the narrative that President Trump will not accept the 2020 presidential election results if Joe Biden wins. They assert that he will refuse to concede and will have to be forced out of the White House if he loses the election.
2.) According to McFaul, the second requirement is 'an unpopular incumbent'. The left uses identity politics to try and make President Trump unpopular with specific constituencies. "Peaceful Protests" are used to create an illusion there are hordes of citizens who oppose President Trump. The fake news mainstream media and Democrats try to frame the riots as “Trump’s America,” despite all the evidence the riots are supported by Democrats in power and even financially supported by members of the 2020 Biden campaign.
3.) A third requirement, according to McFaul, is a united and organized opposition. The opposition has a name. The NeverTrump Resistance started shortly after the 2016 presidential election. Using the hashtag or the phrase is a way to signal you are on the team. Any group can join the broader movement and oppose the president on their own terms. Poorly weighted polls were pushed out by corporate media outlets after the conventions that either oversample specific populations or survey all adults rather than likely voters or registered voters.
4.) McFaul says the fourth ingredient in a successful color revolution is an ability to quickly drive home the point that voting results were falsified. Democrats are setting up 2020 so that either side can make this claim. It has been reported that between 2012 and 2018, at least one in five mail-in ballots went missing in elections nationwide.Democrats are counting on this, and it is why they are pushing so hard for it. When a large number of mail-in votes are missing or thrown out for technical reasons, Democrats will scream disenfranchisement. Yet, Democrats are the ones who set up their own voters to be disenfranchised by pushing COVID-19 panic porn.
This chaos impacts the way elections typically proceeds as required by law. Local election results will be challenged in court nationwide, and it will make the Florida Recount controversy in Bush v. Gore look like child’s play. Results will be delayed for weeks and threaten the deadlines to confirm results at the state level.
According to one analysis in The Wall Street Journal, entire states could be disenfranchised. Democrats and their allies in the media are willing to destroy faith in a safe and fair election that leads to the peaceful transfer of power the United States has relied on for more than two centuries. These are the lengths they will go to in order to gain power. They pushed mail-in voting despite health experts saying in-person voting is safe.
(Sharryl Atkisson Tweet).
5.) Number five is having enough independent media to inform citizens about the falsified vote. As Ben Shapiro noted, the media is simply the PR wing for the Biden campaign. Sharyl Attkisson went a step further and outlined the current information operation regarding the military: Democrat operatives, including John Podesta, did an election war game. The results were published in The Washington Post, and it advanced the idea that the only way to avoid violence is a Biden landslide. It also laid out the Democrats’ response to a loss in 2020, which included having California, Oregon, and Washington secede from the United States. Then they would wait to see how the military responded.
The corporate media has been framing whatever narrative the Democrats need since 2016. They framed President Trump as an illegitimate leader based on the Russia collusion hoax. By the Fall of 2020 the fake news media resurfaced the same meme based on a leak from a classified briefing and simply ignored the fact that the briefing said China and Iran are working hard to get Biden elected and were acting in more overt ways than Russia.
6.) McFaul notes, a political opposition capable of mobilizing tens of thousands or more demonstrators to protest electoral fraud is necessary. The DNC partners with two organizations, Act Blue and Action Network, who are allied with one another. Together these platforms allow progressive groups, including antifa, to raise money and organize protests electronically. It gives progressive activist groups the ability to privately and quickly communicate with members of their mailing lists. There is even a degree of list-sharing between the groups. From Action Network’s announcement of the DNC partnership:
We had hoped to announce our partnership with the DNC under much different circumstances, but now, facing an unprecedented crisis that has forced us all to move our organizing from in-person to digital, our partnership to build robust, safe, and trusted technology for the movement is more important than ever. As COVID-19 affects our collective communities and changes the world around us by the hour, we are working to be as responsive as possible to the needs of you, our partners, and your communities. For months now, in partnership with the DNC and through our non-profit, cooperative development model, we’ve been doubling down on our efforts to make sure the Action Network toolset can be there every moment to get your communications in people’s inboxes quickly and effectively.
Democrat leaders have openly endorsed the riots and encouraged violence. The radicals in the street have openly supported violence and actively call for a revolution.
7.) The last requirement McFaul lists is divisions among the regimes’ coercive forces. This element is the most dangerous and sinister one on the list. It has also been going on for four years. The intelligence community and federal law enforcement apparatus were weaponized against President Trump before the 2016 election. Leaks from these agencies have been constant and divisive.
So you need:
a semi-autocratic regime
an unpopular incumbent
a united and organized opposition
a way to prove voting results were falsified
independent media to drive home the vote fraud
a political opposition to mobilize tens of thousands or more demonstrators
divisions among the regime's coercive forces.
Sound familiar? No wonder Q said "Playbook known."
Now here's the curveball.
Read over the list again.
What if it's Trump and Q, who are staging the color revolution, against China/Biden/The Deep State?
= = = = = = =
(*) that's a catch-all phrase corrupt Democrats like to use to justify, well, pretty much anything they want. Remember way back in 2002, when the New Jersey Supreme Court used this phrase to allow Toricelli to replace Lautenberg on the ballot for the Senate?
Hmmm. Going down the thread, I saw this tweet:
JustTheTweets - America First
@JustTheTweets17
·
Dec 10
One anonymous whistle blower was OK to impeach the President of the United States but, 1000’s of sworn affidavits of election fraud is not enough to investigate?
Very good observation by JustTheTweets17. :)
Bags, got to agree with you on that call. Still liked the pepe’s that liked them though. Several songs are good.
bitt wrote:
“With SCOTUS dismissing the Texas lawsuit, where does the President stand?
Exactly where he stood before Texas filed the case.
There are many paths to victory.
None require a ruling from the Supreme Court.
The longer the process goes, the more it favors POTUS.#GameTheory— Praying Medic (@prayingmedic) December 12, 2020”
ThankQ for the link!
https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1337549909747138560?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
I scrolled down and found this q post about the military:
https://twitter.com/Netophath/status/1337554453168271363
I wonder if we will hear eventually how 'our judges' wanted to hear the Texas + case but Chief Justice Roberts used some judicial slight of hand to turn the decision... don't know, of course, but a small voice keeps telling me that.
Well that’s strange, tweet was from CodeMonkeyZ, numbers were sequential. Thanks for the correction.https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1337591001217597440
Why did Trump file this particular suit in Wisconsin personally suing Popcorn three days ago? It's going to be heard tomorrow at the WISC
My extended thoughts:
Figures. I’ve heard that they all have ties to the Bushes, too. Why would Trump appoint them, knowing all that? Part of the plan? Who knows. If they’ve been bribed or have been deceptive in some way, military intelligence would likely have the evidence.
Mama25 wrote:
“bitt wrote: “Q’s last post We’re not gonna take it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1l-nR1Apj4 “
“What were the words flashed on the screen during that video?”
at 30 seconds, ‘The forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no longer’
at 50 seconds, ‘Now arrives the hour of action’
at 2 minutes 50 seconds, ‘When America is united America is totally unstoppable’
“
ThankQ, Mama25 !
Yep, GW, I re-read that differently now. What if...Who is “they”? lol
I refuse to bury my head in the sand.
NO, it appears to be somewhere else. (And I don’t necessarily think it’s in the clouds.)
********************************************************************************
When a soldier stumbles and falls, I think it is a good idea to help them up and help them soldier on, not kick them while they are down. YMMV
_____________________________________________________________
Well, it sure succeeded in putting the fight back in her in a hurry. I imagine you read her response and the same one she later gave to bagster.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here's the way I look at it:
We are here today in large part because SCOTUS were cowards and would not deal with the issue of “natural born citizen”. If they had they would have had to say that Soetoro was illegitimate and Pelosi perpetrated a fraud when she swore he was eligible.
So they did the “no standing” act and then said, well the people have spoken.
Same reason they will not address “shall not be infringed”. Cowards
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I agree. Every case about 0bola’s non-eligibility made it to a judge, the finding would be that no one ever had any standing, so no evidence was ever presented. There was one judge in I think San Diego, a retired Marine, and people had hopes. He actually gave that Moldovian attorney (blonde, was is her name?? She’s also a dentist IIRC) a listen and made another date to hear some evidence. Then Perkins Coie got to him and at the next sesions he said “no standing” and did not hear evidence. Turned out a clerk he just recently got (I think it was recently) previusly worked for....Perkins Coie. Who always represented 0bola in every case.
A thought just occurred to me about this SCOTUS ruling and applying gnerally.
For years, and I heard AG Barr give a speech about this quite some time ago, the judiciary has become MUCH too powerful. Instead of legislative action, people turn to courts, and judges have become bloated and power mad (my words, not Barr’s). The judiciary needs to resume their proper position in the balance of power between the three branches.
So maybe in the ultimate issue this ruling will actually help to pave the way for a less bloatedly powerful judiciary.
That is a fine benediction for those of us heading for bed soon. I remember reciting Psalm 20 to my children on the night the Towers fell. Thank you for the reminder. We hold the line, trusting in the One Who holds it all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.